For all you climate change deniers (health care, myths, insurance, election)

[AxisMundi]

Originally Posted by compJockey

YOU thought it had to do with "tempurture".
You were mistaken.

YOU thought it had been refuted - but refuse to post any evidence of that.
You are mistaken again.



Prove that you can read, first.

Trranslation of above...

I cannot substantiate my "evidence".

[compJockey]

Originally Posted by AxisMundi

Trranslation of above...

I cannot substantiate my "evidence".

If you read the link, and try to understand it - but you still don't...
At that point I will attempt to explain it to you.

[Fred Derf]

The hockey stick graph goes back to 2001 and it was found to have a flawed approach. New studies, and in particular one that was completed in 2008, have reached the same conclusion with a sound academic approach. That study can be found here:
Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia — PNAS

While the original hockey stick graph was found to have reached an accurate conclusion it was still dismissed under the principal of "Method Wrong + Answer Correct = Bad Science".

Still, the scientific community has moved on since 2001. I suggest that some of you keep up.

[GOPATTA2D]

Originally Posted by Bluefly

Dear blind poster:

The last degree increase has nothing to do with the current degree increase or the impacts it is proving to have.

Please expand. If one degree increase in temp will flood cities as you contend, why are waterfront cities circa 1AD not under water today, 2000 years later? We are after all 1 degree Celcius warmer.

[AxisMundi]

Originally Posted by compJockey

If you read the link, and try to understand it - but you still don't...
At that point I will attempt to explain it to you.

Still don't get it, do you.

The Hockey Stick fallacy has been around for years.

It was debunked long ago, and gets debunked every time it rears it's ugly head.

[compJockey]

Originally Posted by AxisMundi

Still don't get it, do you.

The Hockey Stick fallacy has been around for years.

It was debunked long ago, and gets debunked every time it rears it's ugly head.

So you are saying that any graph that has a massive increase is automatically false.

You don't realize how asinine that is?

[GOPATTA2D]

Originally Posted by compJockey

So you are saying that any graph that has a massive increase is automatically false.

You don't realize how asinine that is?

Not all. Only those that utilized bad data.

[sanrene]

So you are saying that any graph that has a massive increase is automatically false.

You don't realize how asinine that is?

No, it is the underlying data and structure that is faulty. He also conveniently left out a couple of "events" from the data.

surely you've heard the phrase - Garbage In, Garbage Out?

[compJockey]

Originally Posted by sanrene

No, it is the underlying data and structure that is faulty. He also conveniently left out a couple of "events" from the data.

Ahh, sanrene.
You know how to provide a link - why don't you help out your fellow denier?
Why don't you provide a link refuting the measurements of Co2?
At least I know you understand how to post a link.

surely you've heard the phrase - Garbage In, Garbage Out?

Yes, you demonstrate that effectively every time you post.

[compJockey]

Originally Posted by Fred Derf

The hockey stick graph goes back to 2001 and it was found to have a flawed approach. New studies, and in particular one that was completed in 2008, have reached the same conclusion with a sound academic approach. That study can be found here:
Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia — PNAS

While the original hockey stick graph was found to have reached an accurate conclusion it was still dismissed under the principal of "Method Wrong + Answer Correct = Bad Science".

Still, the scientific community has moved on since 2001. I suggest that some of you keep up.

The graph I provided did not show temperature.
It showed measurements of Co2 and projected Co2.