Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Term Limits?
No 4 11.43%
2 years 3 8.57%
4 or 6 years 19 54.29%
8 or 10 years 5 14.29%
10-15 years 3 8.57%
16-20 years 0 0%
20-30 years 0 0%
20-40 years 0 0%
40 years or more 1 2.86%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:00 PM
 
1,515 posts, read 3,332,506 times
Reputation: 450

Advertisements

There seems to be alot of controversy lately (well, over the past 40 years) about Congress being corrupt and only serving their own interests (to get reelected). Some people believe that it is time for term limits. It does have it's merits, it would slow down the influence of lobbyists because they wouldn't be able to work on one person for 40 years. It could allow for all states to be totally equally represented because senior members get important committee assignments, therefore if one Congressman is the chairman of the Ways and Means committee, he will likely remain it for several years, thus leading to one state or district being disproportionally represented for a very long time, term limits would remove this.

There are other benefits, as well as drawbacks, the main being that genuinely good Congressmen may be forced into retirement. The second, if you have a very senior member of Congress in your district, you will likely get alot of pork (Jack Murtha or Sen. Stevens anyone?) which does tend to benefit only one district.

The idea isn't radical, and it could be implemented just as the 22nd amendment (establishing term limits for Presidents was, just 58 years ago).

So should we have term limits, and I am attaching a poll for how long they should be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,461,656 times
Reputation: 4586
Yes we most definitely should. Pelosi wanting to shield lawmakers from investigations says enough for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
I'd limit to 4, 2year terms for the House.

2, 6 year terms for the Senate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Texas...and proud of it.
749 posts, read 947,038 times
Reputation: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
Yes we most definitely should. Pelosi wanting to shield lawmakers from investigations says enough for me.

Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid and that guy who switched parties last week are a few examples.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:17 PM
 
4,604 posts, read 8,231,864 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
I'd limit to 4, 2year terms for the House.

2, 6 year terms for the Senate.
I tend to agree with this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:30 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,752,619 times
Reputation: 3146
We already have term limits, you can and should, vote out your elected representatives when they come up for re-election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:38 PM
 
1,515 posts, read 3,332,506 times
Reputation: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
We already have term limits, you can and should, vote out your elected representatives when they come up for re-election.
Hoboken has not unseated an Congressperson since 1970. I just looked that up.

A couple have died, and a couple went to be Governors. Not necessarily a bad, just interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:42 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,670,280 times
Reputation: 7943
No way. We have term limits already. It's called the voters.

In any job, there is a learning curve. I don't see how keeping a permanent group of amateurs in office helps us.

If you think that all government is bad, I can see why you'd support term limits. You wouldn't want anyone to become experienced enough so that they can actually be productive and act as mentors for more junior representatives.

Experience is good, in whatever job you have. A desire to constantly "throw the bums out" is based on a pessimism that I don't have in me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:46 PM
 
1,653 posts, read 1,170,588 times
Reputation: 442
We have term limits I remember the contract with America had term limits in it. The Republicans didn't break the contract did they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,752,619 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canerican View Post
Hoboken has not unseated an Congressperson since 1970. I just looked that up.

A couple have died, and a couple went to be Governors. Not necessarily a bad, just interesting.

Absolutely true, the feds have unseated a couple. It still doesn't mitigate the fact that the people obviously like there representation (I am the conservative in Hudson County so I am usually not too happy) so they deserve what they want, and what they get.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top