Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Cohen is such an honest person....right? His word is rock solid....something you can depend on to be absolutely correct...lol!
The DA seems to think so, and Cohen's deposition under oath and his live testimony during the trial will be a focal point of the prosecution. Cohen and Trump are the only two people alive who were involved in the payoff. As such, that makes Cohen a reliable eyewitness.
A jury will decide what is true and not true in the case, which witnesses to believe or not believe. Receipts shown will certainly get a jury's attention.
Not the issue. This is all about how the payments were accounted for.
Cohen has said he made the payment to keep Daniels from coming out with the story before the election. Cohen was repaid in several installments by Trump. The payments were not listed on the ledger as "Hush Money" but were paid from Trump Org funds.
The accounting is fraudulent, but also at issue is the context of keeping Daniels quiet to protect his reputation during a campaign, in other words a donation under the table to Trump's campaign.
Cohen will be testifying in the trial. You can also read his book. He detailed a lot of what he will say under oath.
One more time. If the FEC and IRS said there was NO crime, let alone a violation to impose a fine like they did Obama in 2008 why is a New York political corrupt DA is saying it is and making the U.S. into a Banana Republic?
You know how ridiculous and desperate they are getting close to an election?
One more time. If the FEC and IRS said there was NO crime, let alone a violation to impose a fine like they did Obama in 2008 why is a New York political corrupt DA is saying it is and making the U.S. into a Banana Republic?
Did Obama pay someone off not to expose something salacious about him?
Quote:
You know how ridiculous and desperate they are getting close to an election?
Trump has been delaying this and most other trials so he could convince people of the POV you shared before, ideally on his part, winning the election and having his cases dismissed or deferred yet again.
Officially making Trump's comments about Hilary just projection about himself.
“Hillary is likely to be under investigation for many years, probably concluding in a criminal trial.”
He's already been a convict; he's certainly not going jeopardize his freedom by lying under oath on the stand.
He can say what he wants but he is a convicted liar under oath so he doesn't have any weight. The FEC and IRS said there was NO crime even to fine him like they did Obama in 2008. The Democrat Inc Circus.
One more time. If the FEC and IRS said there was NO crime, let alone a violation to impose a fine like they did Obama in 2008 why is a New York political corrupt DA is saying it is and making the U.S. into a Banana Republic?
You know how ridiculous and desperate they are getting close to an election?
Then the jury will find Trump to be "not guilty," right"? So no problemo.
Citizen Trump is going to trial. He's not above the law. A grand jury found enough evidence for this to proceed to trial; now as a citizen, he faces the possibility of being found innocent or guilty. Hush money payments to a porn star. Is nothing off limits for the GOP to get upset about.
" A grand jury found"
I wonder how many are dems.
" He's not above the law"
But dems like hillary and teddy kennedy are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.