Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2009, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HereinDenver View Post
So do you disagree that we need better public health system? better education, better preventative measures? Do we not need to tell those what could afford insurance to buy insurance rather than buying other non essentials? We are not in disagreement. I guess I'm in the field and I know that unless we make some changes, the problems will continue to grow, and we will continue to throw more and more money at it.
No, I"ve spent most of my career as a public health nurse, and I am in full agreement with PH principles. But you can't just push preventive (that is the word, BTW) measures. People are always going to get sick.

Most people w/o insurance are from working families whose employers don't offer it. There are also some self-employed who don't buy insurance. Have you looked at prices of individual policies? Very expensive for very little coverage. "Throwing money at it" could include such things as a tax credit for the self-employed and subsidies for those whose companies don't offer it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-01-2009, 05:23 PM
 
194 posts, read 329,811 times
Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
No, I"ve spent most of my career as a public health nurse, and I am in full agreement with PH principles. But you can't just push preventive (that is the word, BTW) measures. People are always going to get sick.

Most people w/o insurance are from working families whose employers don't offer it. There are also some self-employed who don't buy insurance. Have you looked at prices of individual policies? Very expensive for very little coverage. "Throwing money at it" could include such things as a tax credit for the self-employed and subsidies for those whose companies don't offer it.
I'm glad I'm talking to a nurse. Someone with true insight

Think of a typical compliant patient with DM. What care is needed? Education, medicine, labs twice a year, sees a doc or a nurse 2-3x a year?

Now think of your last poorly controlled DM patient. How much more does this patient cost the system? You and I know that genetics we can't control, but motivation and compliance is a HUGE problem!!

The fundamental cost of our system is cost, since cost is what prevent people from getting insurance.

I don't see how building more hospitals, hiring more nurse, docs would help. We need education above anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2009, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereinDenver View Post
I'm glad I'm talking to a nurse. Someone with true insight

Think of a typical compliant patient with DM. What care is needed? Education, medicine, labs twice a year, sees a doc or a nurse 2-3x a year?

Now think of your last poorly controlled DM patient. How much more does this patient cost the system? You and I know that genetics we can't control, but motivation and compliance is a HUGE problem!!

The fundamental cost of our system is cost, since cost is what prevent people from getting insurance.

I don't see how building more hospitals, hiring more nurse, docs would help. We need education above anything.
There are many things that can throw diabetes out of control; illness, stress, pregnancy, etc. To blame all this on the pt. is wrong. Yes, I've seen diabetics who don't follow their diets, take their meds, but you have to keep plugging away and hope that one day they will. Teens especially have a hard time being "compliant".

Who is going to do this education you propose? Health care professionals. Where are they going to do it? In an office. And if more people have insurance, more people are going to be diagnosed in the first place, and need all the care that is initially required, which will require more personnel and space.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2009, 05:49 PM
 
194 posts, read 329,811 times
Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
There are many things that can throw diabetes out of control; illness, stress, pregnancy, etc. To blame all this on the pt. is wrong. Yes, I've seen diabetics who don't follow their diets, take their meds, but you have to keep plugging away and hope that one day they will. Teens especially have a hard time being "compliant".

Who is going to do this education? Health care professionals. Where are they going to do it? In an office. And if more people have insurance, more people are going to be diagnosed in the first place, and need all the care that is initially required.
No one is blaming ALL of that on patients. If you do primary care at all, you know that motivation is the main reason. What percent of patients are compliant with a plan? This is not exclusive to DM.

OK. See it your way. We make insurance available for everyone. Who pays? No matter how you disguise it, it's the tax payers. Can't keep printing money at this rate! So you hire 10% more docs and nurses and administrators and techs and office space etc. So do you think this will solve the problem? Of course not. It's a bandage that makes you feel better.

One of the fundamental problem is that we are getting less and less healthy as a society. For what ever reason. We are more dependent on medicine to save us.

So how long will it take for us to run through the funding?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2009, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereinDenver View Post
One of the fundamental problem is that we are getting less and less healthy as a society. For what ever reason. We are more dependent on medicine to save us.

So how long will it take for us to run through the funding?
This is simply untrue. Death rates from virutally all causes are down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2009, 05:53 PM
 
194 posts, read 329,811 times
Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
This is simply untrue. Death rates from virutally all causes are down.
You are thinking of survival rates from diseases. It's a fact that we are getting more diseases, we just have better cures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2009, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920
Most people no longer get tuberculosis and/or a lot of other communicable diseases any more. We don't get diseases from dirty public water, etc. Women rarely die in childbirth any more. We get more chronic disease b/c people live longer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2009, 05:59 PM
 
194 posts, read 329,811 times
Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Most people no longer get tuberculosis and/or a lot of other communicable diseases any more. We don't get diseases from dirty public water, etc. WE get more chornic disease b/c people live longer to begin with.
Maybe you haven't heard of drug resistant TB making a come back? MRSA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2009, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,796,716 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereinDenver View Post
Maybe you haven't heard of drug resistant TB making a come back? MRSA?
Yes, but there are no TB epidemics in the US like there were in the 50s. MRSA is a new problem, but it is treatable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuberculosis

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/tub...risk%2Dfactors

"People from regions with high rates of TB — especially sub-Saharan Africa, India, China, the islands of Southeast Asia and Micronesia, and parts of the former Soviet Union — are more likely to develop TB. In the United States, more than half the people with TB were born in a different country."

Last edited by Katarina Witt; 03-01-2009 at 06:12 PM.. Reason: add info about TB
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2009, 06:08 PM
 
194 posts, read 329,811 times
Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Yes, but there are no TB epidemics like there were in the 50s. MRSA is a new problem, but it is treatable.
Both are very close to an epidemic.

They are not a huge problem from a cost perspecitve anywyas. The incidence of diabetes, htn, heart disease, cancer, joint disease are all on the rise. What percent of the health care cost do you think they represent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top