Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-22-2009, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,290,033 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

However, then Rahm Emanuel wouldn't have had his glorious crisis to work with.

I think that a person in Florida may have the answer and could have saved us from some really stupid laws. Here is what he suggested.

>There's about 40 million people over 50 in the work force.
Pay them $1 million apiece severance with stipulations.

1) They leave their jobs. Forty million job openings - Unemployment fixed.
2) They buy NEW American cars. Forty million cars ordered - Auto Industry
fixed.
3) They either buy a house or pay off their mortgage - Housing Crisis fixed.


It could have been so easy without Friday's ex post facto law the House passed and violated the Constitution with.

Now all you lefties get out your calculators and let out with one great big howl about how much that would cost. You know like over $1 trillion for the first bailout that DID NOT work, at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2009, 11:18 PM
 
3,020 posts, read 25,738,498 times
Reputation: 2806
Default Naw, there was a far easier fix......

This financial mess could have been easily avoided by just making a rule that prevented being able to resell the mortgages.

If the clowns that wrote all that paper had to hold and service it for a period, then they would have been stuck with the mess of their own making.

Pretty easy not to care what you do if you can make money and pass off the risk to somebody else, especially when the Greater Fool is there to buy it.

Make a holding period on mortgages so the guy that writes them must assume the risk. Something in the years, like 5 or 10 years.

That fix would have cost pretty close to nothing. Probably would not have any bad paper, least that we the People would have to bail out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2009, 12:33 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,833,891 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I think that a person in Florida may have the answer and could have saved us from some really stupid laws. Here is what he suggested.

>There's about 40 million people over 50 in the work force.
Pay them $1 million apiece severance with stipulations...

Now all you lefties get out your calculators and let out with one great big howl about how much that would cost. You know like over $1 trillion for the first bailout that DID NOT work, at all.
One doesn't need a calculator to see the ridiculousness of this proposal, and I'm not talking about redistributing wealth to a select few. IIRC, this idea was first put forth by the genius that is Rush Limbaugh and has been repeated a few times since.

They don't realize that their attempt to look like a genius makes them look utterly clueless. To put that in perspective, those that have passed judgment that $1T bail out was huge, are now promoting a $40T plan. Nice! (Hint: 1 million-million = 1 trillion).

so you think (for whatever personal/political reasoning you may have) $1T failed and are promoting this insane $40T plan from someone. (Hint: 1 million-million = 1 trillion... no calculator needed for that one).

Last edited by EinsteinsGhost; 03-23-2009 at 01:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2009, 01:08 AM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,790,059 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
One doesn't need a calculator to see the ridiculousness of this proposal, and I'm not talking about redistributing the wealth to a select few. IIRC, this idea was first put forth by the genius that is Rush Limbaugh and has been repeated since. Little do they realize how little thought they put together for their ideas. To put that in perspective, so you think (for whatever personal/political reasoning you may have) $1T failed and are promoting this insane $40T plan from someone. (Hint: 1 million-million = 1 trillion).
Design a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will use it. Limberger math

Cosmic dude I'm with you... it should never been allowed to be, but here we are trying not to be global deadbeats on a bad check written by neoconservative ideology. Haven't got the sense god gave geese.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2009, 01:19 AM
 
1,599 posts, read 2,949,435 times
Reputation: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
One doesn't need a calculator to see the ridiculousness of this proposal, and I'm not talking about redistributing wealth to a select few. IIRC, this idea was first put forth by the genius that is Rush Limbaugh and has been repeated a few times since.

They don't realize that their attempt to look like a genius makes them look utterly clueless. To put that in perspective, those that have passed judgment that $1T bail out was huge, are now promoting a $40T plan. Nice! (Hint: 1 million-million = 1 trillion).

so you think (for whatever personal/political reasoning you may have) $1T failed and are promoting this insane $40T plan from someone. (Hint: 1 million-million = 1 trillion... no calculator needed for that one).
Lesson to be learned here= stop listening to right-wing entertainers for serious solutions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top