Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2008, 02:09 PM
 
413 posts, read 782,457 times
Reputation: 119

Advertisements

Why not remove all financial benefits associated with marriage?
Why should non-married couples subsidize the life of married ones?
Why should single professionals support rabbits or upper class childless married couples?

Last edited by Frenchman; 05-25-2008 at 02:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2008, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,273,993 times
Reputation: 11416
I'm a single professional, and agree with your premise to a point.
I have to do some more personal analysis to see what resonates with me, but at face value, it could work.

There would be a greater requirement for wills because assets wouldn't just pass from one spouse or generation to the next.

One point is that in a two adult person household, there are two incomes to pay for living expenses. In a one person household, the same expenses exist (rent, utilities, food, etc) but only one income pays for it.
I believe my tax rate should be the same as every other adult.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 06:49 PM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,266,089 times
Reputation: 1124
Frenchie, you've finally started a decent thread!

Yes, I'm all for the government getting out of the marriage business together. No straight marriages, no gay marriages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,063,439 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frenchman View Post
Why not remove all financial benefits associated with marriage?
Why should non-married couples subsidize the life of married ones?
Why should single professionals support rabbits or upper class childless married couples?
What subsidies do you claim exist for married people?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 07:30 PM
 
Location: DC Area, for now
3,517 posts, read 13,257,914 times
Reputation: 2192
For one, the income tax rate is higher for single taxpayers than it is for marrieds. With nearly half the taxpayers filing single, it amounts to a subsidy of married people and is not really fair.

In most states family law sets up a marriage as a business partnership with specific benefits and responsibilities, many of which are for the benefit of children if they exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 07:36 PM
 
Location: um....guess
10,503 posts, read 15,561,646 times
Reputation: 1836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesaje View Post
For one, the income tax rate is higher for single taxpayers than it is for marrieds. With nearly half the taxpayers filing single, it amounts to a subsidy of married people and is not really fair.

In most states family law sets up a marriage as a business partnership with specific benefits and responsibilities, many of which are for the benefit of children if they exist.
Right & here's something else I don't get, why should people who have kids get that tax credit? Isn't having a kids a choice? I'm single w/no kids & live alone & I have a hell of a time getting by what w/rent, bills, etc. Why are single people who choose not to have the financial burden of kids not rewarded? Oh I'm sure I'll get a huge ass-kicking for this post, but this is my honest opinion & question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,063,439 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesaje View Post
For one, the income tax rate is higher for single taxpayers than it is for marrieds. With nearly half the taxpayers filing single, it amounts to a subsidy of married people and is not really fair.

In most states family law sets up a marriage as a business partnership with specific benefits and responsibilities, many of which are for the benefit of children if they exist.
Actually there's a marriage penalty. The income tax rate is higher for a married couple who both work than for two singles.

Marriage is not require for children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 07:45 PM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,266,089 times
Reputation: 1124
Very simple solution to the current mess and confusion.

Get rid of the state's recognition of marriage, get rid of the IRS, have a national sales tax that is based on consumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,063,439 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by karfar View Post
Right & here's something else I don't get, why should people who have kids get that tax credit? Isn't having a kids a choice? I'm single w/no kids & live alone & I have a hell of a time getting by what w/rent, bills, etc. Why are single people who choose not to have the financial burden of kids not rewarded? Oh I'm sure I'll get a huge ass-kicking for this post, but this is my honest opinion & question.
You take the deduction for yourself don't you? Deduction for dependents is not related to marriage. Seem off topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2008, 07:48 PM
 
4,050 posts, read 6,138,402 times
Reputation: 1574
I'm really beginning to think it's a good idea myself, but I feel like it's one of those things that will never actually happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top