Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"I can show that your statement is plainly false without checking your links" but can you stay on topic and disprove the evedence provided by the links?
The topic is the ToE and the non-existence of any controversy about it. Bible proselytizing is another thread.
You believe in a book of fables. That's OK. But it ain't science.
Midocean ridges are not stable. The plates on either side move away from the ridge, and vulcanism is common. Old vents can be destroyed and new ones can be created on human time scales. There are sites where, despite erosion and overfill, three successive generations of smokers can be observed.
Well, it would if the junior members ended up with all the power and plum assignments, and then they were shoved more and more out of the picture the longer they served...
Well, it would if the junior members ended up with all the power and plum assignments, and then they were shoved more and more out of the picture the longer they served...
As it is, the old ones get to slough off and spurt smoke from their fissures.
Then prove it wrong. Show us all, as Idahogie has said, that the Bible is a book of fables.
That is not my place to do so. I respect Christianity and Christians. However, it has nothing to do with the debate on evolution.
And before it gets brought up again:
Evolution makes no attempt to explain the origins of life. That is a science known as abiogenesis. And, the Big Bang has nothing to do with evolution. The Big Bang is astrology. Evolution is biology.
If we are here to debate the validity of evolution, keep it to evolution. Don't bring other sciences into it.
I do believe you need to read up on human development. Fetuses develop gills inside the womb.
...Fetuses also have tails in early development and their hands/feet first develop as paddle-like appendages before the development of fingers/toes....these paddles look strikingly like fins.
Wrong. You need to learn some more about embryology. Humans in the embryonic stage do have gills (also known as gill arches or pharyngeal arches Pharyngeal arch - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) These structures are homologous to the gills in fish. Fish and humans share genes that control the development of these structures. And why do fish and humans share such genes? Because they both evolved from a common ancestor.
In the adult human, the gill arches develop into the muscles and other small structures of the face, neck, and throat.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
