Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Silver Spring, MD
2,130 posts, read 1,798,617 times
Reputation: 2315

Advertisements

So are you more upset that parents who can't afford to feed their children now have that worry off their shoulder, or that those that had to choose between feeding them and clothing and sheltering their kids don't have to make that choice, or that those that could comfortably feed their children now can spend that money for other things?

And isn't the outrage not that your child is being told what to eat but that you aren't the one telling them, because for most kids it's always some adult making the choice.

Also is there some rule that your child must eat those meals and that you aren't allowed to feed them breakfast before sending them to school or forbidden to send them with the lunch you want them to eat?

 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:03 AM
 
36,576 posts, read 30,900,697 times
Reputation: 32870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye77 View Post
I'm so old that I remember when it was part of the parent's responsibility to feed their kids. Worked for my folks, and it worked for me and my kids, and then my kids and their kids
Me too.
 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:05 AM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,763,287 times
Reputation: 19118
This passed in CO as well. I don’t have any issues with it.
 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:06 AM
 
6,389 posts, read 2,718,141 times
Reputation: 6133
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
I look at it as control. I agree with you in that it’s not a huge deal, especially in a state that runs billions budget surpluses every year. But our DFL (What Minnesota Democrats call themselves) will not stop with just funding it. They will want to control what your kid eats too.
It's not mandatory to get the "free lunch". It doesn't appear that they are taking away the ability for a parent to send them with a lunch and I am sure that a majority of the parents who do that today...will still continue to do that.

Lunch/Breakfast menus are already determined by the Government, and this hasn't changed in decades.
 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:07 AM
 
63,003 posts, read 29,187,836 times
Reputation: 18610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye77 View Post
I'm so old that I remember when it was part of the parent's responsibility to feed their kids. Worked for my folks, and it worked for me and my kids, and then my kids and their kids
Exactly! Why is it the school's and the taxpayer's responsibility to feed other people's kids? Schools aren't restaurants and it's their own parent's responsibility to feed their kids.
 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:09 AM
 
27,668 posts, read 16,156,388 times
Reputation: 19096
At the tax rate per student, i suppose it should be expected. Free dinner is on the menu in some areas, for anyone that shows up with a student too. I suppose free housing is in the works somewhere. Free money, free job?
 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:10 AM
 
63,003 posts, read 29,187,836 times
Reputation: 18610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Here in Washington state a bill is now being debated to start that for next school year too, a state House bill by two Democrats. The justification is that kids that are hungry cannot learn, and if they have to qualify for free meals there is a stigma.
Why are any of these kids hungry? If they are that poor their parents are getting food stamps!
 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:10 AM
 
25,850 posts, read 16,547,069 times
Reputation: 16028
Quote:
Originally Posted by shellymdnv View Post
So are you more upset that parents who can't afford to feed their children now have that worry off their shoulder, or that those that had to choose between feeding them and clothing and sheltering their kids don't have to make that choice, or that those that could comfortably feed their children now can spend that money for other things?

And isn't the outrage not that your child is being told what to eat but that you aren't the one telling them, because for most kids it's always some adult making the choice.

Also is there some rule that your child must eat those meals and that you aren't allowed to feed them breakfast before sending them to school or forbidden to send them with the lunch you want them to eat?
Not really upset, I’m just hoping the kids get a lesson in socialism and how truly destructive it is.
 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:11 AM
 
Location: West Virginia
5,044 posts, read 2,404,947 times
Reputation: 3590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Why are any of these kids hungry? If they are that poor their parents are getting food stamps!
The lunch counter at school doesn't accept food stamps.
 
Old 02-10-2023, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Northwest Houston
564 posts, read 298,556 times
Reputation: 684
I have no idea why anyone would have a problem with this. Especially since MN apparently has billions in surplus. It’s great they are investing that back into the children.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top