Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-05-2008, 08:58 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
1,590 posts, read 4,576,723 times
Reputation: 458

Advertisements

The U.S. unemployment rate unexpectedly shot up to 6.1 percent in August, the highest in nearly five years, as employers cut payrolls for an eighth straight month and a decline in labor markets accelerated.
84000 jobs were lost in August!!!!!

I WANT CHANGE NOW NOT IN 4 YEARS
VOTE FOR CHANGE!

OBAMA 08

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-05-2008, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Looking over your shoulder
31,304 posts, read 32,891,980 times
Reputation: 84477
Somebody should have told Bush about this long ago,,,, or were those lies he talked about over the past four years?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
How could it be unexpected..banks/brokerages/airlines/construction have been saying for months that there would be layoffs. Since June we've seen in the news that X company to lay off y thousands of workers.

What was unexpected to me was that they couldn't find any way to fluff it up this time.
And..btw they adjusted the other months' numbers as well..upward as they underestimated those numbers.

The numbers seem to be more realistic and in line with what is going on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 09:34 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
What was unexpected to me was that they couldn't find any way to fluff it up this time. And..btw they adjusted the other months' numbers as well..upward as they underestimated those numbers.
What was the nature of and rationale offered for these adjustments? Are any of them regularly scheduled revisions, or did they just finagle the data until they got what they wanted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The numbers seem to be more realistic and in line with what is going on.
What data or other standards do you use to determine whether the BLS numbers are "in line with what is going on"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 09:34 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by AksarbeN View Post
Somebody should have told Bush about this long ago,,,, or were those lies he talked about over the past four years?


No, it's lies he talked about for the last 7+ years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,012 posts, read 7,875,674 times
Reputation: 5698
We are reliving the guns and butter of the 1960's. We've had the guns and the butter will come with Osama. It's going to be much worse this time around though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 10:37 AM
 
Location: TX
743 posts, read 2,068,806 times
Reputation: 296
Best we can do is minimize our daily expenses. We can control how we live. I've just recently canceled my newspaper subscription (why need one when I have cable and internet), and we scrapped all plans to put our infant in daycare. I've also started selling away my stuffs on eBay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,014,195 times
Reputation: 36644
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The American economy can reduce the jobless rate to zero, just by putting everybody on the payroll, asking them to do something at home, and sending them a check on Friday. Many jobs, maybe most, do not contribute any more than that to our national productivity, but they do contribute to the "jopbless rate" and hence the "economy" just by being reported to an agency that counts jobs.

Similarly, consider this scenario. Every person has one part time job; Full employment, zero unemployment. Half the work force quits, and the remaining workers are either scheduled to work 50 hours a week, or assume a second part-time job. Now we have exactly the same number of man-hours of work being done, exactly the same aggregate productivity, but the jobless rate is 50%.

Are you starting to get the picture about the wardrobe of this particular king?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 11:45 AM
 
4,173 posts, read 6,689,002 times
Reputation: 1216
By most international standards, 6.1% is not too bad (not good either). My bigger problem is the vast amount of money being spent on a needless war (Iraq, not Afghanistan) that could have been used to do much better things within the US. You see a lot of bravado in these forums - calling for everyone's a$$ to be kicked -but there is no concept of how high the costs of war are now-a-days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
What was the nature of and rationale offered for these adjustments? Are any of them regularly scheduled revisions, or did they just finagle the data until they got what they wanted?


What data or other standards do you use to determine whether the BLS numbers are "in line with what is going on"?
Previous months numbers are always adjusted and reported. You just have to read them. The government does not give any rationale for the adjustments. I guess they estimate them and then readjust when the actual numbers are counted.

The BLS numbers don't lie but the adjustments have been changing so the resultant number is not always reality.

By "more in line with what's going on" is that now the numbers reflect big job loss numbers that reflect the MSM articles of big industry layoffs.
The numbers reflect what we read.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top