Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-17-2008, 02:09 PM
 
1,348 posts, read 3,587,417 times
Reputation: 944

Advertisements

Anyone else find it funny that old "Mr. Tax-and-Spend-Liberal-Democrat-Marxist-Communist" Bill Clinton left his 2 terms in office with over a $560 billion dollar federal surplus, approval ratings in the high 60s, while Dumbya Boosh will leave office with a trillion dollar federal deficit and a devastated economy?

For 8 whole years in the 1990s, Repubs always claimed Bill Clinton was a communist (just like they claim Obama is now), shouting in bug-eyed hysterics "SOCIALISM!" and "MARXIST"!!

So if "Marxist communism" means smaller government, balanced budgets, federal surpluses, competent governance, and respect in the world, then what does that say about the "conservative principles" of the GOP posterboy George W. Bush and his "conservative" Republican Congress he had that helped him rack up spending and deficits?

Isn't this more proof that conservative Republicans--when you really get down to it--have no idea what they're babbling about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-17-2008, 02:25 PM
 
Location: 38°14′45″N 122°37′53″W
4,156 posts, read 11,013,417 times
Reputation: 3439
Quote:
Originally Posted by xavierob82 View Post
Anyone else find it funny that old "Mr. Tax-and-Spend-Liberal-Democrat-Marxist-Communist" Bill Clinton left his 2 terms in office with over a $560 billion dollar federal surplus, approval ratings in the high 60s, while Dumbya Boosh will leave office with a trillion dollar federal deficit and a devastated economy?

For 8 whole years in the 1990s, Repubs always claimed Bill Clinton was a communist (just like they claim Obama is now), shouting in bug-eyed hysterics "SOCIALISM!" and "MARXIST"!!

So if "Marxist communism" means smaller government, balanced budgets, federal surpluses, competent governance, and respect in the world, then what does that say about the "conservative principles" of the GOP posterboy George W. Bush and his "conservative" Republican Congress he had that helped him rack up spending and deficits?

Isn't this more proof that conservative Republicans--when you really get down to it--have no idea what they're babbling about?
Yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2008, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
1,774 posts, read 2,809,761 times
Reputation: 213
That's what the American people were looking for....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2008, 02:48 PM
 
2,260 posts, read 3,882,428 times
Reputation: 475
Clintons surplus was an accounting scam that had nothing to do with his Presidency except he stayed ouyt of the way(Thank God for Newt). W has spent alot and more than I think was necessary. He had alot of dirty work to do so we kind of had to give him the checkbook.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2008, 10:57 AM
 
1,348 posts, read 3,587,417 times
Reputation: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryan61 View Post
Clintons surplus was an accounting scam that


So let me guess: Bush's $600 billion federal deficit is also an "accounting scam", too, right?

Face it: liberals have now become the fiscal conservatives.

Conservatives are now just bible-thumpers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2008, 11:43 AM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,832,259 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryan61 View Post
Clintons surplus was an accounting scam that had nothing to do with his Presidency except he stayed ouyt of the way(Thank God for Newt). W has spent alot and more than I think was necessary. He had alot of dirty work to do so we kind of had to give him the checkbook.
lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2008, 11:48 AM
 
Location: S.Florida
3,326 posts, read 5,342,700 times
Reputation: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by xavierob82 View Post
So let me guess: Bush's $600 billion federal deficit is also an "accounting scam", too, right?

Face it: liberals have now become the fiscal conservatives.

Conservatives are now just bible-thumpers.
------------------

Face it: liberals have now become the fiscal conservatives.


lol wait 6 months from now and lets see if that is the case with no concept of money Pelosi/Reid Congress.
Dont confuse speeches with action if you do look at Pelosis voting record in last 2 yrs you would think it was Dick Cheney ofcourse while singing a diff song.

The new President is going to have his hands full but dont see Reid and Pelosi as fiscal conservatives nor helping him much
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2008, 01:07 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luiso View Post
------------------

Face it: liberals have now become the fiscal conservatives.


lol wait 6 months from now and lets see if that is the case with no concept of money Pelosi/Reid Congress.
Dont confuse speeches with action if you do look at Pelosis voting record in last 2 yrs you would think it was Dick Cheney ofcourse while singing a diff song.

The new President is going to have his hands full but dont see Reid and Pelosi as fiscal conservatives nor helping him much

I don't see 6 months as near enough time to undo 8 years of misleadership and fiscal irresponsibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2008, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,237 posts, read 18,594,984 times
Reputation: 25807
Congres passes the spending bills BEFORE they go to the President. Last time I checked Congress has been Democrat for the last two years, and before that very evenly matched. Bush should have vetoed the spending though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 08:57 AM
 
5,165 posts, read 6,055,276 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by luiso View Post
------------------

face it: Liberals have now become the fiscal conservatives.


Lol wait 6 months from now and lets see if that is the case with no concept of money pelosi/reid congress.
Dont confuse speeches with action if you do look at pelosis voting record in last 2 yrs you would think it was dick cheney ofcourse while singing a diff song.

The new president is going to have his hands full but dont see reid and pelosi as fiscal conservatives nor helping him much

6 months later!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top