Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-11-2009, 09:36 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,966,939 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Obama WH falsely downplaying risks of retreat in Afghanistan: Military, intel sources

Where did the idea come that the Taliban are "moderates"?

Quote:
It comes not from Afghanistan, but from the left wing of the Democratic Party. They have increased pressure on Obama to get out of Afghanistan, and the Nobel Peace Prize was specifically intended to help in that effort. The Left wants a way out of the war, and the Obama administration has begun floating trial balloons to help sell this as something other than a retreat, if Obama goes along with it.
I don't think it will fly - the notion that the Taliban can be divorced from AQ.

Quote:
The Taliban are not moderates, and they share the same ideological, political, and tactical goals as Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri. Anyone saying anything differently is simply selling a false argument for a dishonorable retreat in the face of our enemies.
Bob Kerrey: Obama's Nobel and His Obligation to Afghanistan - WSJ.com

Quote:
Afghanistan is also not Iraq. No serious leader in Kabul is asking us to leave. Instead we are being asked to withdraw by American leaders who begin their analysis with the presumption that victory is not possible. They seem to want to ensure defeat by leaving at the very moment when our military leader on the ground has laid out a coherent and compelling strategy for victory.
Are Obama advisers downplaying Afghanistan dangers? | McClatchy

Quote:
WASHINGTON -- As the Obama administration reconsiders its Afghanistan policy, White House officials are minimizing warnings from the intelligence community, the military and the State Department about the risks of adopting a limited strategy focused on al Qaida, U.S. intelligence, diplomatic and military officials told McClatchy.
And why would they be attempting to do that? To "redefine" the Taliban as a moderate, reasonable entity?

Quote:
led forces have much closer ties to al Qaida now than they did before 9/11, would allow the terrorist network to re-establish bases in Afghanistan and would help Osama bin Laden export his radical brand of Islam to Afghanistan's neighbors and beyond, the officials said.
We can see where obama is going with this, can't we?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2009, 10:19 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,667,797 times
Reputation: 7485
Thank you for posting the links to the various opinion peices concerning Afghanistan. They just highlight the extremely difficult decisions that President Obama and the administration must make concerning America's future in Afghanistan and the overall fight against terrorism throughout the world.

These opinion peices showcase the extreme differences that exist among individuals outside the actual decision making process and provide for a lively background noise to the policy makers who will actually shape our strategy in Afghanistan.

Last edited by mohawkx; 10-11-2009 at 10:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,531,102 times
Reputation: 27720
The agenda is changing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 10:39 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,428,613 times
Reputation: 40736
"It comes not from Afghanistan, but from the left wing of the Democratic Party. They have increased pressure on Obama to get out of Afghanistan, and the Nobel Peace Prize was specifically intended to help in that effort."

Please DO explain how it is the left wing of the Democratic Party arranged the awarding of the Nobel to Obama in order to increase the pressure on him to withdraw? You must think they'te absolute genius.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,667,797 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
"It comes not from Afghanistan, but from the left wing of the Democratic Party. They have increased pressure on Obama to get out of Afghanistan, and the Nobel Peace Prize was specifically intended to help in that effort."

Please DO explain how it is the left wing of the Democratic Party arranged the awarding of the Nobel to Obama in order to increase the pressure on him to withdraw? You must think they'te absolute genius.
They are Opinion Peices. You don't actually have to prove the facts in opinion peices. You just have to link them to your post to support your agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top