Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,793,990 times
Reputation: 3587

Advertisements

Hannity made that crystal clear. The Republicans do not want to do anything on health care. Let's see how far the Democrats have went on the issue: We started with wanting a single payer system similar to national heath systems in Canada and the UK. This is really the best way to go- everybody pays IN and everybody benefits.
That was not good enough so we went to the "compromise" public private mix. Private insurance with a "public option"- mainly for those who have employers who are not providing them ANY insurance right now and dumping their employees on the rest of us who do have insurance. But that is not good enough for the Republicans either.
So now, according to some reports, we have "compromised on the compromise" and went to the so called "private non profit coops" which would get some government "seed money" to begin but be totally ran by a private board of directors elected by their members- similar to the EMC that the government started in the 30s to for rural electric power.
Now the Republicans say that is not good enough either. Are you folks starting to get the picture here?? You can see that doing nothing is far more important to the Republicans than doing something. That is why they did nothing for 8 years while in power on this issue. This while they collect millions from big pharma and big insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:23 AM
 
3,153 posts, read 3,598,276 times
Reputation: 1080
People who are not happy with how the US is run and our system and manner of living, should seriously think about leaving. I mean..why not move to a place where things are done to ones liking. So if one likes Socialism for example, they should move to a Socialist country instead of trying to change our Country into something that it is not, nor will ever be. Doesn't that make sense to most fair minded people (not loons)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:41 AM
 
6,565 posts, read 14,309,016 times
Reputation: 3229
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdavid002 View Post
People who are not happy with how the US is run and our system and manner of living, should seriously think about leaving. I mean..why not move to a place where things are done to ones liking. So if one likes Socialism for example, they should move to a Socialist country instead of trying to change our Country into something that it is not, nor will ever be. Doesn't that make sense to most fair minded people (not loons)
--Maybe because that isn't how our society has worked, EVER.?

--That change is affected by people that STAY here and try to change the imperfections of our society for the better? (in their opinion of course)

--That this is an evolving democracy and always has been?

Your statement is pretty obtuse and flies in the face of what this country is about. So perhaps if anyone should leave, it should be you.

I guess MLK Jr. should have just left along with all the other black people, eh?

I guess women should have just left?

I guess gays should just leave?

I guess that those who think marijuana should be legal should just leave?

ETC.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,199 posts, read 4,322,460 times
Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Hannity made that crystal clear. The Republicans do not want to do anything on health care
I thought Limbaugh was in charge of the GOP?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:46 AM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,838,936 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by allydriver View Post
I thought Limbaugh was in charge of the GOP?
he is, michael steele is a pawn not approved by limbaugh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:48 AM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,838,936 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdavid002 View Post
People who are not happy with how the US is run and our system and manner of living, should seriously think about leaving. I mean..why not move to a place where things are done to ones liking. So if one likes Socialism for example, they should move to a Socialist country instead of trying to change our Country into something that it is not, nor will ever be. Doesn't that make sense to most fair minded people (not loons)
hmm well why should other countries allow the US to change the way they do things
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,199 posts, read 4,322,460 times
Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by city414 View Post
he is, michael steele is a pawn not approved by limbaugh
I thought this was about what Hannity wants for the GOP?

You guys need to synchronize your talking points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,802,305 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
Hannity made that crystal clear. The Republicans do not want to do anything on health care. Let's see how far the Democrats have went on the issue: We started with wanting a single payer system similar to national heath systems in Canada and the UK. This is really the best way to go- everybody pays IN and everybody benefits.
That was not good enough so we went to the "compromise" public private mix. Private insurance with a "public option"- mainly for those who have employers who are not providing them ANY insurance right now and dumping their employees on the rest of us who do have insurance. But that is not good enough for the Republicans either.
So now, according to some reports, we have "compromised on the compromise" and went to the so called "private non profit coops" which would get some government "seed money" to begin but be totally ran by a private board of directors elected by their members- similar to the EMC that the government started in the 30s to for rural electric power.
Now the Republicans say that is not good enough either. Are you folks starting to get the picture here?? You can see that doing nothing is far more important to the Republicans than doing something. That is why they did nothing for 8 years while in power on this issue. This while they collect millions from big pharma and big insurance.
I'm surprised the Republicans would even want that.

One minute they scream we shouldn't be involved in private business matters (IE: the bailouts) but then they want to give TAXPAYER money to a company that is going to be PRIVATELY ran and will deliver some pretty bad results.

Kent Conrad proposed 6 BILLION in start-up costs. That money could be used to fund a SINGLE PAYER system...

Quote:
Q:WHAT ARE THE DISADVANTAGES?
A:Many Democrats worry that co-ops would be too weak to provide any real competition to the private insurance industry. Public plan advocate Senator John Rockefeller points out that healthcare cooperatives have been tried in the past to provide medical care to rural areas. Thousands were formed and almost all of them failed.
Conservative critics argue that the co-operatives would just be another form of government-run insurance because of the role the government would play in setting them up and overseeing their operations.
Q+A: Co-ops in focus in U.S. healthcare debate | Special Coverage | Reuters (http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-HealthcareReform/idUSTRE5756FY20090806?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandCha nnel=0 - broken link)


NOW! Blog » Rockefeller Destroys the Co-op Idea: Unregulated and Unproven
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,203,642 times
Reputation: 6963
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdavid002 View Post
People who are not happy with how the US is run and our system and manner of living, should seriously think about leaving. I mean..why not move to a place where things are done to ones liking. So if one likes Socialism for example, they should move to a Socialist country instead of trying to change our Country into something that it is not, nor will ever be. Doesn't that make sense to most fair minded people (not loons)
I think you're right. That's why the Confederacy should have been allowed to exist. That would have created less problems in this time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 08:55 AM
 
3,153 posts, read 3,598,276 times
Reputation: 1080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett_Butler View Post
--Maybe because that isn't how our society has worked, EVER.?

--That change is affected by people that STAY here and try to change the imperfections of our society for the better? (in their opinion of course)

--That this is an evolving democracy and always has been?

Your statement is pretty obtuse and flies in the face of what this country is about. So perhaps if anyone should leave, it should be you.

I guess MLK Jr. should have just left along with all the other black people, eh?

I guess women should have just left?

I guess gays should just leave?

I guess that those who think marijuana should be legal should just leave?

ETC.....
1 - people should go where they would be most happy...not force their views on the rest of us.

2 - your argument is weak at best

3 - this is a Republic, not a Democracy

Moderator cut: Discuss topic, not posters

Last edited by gallowsCalibrator; 08-18-2009 at 11:15 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top