Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-19-2011, 02:51 PM
 
3,153 posts, read 3,597,789 times
Reputation: 1080

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
You got that wrong!

The Government never lies!

Get your facts straight!
Almost 5 o'clock. Time for your medication..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2011, 03:44 PM
 
Location: The United States of Amnesia
1,355 posts, read 1,923,780 times
Reputation: 686
9-11 was not an inside job. Several terrorists went to flying school and became experts. They got passed through TSA agents and hijacked the planes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 04:00 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,502,845 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apples&Oranges View Post
I started studying the subject online and the twin towers DO look exactly like controlled demolition!

I also looked at the original hole in the Pentagon and it was no bigger than a garage door. And where the plane engines and tail should have hit the building, the windows are not even cracked.

Now I don't know what to think.
I don't know.

If it was it would make a great "in" to go seal off the border betweenRussia, China and Central Eurasia.

It'd be like a chess move except you just took Africa.

If it wasn't an inside job I'd feel a tiny bit better about going over there and drawing a line in the sand. (no pun intended)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 05:22 PM
 
1,019 posts, read 591,096 times
Reputation: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
And the really neat part is, Saddam Hussein himself was flying not one but BOTH of the planes that hit the Towers. That's why they didn't hit at the same time.

That's what Uncle Dick said, anyhow.

And he should know, if anyone does.
Are you attempting to be profound (fail) or idiotic (success)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 05:30 PM
 
76 posts, read 112,334 times
Reputation: 119
If one were to examine the recorded videos of the event, it is clear that explosion clouds appear
in strategic order, and residue on the iron beams indicate a particular type of explossives. And
building "7" no evidents of an aircraft wreaking havoc with that particular structure. I encourage people to do the research, there is plenty of info on the event.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,170 posts, read 19,262,442 times
Reputation: 14922
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaTrang View Post
Are you attempting to be profound (fail) or idiotic (success)?
If you don't understand, it's probably because you can't, don't, and never will...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,823 posts, read 19,518,800 times
Reputation: 9619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Pissedoff View Post
If one were to examine the recorded videos of the event, it is clear that explosion clouds appear
in strategic order, and residue on the iron beams indicate a particular type of explossives.
And
building "7" no evidents of an aircraft wreaking havoc with that particular structure. I encourage people to do the research, there is plenty of info on the event.
false and false

Why is it when the twoofers talk about bld7, people never:

1. Admit that the building got BADLY damaged when the towers fell:

a) the entire front fascia was sheared off

b) a 12-16 story gash(hole) in the corner(main supports)(Proves the FACT that there was MASSIVE structural damage)

2. Admit that there was an entire ConED substation(electric plant) below the building. (this article PROVES the substation and the new one rebuilt in May04,, It also gives a good description of the transformers)

Lower Manhattan Development Corporation - GOVERNOR PATAKI JOINS CON EDISON TO MARK OPENING OF ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION AT 7 WORLD TRADE CENTER

3. Admit that the building had 20 or more back up generators (4 on the 23rd floor, 3 on the 7th floor, 14 on the 5th floor, 1 on the 8th floor w/fuel tank, 4 on the 46th floor, 1 on the 9th floor)(Proves the FACT of many things that could have BLOWN up within the building supporting the statements of "heard explosions")

4. Admit that the building had 22 main Transformers(which can explode if heated(full of oil))(some of them 2 stories tall) and 2 dry transformers (10 1st floor, 12 5th floor, 2 7th floor)(proves the FACT of more things that could have blown up)

5. Admit that the Fuel source for those generators was stored in the building and equaled 18 tankers (18,000 gallons on the 2nd floor, and 48,000 in the lower level, 300 gallons on the 23rd floor, 300 gallons on the 5th floor, 100 gallons on the 9th floor, 300 gallons on the 7th floor)(proves the FACT of a major fuel source, along with all the office furnature)

6. Admit the there was LP gas lines running throughout the building

7. Admit that the Penthouse fell FIRST

8. Admit that the building did NOT fall symmetrically it collapsed from the center(the north wall even covered the debris

9. Admit that it did NOT fall with in its footprint, it covered "barkley street" and caused SIGNIFICANT DAMAGED(fell onto) another building (30 west broadway) and the Verizon building( just some logic here cant be in its "own footprint if it went OUTSIDE of its footprint)(ABSOLUTELY proves that it was not a PERFECT symmetrical fall)

10. Admit that the FIREMEN, said the fire could not be CONTROLLED

A) I will give just two,,,,"We walked over by number Seven World Trade Center as it was burning and saw this 40-plus story building with fire on nearly all floors." –FDNY Lieutenant Robert LaRocca

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...HIC/9110081.PD (broken link)

b). The major concern at that time was number Seven, building number Seven, which had taken a big hit from the north tower. When it fell, it ripped steel out from between the third and sixth floors across the facade on Vesey Street. We were concerned that the fires on several floors and the missing steel would result in the building collapsing. –FDNY Chief Frank Fellini

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110217.PDF (broken link)

11. Admit that there was a problem with the water supply(NO WATER)

12 the only mention "3 buildings" but not the other 10 buildings were destroyed that day in NYC

13. Admit that to wire a building.:

.......a) would take months.

.......b) beams would HAVE to be cut ,making the building NOT safe to go into for months prior to the collapse(proves that there is not way the building could have been imploded since monday sept 10 was a WORK DAY)

.......c) explosives don't like fire and heat

........d) that the term "pull" is NOT used in Explosive demos
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Currently I physically reside on the 3rd planet from the sun
2,220 posts, read 1,880,687 times
Reputation: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apples&Oranges View Post
I started studying the subject online and the twin towers DO look exactly like controlled demolition!

I also looked at the original hole in the Pentagon and it was no bigger than a garage door. And where the plane engines and tail should have hit the building, the windows are not even cracked.

Now I don't know what to think.
Some will congratulate you for taking the red pill, others will mock you and tell you to put on your tinfoil hat.

I don't know.

I don't put it beyond the realm of possibility and there is evidence supporting this theory. People who believe this are condescendingly called truthers by those who don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2011, 12:08 AM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,340,608 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
false and false

Why is it when the twoofers talk about bld7, people never:

1. Admit that the building got BADLY damaged when the towers fell:

a) the entire front fascia was sheared off

b) a 12-16 story gash(hole) in the corner(main supports)(Proves the FACT that there was MASSIVE structural damage)

2. Admit that there was an entire ConED substation(electric plant) below the building. (this article PROVES the substation and the new one rebuilt in May04,, It also gives a good description of the transformers)

Lower Manhattan Development Corporation - GOVERNOR PATAKI JOINS CON EDISON TO MARK OPENING OF ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION AT 7 WORLD TRADE CENTER

3. Admit that the building had 20 or more back up generators (4 on the 23rd floor, 3 on the 7th floor, 14 on the 5th floor, 1 on the 8th floor w/fuel tank, 4 on the 46th floor, 1 on the 9th floor)(Proves the FACT of many things that could have BLOWN up within the building supporting the statements of "heard explosions")

4. Admit that the building had 22 main Transformers(which can explode if heated(full of oil))(some of them 2 stories tall) and 2 dry transformers (10 1st floor, 12 5th floor, 2 7th floor)(proves the FACT of more things that could have blown up)

5. Admit that the Fuel source for those generators was stored in the building and equaled 18 tankers (18,000 gallons on the 2nd floor, and 48,000 in the lower level, 300 gallons on the 23rd floor, 300 gallons on the 5th floor, 100 gallons on the 9th floor, 300 gallons on the 7th floor)(proves the FACT of a major fuel source, along with all the office furnature)

6. Admit the there was LP gas lines running throughout the building

7. Admit that the Penthouse fell FIRST

8. Admit that the building did NOT fall symmetrically it collapsed from the center(the north wall even covered the debris

9. Admit that it did NOT fall with in its footprint, it covered "barkley street" and caused SIGNIFICANT DAMAGED(fell onto) another building (30 west broadway) and the Verizon building( just some logic here cant be in its "own footprint if it went OUTSIDE of its footprint)(ABSOLUTELY proves that it was not a PERFECT symmetrical fall)

10. Admit that the FIREMEN, said the fire could not be CONTROLLED

A) I will give just two,,,,"We walked over by number Seven World Trade Center as it was burning and saw this 40-plus story building with fire on nearly all floors." –FDNY Lieutenant Robert LaRocca

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...HIC/9110081.PD (broken link)

b). The major concern at that time was number Seven, building number Seven, which had taken a big hit from the north tower. When it fell, it ripped steel out from between the third and sixth floors across the facade on Vesey Street. We were concerned that the fires on several floors and the missing steel would result in the building collapsing. –FDNY Chief Frank Fellini

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110217.PDF (broken link)

11. Admit that there was a problem with the water supply(NO WATER)

12 the only mention "3 buildings" but not the other 10 buildings were destroyed that day in NYC

13. Admit that to wire a building.:

.......a) would take months.

.......b) beams would HAVE to be cut ,making the building NOT safe to go into for months prior to the collapse(proves that there is not way the building could have been imploded since monday sept 10 was a WORK DAY)

.......c) explosives don't like fire and heat

........d) that the term "pull" is NOT used in Explosive demos

You're "pulling" your own leg, dude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2011, 02:09 AM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,514 posts, read 33,350,590 times
Reputation: 7625
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
You're "pulling" your own leg, dude.
How is he? By posting facts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top