Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-03-2009, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
5,224 posts, read 5,010,608 times
Reputation: 908

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
It's funny how uninformed you think I am... I actually talk to people who lived/live in Canada (as in their moving here now) and they tell quite a different story than you're trying to push. They described their experience with Canadian UHC on a couple of occasions, one hospital stay as recent as 8 months ago and it was not pleasant and not one that would happen here. I'd suggest actually talking to people who have to deal with it not just reading what people want you to see.
I've talked to people in Canada.. no horror stories there.

I've also talked to people in other EUROPEAN countries with other UHC systems..

Canada is not the be all end all of a UHC system.. and, btw. . their satisfaction rates are pretty high.. not to mention they wouldn't be clamoring for an American system anytime soon.

Oh and those coming to America to seek healthcare equal a whopping .5%.. that's 1/2 a percent total.. and most of those are snowbirds that live here half the year
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2009, 02:10 PM
 
48 posts, read 62,093 times
Reputation: 26
TM you seem to be totally blind to the other side of the issue. Here is an article that will broaden your horizon.

www.city-journal.org/html/17_3_canadian_healthcare.html[/quote]]The Ugly Truth About Canadian Health Care by David Gratzer, City Journal Summer 2007

BTW I find you facts and figures totally fabricated and based on heresay (well a canadian told me blah blah blah so it must be true.) You act like a child who was denied candy before dinner.

I especially love the part in the article that discusses the life expectancy of the US which is 77 and not much different from other European countries. The articles states that when you take death from car accidents or violence out of the stats than the life expectancy is higher in the US. US healthcare is not horrible like you make it out to be. It is really quite superior.

Last edited by runnerup; 05-03-2009 at 02:13 PM.. Reason: link not responding
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
5,224 posts, read 5,010,608 times
Reputation: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by runnerup View Post
TM you seem to be totally blind to the other side of the issue. Here is an article that will broaden your horizon.

The Ugly Truth About Canadian Health Care by David Gratzer, City Journal Summer 2007 (http:// - broken link)

BTW I find you facts and figures totally fabricated and based on heresay (well a canadian told me blah blah blah so it must be true.) You act like a child who was denied candy before dinner.

I especially love the part in the article that discusses the life expectancy of the US which is 77 and not much different from other European countries. The articles states that when you take death from car accidents or violence out of the stats than the life expectancy is higher in the US. US healthcare is not horrible like you make it out to be. It is really quite superior.

I've read those articles as well.. I understand there are downsides.

Again..Canadian System is not the be all end all of healthcare systems.

What good is having "superior" healthcare if most have no access to it. Lose your insruance and see how great the system itself is, when you can't access it or you are financially ruined in order to gain access. .. or your insurance company denies you because you do not have enough coverage.

Point of the matter is we spend double GDP of other nations on our healthcare, yet we manage to have 47 million uninsured (20% of those are non citizens, which includes those here legally with greencards, visa's etc.). Government spends 44% of the total health care expenditures in this country and yet not all of it's citizens are actually covered.. vs the Swiss system where they spend 24% of their Lower GDP number on healthcare to subsidize the citizens required to pruchase insurance. Their insured rate is almost 99%!!! (and those uninsured are fined by the government).

Don't think the UK has an excellent system and innovation is dead. I just read an article in Diabetic Living that the UK has created a vaccine for Type I Diabetes and it is currently in clinical trials. So much for a "socialized" system of medicine stifling innovation.

You all keep coming back with wait times in Canada.. guess what. .there are wait times in the U.S. I made an appointment for a new endocronologist back at the end of Feb / early march.. first available appointment .. JUNE 5th!!!

Hospitals are NOT pleasant experiences.. I'm sure you'll find complaints from even American citizens about our hospitals and wait times. Hell I dread an ER because I'll be there for hours bleeding with a cut or sitting with a broken leg before I'm ever seen.

AGain.. I ponted to a study that showed the grand total of Canadian citiznes "flocking" to America for healthcare to be a whopping .5%.. and most of them are part time residents of this country. or snowbirds.

50% of all bankruptcies in this country are a result of medical bills.. which, btw. .then end up not getting paid.. and then guess what.. we all pay for it in yet even higher costs.

Our system, not our medicine, is a joke. More money goes into BS than goes into medicine. Your premium goes to pay out a 30% adminstrative overhead (vs 5% for medicaid, btw), the Millions of dollars a year a CEO gets paid and then the bonuses on top of that, payouts to shareholders, lobbying costs, advertising costs.. etc etc etc. Money doesn't go to the actual MEDICINE in this country..

Yet..insurance companies have placed themselves in the middle so much so that without insurance, any regular person couldn't possibly afford treatments, medications etc. My insulin supplies.. $600/month without insurance! That doesn't include the specialist visit every 3 months for regular routine blood work (visit without blood work will run me approx $250 when I go in June). Get sick, need to go to the hospital or god forbid get an illness such as cancer and you dont' have insurance.. well guess what.. you're financially ruined. Oh.. and if you DO have insurance and lose your job, COBRA runs out, you recover from your cancer .. good luck finding an insurance to pick you up after that (if you happen to be self employed).

You're right. our medicine is great.. our medicine is excellent. But what the hell good is it if no one can access it???

Other countries have innovation and technologies.. they have a higher mortality rate in births than we do (and that can't be explained away by violence or car accidents). They have better preventative measures than we do (because all their citizens actually can access the medical system) To say that other countries don't, is to insult them. If they are so bad and we are so great why did the WORLD HEALTH ORGINIZATION rate them higher than the U.S.. why isn't the U.S at the top of their list at #1.. I believe we are somewhere in the 30's!! FRANCE is #1.

No system will EVERY be perfect.. but for all the articles that talk about the downside to the Canadian system.. not one of them has been calling for an American system. We are looked at as what NOT to do with your medical system!

And.. I love how people keep throwing up Canada when I've clearly mentioned other systems like the French, German and better yet Swiss system! .. which the Swiss system si probably the closest to our system (their GdP is around 11%, ours is above 15%). THey have the second highest GDP in the world in healthcare expenditures but their gov't spends less and has a high rate of insured.

Oh.. btw.. if you think that drugs are just automatically approved .. guess again. I have an insulin pump.. when I first got it I had to fight the insurance company to get that.. six months it took. Then, just last year when I had insurance.. Mini Med had finally gotten FDA approval for the Glucose Sensor. This FDA approved device, with PROVEN results in diabetic patients like myself was deemed by my insurance company as "not proven" and "experimental" .. Denied 3x's until finally I fought and got it approved.. again.. around 6 - 8 months later.. So .. if you think this stuff doesn't happen in the U.s.. you are sorely sorely mistaken.. I've come across it first hand.

Last edited by TristansMommy; 05-03-2009 at 02:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 03:08 PM
 
48 posts, read 62,093 times
Reputation: 26
Your posts still remind me of a child. Are you of age to be in this forum? Again you throw out facts without backing them up with substantial internet sources. BTW I really want the UK's dental system. Have you seen their teeth!

The fact is that most people in the US get healthcare through their employer. You are trying to get them to drop their free insurance and instead "buy" their plans through higher taxes. Why would anyone agree to that. Especially if it will be substandard care.

33% uninsured is not that bad considering that we have 300 million people in the US. A lot of those people are people in their 20s who do not need it anyway. And I really don't care that illegals and people who came here on visas don't have insurance. The people who came here on visas are stealing jobs from hard working Americans and working for less money. I have no sympathy.

Why don't you just get a job that gives you health insurance. I promise you that would be the simplest way to resolve your problem.

Lady, stop complaining about wait times in rural PA and move to where there are more doctors. There are NO wait times where I live. You are a sensationalist and ridiculusly uneducated.

Quote:
Don't think the UK has an excellent system and innovation is dead. I just read an article in Diabetic Living that the UK has created a vaccine for Type I Diabetes and it is currently in clinical trials. So much for a "socialized" system of medicine stifling innovation.
Ok lets compare the percentage of innovation in the US of medical inventions versus the UK. I bet we win.

Quote:
Hospitals are NOT pleasant experiences.. I'm sure you'll find complaints from even American citizens about our hospitals and wait times. Hell I dread an ER because I'll be there for hours bleeding with a cut or sitting with a broken leg before I'm ever seen.
It's called triage. And a bleeding cut is not as important when Susie Q is dying of a heart attack. You are so self centered. Do you think the wait times will improve or get worse with UHC? Also just to let you know unless you are a hemophiliac the blood clots very quickly so you will not be sitting for hours bleeding.

Quote:
50% of all bankruptcies in this country are a result of medical bills.. which, btw. .then end up not getting paid.. and then guess what.. we all pay for it in yet even higher costs.
I don't believe you. Where are the facts to back this up. You are making up stats just to prove your point. And no I will not read your earlier posts as you always say so get over it.

Quote:
Get sick, need to go to the hospital or god forbid get an illness such as cancer and you dont' have insurance.. well guess what.. you're financially ruined. Oh.. and if you DO have insurance and lose your job, COBRA runs out, you recover from your cancer .. good luck finding an insurance to pick you up after that (if you happen to be self employed).
Sensationalism... My insuarance will pay for it so I will not be financially ruined. My grandmother had cancer and the insurance paid for it. And guess what little misinformed she still has her insurance. They didn't drop her. And another thing if I went back to work after a catastrophe than I would just get put on whatever plans the employer has provided.

[quote][/QUONo system will EVERY be perfect.. but for all the articles that talk about the downside to the Canadian system.. not one of them has been calling for an American system. We are looked at as what NOT to do with your medical system!
TE]

The people in the article did call for an american system. Did you even read it?

Quote:
Other countries have innovation and technologies.. they have a higher mortality rate in births than we do (and that can't be explained away by violence or car accidents). They have better preventative measures than we do (because all their citizens actually can access the medical system) To say that other countries don't, is to insult them. If they are so bad and we are so great why did the WORLD HEALTH ORGINIZATION rate them higher than the U.S.. why isn't the U.S at the top of their list at #1.. I believe we are somewhere in the 30's!! FRANCE is #1.
Lady your facts are so wrong! You have you not read earlier posts about the WHO study. It was done in 2000. It was not analyzing the quality of healthcare but the system itself. It was biased towards socialized medicine. You are so uninformed and obviously uneducated. Also I guess you meant lower birth mortality. But unlike you I check the facts before writing and we have a very similiar birth mortality rate to other western countries.

It seems you do not like the Canadian system. However you are willing to gamble that an American UHC will become more like the UK and not Canada. How do you know that this will not happen?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 03:32 PM
 
48 posts, read 62,093 times
Reputation: 26
Opps I meant 33 million uninsured not 33%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,252,821 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by runnerup View Post
Lady, stop complaining about wait times in rural PA and move to where there are more doctors. There are NO wait times where I live. You are a sensationalist and ridiculusly uneducated.
We have Hospitals here where I live (Gilbert Mercy and Banner Gateway) that GUARANTEE that when you come into the ER, you WILL BE SEEN by the ER Doctor - not nurse - PHYSICAN, within 15 minutes of arrival - quicker of course if it is life threatening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
5,224 posts, read 5,010,608 times
Reputation: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by runnerup View Post
Your posts still remind me of a child. Are you of age to be in this forum? Again you throw out facts without backing them up with substantial internet sources. BTW I really want the UK's dental system. Have you seen their teeth!
I'm spouting off facts that I have given links to in the many many threads I have been invovled with concerning this issue. You have not seen my other posts.. but EVERY FACT and STATISTIC I have mentioned on these boards have been backed up. I just dont' waste my time reposting them yet again.. on yet another thread about the healthcare issue.

BTW.. dental is an entirelly different issue. Dental is separately purchased from "medical" and is NOT considered "medical" that qualifies for medical coverage in the U.S.. so I don't know why you are throwing that into the mix.

Quote:
The fact is that most people in the US get healthcare through their employer. You are trying to get them to drop their free insurance and instead "buy" their plans through higher taxes. Why would anyone agree to that. Especially if it will be substandard care.
:
LOL. first off the insurance is not "FREE".. but then that mentality. that you think it is "FREE" is part of the problem with the healthcare system in the U.S. Your own article points to the fact that rising healthcare costs is the number one reason why average household income has DECREASED since 2000 because of the rising cost of health insurance.. but in case you missed that little tidbit in the article you linked to here it is:

Over the last five years, health-insurance premiums have more than doubled, leaving firms like General Motors on the brink of bankruptcy. Expensive health care has also hit workers in the pocketbook: it’s one of the reasons that median family income fell between 2000 and 2005 (despite a rise in overall labor costs). Health spending has surged past 16 percent of GDP. The number of uninsured Americans has risen, and even the insured seem dissatisfied.

Need we mention that part of the big reason the American autoworkers are so strapped is because of health care costs for their current employees AND retirees? Or how the number of uninsured in this country has upticked quite quickly in the U.S. AND how employers are now cutting back on actual benefits..leaving many UNDERINSURED (although they have a false sense of security that they are insured, only to find out their coverage does not cover certain things).

Quote:
33% uninsured is not that bad considering that we have 300 million people in the US. A lot of those people are people in their 20s who do not need it anyway. And I really don't care that illegals and people who came here on visas don't have insurance. The people who came here on visas are stealing jobs from hard working Americans and working for less money. I have no sympathy.
These people who are "stealing" jobs.. are people who are coming to America no different than our forefathers and our grandparents.. etc. ANd they are here LEGALLY.. which means they are not doing anything wrong in being here. Now.. that being said.. considering AGAIN.. that the U.S spends DOUBLE the amount of GDP (and quickly rising btw) and manages to have 11% uninsured (and AGAIN.. climbing.. wonder what those numbers are now that jobs are being lost and thereby insurance is being lost) While other countries spend HALF THE AMOUNT in percentage of GDP than we do , yet manage to have ALL their people covered So.. basically you think it's great that we spend more and get far less. Oh.. and our government , out of all the money spent on healthcare, manages to spend 44% of that expenditures and again.. not all of it's citizens are insured (this is medicaid/medicare). .. 11% plus and climbing remained uninsured.

Wow.. I guess you have really low expectations.

BTW.. again. . .we have the HIGHESTER % of our population (regardless of size..we are talking percentages here) NOT COVERED!!!

Quote:
Why don't you just get a job that gives you health insurance. I promise you that would be the simplest way to resolve your problem.
First.. I have been looking for a job .. since December.. and in this ecnomy I have gotten squat.. and i'm highly qualified for a decent position...

Now.. how many entrepeneurs have to give up their dream.. and possibly stifle THEIR innovation because of the high cost of health insurance and care. Don't you see something WRONG with that picture here. Being a SLAVE to a "company" for health benefits along. Here I am , trying to make a business for myself rather than have to work for someone else (personal responsibility no?) and possibly build my business to create more jobs.. but then have to give that up?? How SAD is that.. that we all have to be robotic drones for the corporate man because of health insurance. Why is that tied into employment anyway..

And it shouldn't be.. BTW.. its KILLING American business and global competition. When other companies in those countries that have socializes medicine do not have that added expense. I refer you to the information from the article about decresae wages DESPITE increased labor costs for U.S companies.


Quote:
Lady, stop complaining about wait times in rural PA and move to where there are more doctors. There are NO wait times where I live. You are a sensationalist and ridiculusly uneducated.
LOL.. you know nothing about me.. first of all.. I am originally from Long Island NY.. plenty of Dr's there.. and guess what.. still wait times to see a Dr. I had my mother in law visiting here from Europe.. she got sick.. I called our family Dr and was told hte next appointment was 3 weeks away!! BTW.. my DR.is in Allentown.. hardly RURAL PA!

Do not speak of what you do not know! BTW.. wait times in RURAL areas are usually far less. My mom in rural MT can go see her Dr at a drop of a dime! It's called population density!


Quote:
Ok lets compare the percentage of innovation in the US of medical inventions versus the UK. I bet we win.
Let's look at something here for a second. People will ALWAYS go where there is more money to be made. So YES.. they have come here because there is MORE MONEY to be made..for whatever reasons. However, don't you think that a DR. doing what he loves (because you have to have a love for what you are doing in ordre to be so dedicated to it) would do it in his own country if all things are equal. Do you seriously think that innovation would cease if the U. S stopped overpaying for it's medicines? BTW. or medicines are purchased at 50% what we pay for our own innovations around the world? Why do you think that is.. because we're stupid enough to pay DOUBLE!!

Americans seem to think that if it costs more it must be better. I seriously doubt people will stop creating and inventing new forms of medicine if we adopted a UHC too.. BTW. Dr's in UK and FRance and other socialized countries do quite well financially.

BTW.. Japan is considered the worlds most innovative country overall Japan is the Worlds Most Innovative Country - Report

It's called triage. And a bleeding cut is not as important when Susie Q is dying of a heart attack. You are so self centered. Do you think the wait times will improve or get worse with UHC? Also just to let you know unless you are a hemophiliac the blood clots very quickly so you will not be sitting for hours bleeding.

[/quote]

You call ME A child and then resort to name calling and calling me self centered.. which , btw, is in violation of CD rules. I haven't name called or been disrespectful to you.. I've given you facts and figures (and if you want the links to all that information then do a search on all my posts.. you'll find them. )

A heart attack patient wil not have to wait in an ER. They would be admitted right away and there heart pumping again.. so you're spouting nonsense. And yes.. the blood clots.. my point was you go to any ER there is a wait time.. when there are people there.. unless of course you are EMERGENT!!! It's called TRIAGE.. remember?? so heart attack patient will get in before other things

Quote:
I don't believe you. Where are the facts to back this up. You are making up stats just to prove your point. And no I will not read your earlier posts as you always say so get over it.
Other posters who have seen my threads and my posts know well where those facts came from as I have pointed to them. You don't want to do a simple search by my screen name to retrieve them.. that's up to you.. I don't need to prove anything to you because I know.. and others know that I HAVE backed up everything I've said time and time again.


Quote:
Sensationalism... My insuarance will pay for it so I will not be financially ruined. My grandmother had cancer and the insurance paid for it. And guess what little misinformed she still has her insurance. They didn't drop her. And another thing if I went back to work after a catastrophe than I would just get put on whatever plans the employer has provided.
Ah.. well if you are happy to be a slave to a job just for medical benefits you go right ahead. Some of us would like to actually CREATE jobs!! Go figure

AS for your grandmother.. well yes.. she stil has insurance (she's on medicare ).. but let's just pretend for as second that she is YOU and you and lets say that you left your job to open your own business, but guess what.. you go to purchase NEW insurance.. and .. what's this? You had a catastrophic illness.. well I'm sorry sir, we can't take you .. we are medically underwritten. OR you get offered a great position with a smaller company for more money, but they don't offer insurance because they are a small company (my mother works for a very small town as town clerk.. they didn't have insurance and she had to purchase her own, but couldn't purchase her own because of pre-existing condition)

Oh.. and also.. YOU being added to your employers plan will raise everyone's premium once you are on it and start using it. You'll cause your employer to have to spend MORE money by hiring you.. just a little tidbit I thought you'd want to know.


[quote][/QUONo system will EVERY be perfect.. but for all the articles that talk about the downside to the Canadian system.. not one of them has been calling for an American system. We are looked at as what NOT to do with your medical system!
TE]

The people in the article did call for an american system. Did you even read it?



Quote:
Lady your facts are so wrong! You have you not read earlier posts about the WHO study. It was done in 2000. It was not analyzing the quality of healthcare but the system itself. It was biased towards socialized medicine. You are so uninformed and obviously uneducated. Also I guess you meant lower birth mortality. But unlike you I check the facts before writing and we have a very similiar birth mortality rate to other western countries.
I never knocked AMERICAN MEDICINE.. I knocked the AMERICAN SYSTEM!!!!

And when you have system of medicine that FAILS SO MANY.. 33% of it's population IT'S GIONG TO AFFECT THE OVERALL HEALTH OF THE COUNTRY

WE were ranked in the 30's.. I think right above SLOVENIA by a DISTINGUISHED WORLD orginization.. they are not "biased" on socialized medicine.. just becuase they gave you results you didn't like they are biased..

I know my facts.. I know them well.. I've read the study...

Quote:
It seems you do not like the Canadian system. However you are willing to gamble that an American UHC will become more like the UK and not Canada. How do you know that this will not happen?
Are you serious with that question.. well.. if you create your OWN system.. taking the best that different socialized systems have to offer than it won't happen.. it's called learning from other's mistakes What is wrong with the Canadian system should not be adopted here. It's not the fact that it's socialized that gives it it's problems.. There are many other socialized models that do not have the same problems as the Canadian ones? just like it is NOT the fact that our system is entirely PRIVATIZED that makes it fail us.. ?? Actually the ones that work the best are the ones that combine both Private And Government!!! a BALANCE between the two that allows for access for all citizens AND less GDP spending .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,252,821 times
Reputation: 4937
I don't live in a "rural" area. I live in a Major Metro area. Over the last couple of months, I have been referred to a number of specialists including Cardiology, Orthopedist, Urology - and the longest "wait" time I had was the very next day - not weeks as TM seems to incur in PA.

I guess different parts of the country have larger numbers of specialists thereby allowing for quicker visits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
5,224 posts, read 5,010,608 times
Reputation: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
I don't live in a "rural" area. I live in a Major Metro area. Over the last couple of months, I have been referred to a number of specialists including Cardiology, Orthopedist, Urology - and the longest "wait" time I had was the very next day - not weeks as TM seems to incur in PA.

I guess different parts of the country have larger numbers of specialists thereby allowing for quicker visits.

aNd as YOU well know I lived on Long Island, NY . . very well populated .. not even CLOSE to rural and I always had to make appointments 3 months in advance...

And that last statement.. also true for parts of Canada.. it all depends on population density, specialists available.. etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2009, 04:17 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,659,903 times
Reputation: 2829
I live in Long Island as well and to get an appointment with a Specialist, you're waiting at least a month. And I have PPO insurance. And there are no shortage of doctors here.

I've never been seen in an ER in sooner than an hour, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top