Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-20-2009, 01:42 PM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,680,664 times
Reputation: 1962

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by groar View Post
there are bdsm clubs.

it's not my thing but as long as it's practiced by consenting adults, i have no problem with it.

comparing a fetish to a sexual orientation is inaccurate in any case.

Why is that appears to me this "fetish" seems to have the same type of issues as people who want to be openly gay and or etc. What about the crossers... tranny etc is that a choice or are we going to say they are like gay people and are "born that way". I am starting to form alot of ideas that most of the so called lifestyle choices and sexual orientations are often choices not born into it. I'm not saying you do not have tendancies but I also would like to know how we explain the millions of people who are bi-sexual. Is bi-sexually a choice and can they marry a man and a women together. Sexual fetishes can be just as important to many want to comes to partners and your lifestyle and who you love. BDSM also is not a fetish even if wikipedia says it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2009, 01:46 PM
 
Location: 38°14′45″N 122°37′53″W
4,156 posts, read 11,007,321 times
Reputation: 3439
Quote:
Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll View Post
I know and many get "shutdown" due to public pressure.

Really? Where? I can think of more than a handful that have been up and running for at least a decade or so...

it's not the BDSM that's 'illegal', but the business transaction ($$$ for services, and no it's not sex) that is. FYI. (at least not here in CA.)

Last edited by bellalunatic; 10-20-2009 at 02:56 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:35 PM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,391,510 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll View Post
Why is that appears to me this "fetish" seems to have the same type of issues as people who want to be openly gay and or etc.
What sort of "issues" are you talking about? If you want to live an "openly BDSM lifestyle" (I suppose, wearing leather and walking around with riding crops).... who cares? As long as you don't have sex outside of spaces designated for sex, society should have no problem with it. Nobody prevents people who engage in BDSM from marrying (unless it's gay BDSM), and nobody will know you engage in BDSM unless you tell them. It's unlike gays and lesbians who cannot even talk about their significant others at work without "broadcasting" their sexuality.


Quote:
Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll
What about the crossers... tranny etc is that a choice
It's a choice to act on any desire you have inside of you, but I don't think people CHOOSE to be transsexual. Cross dressers are often heterosexual men who like women's clothing. A choice? Probably not, if you think about it. A choice to ACT on it, yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll
I am starting to form alot of ideas that most of the so called lifestyle choices and sexual orientations are often choices not born into it. I'm not saying you do not have tendancies but I also would like to know how we explain the millions of people who are bi-sexual.
What? Bisexuality is an UNCHOSEN sexuality. It just "happens."

You are making a common mistake. "Sexuality" and "sexual behavior" are two different things. You can be gay and engage in straight sex acts, just as you can be straight and engage in gay sex acts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll
Is bi-sexually a choice and can they marry a man and a women together.
Since marriage should be a contract between TWO people for the purposes of making things easy for the government benefits that go along with marriage, then no, they should pick one. If they want to be "spiritually" married/committed, etc. to three or five people, that is a different story.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll
Sexual fetishes can be just as important to many want to comes to partners and your lifestyle and who you love. BDSM also is not a fetish even if wikipedia says it is.
How is BDSM not a fetish? It's like the poster child for fetishes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:37 PM
 
7,380 posts, read 15,669,719 times
Reputation: 4975
Quote:
Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll View Post
Why is that appears to me this "fetish" seems to have the same type of issues as people who want to be openly gay and or etc. What about the crossers... tranny etc is that a choice or are we going to say they are like gay people and are "born that way". I am starting to form alot of ideas that most of the so called lifestyle choices and sexual orientations are often choices not born into it. I'm not saying you do not have tendancies but I also would like to know how we explain the millions of people who are bi-sexual. Is bi-sexually a choice and can they marry a man and a women together. Sexual fetishes can be just as important to many want to comes to partners and your lifestyle and who you love. BDSM also is not a fetish even if wikipedia says it is.
being bisexual is not a choice. the choice comes into it if you decide to stick with one gender or another as a bisexual. marry a man and woman together? being bisexual doesn't mean you constantly have to be having sex with both men and women, contrary to what the jerry springer show might teach us. it just means that you are attracted to both genders and might have a sexual relationship with a person of either gender at any given time.

a completely gay person could choose to sleep with or marry someone of the opposite gender, but they can't choose who they're attracted to any more than you can. and odds are they would be miserable and so would their spouse.

i don't think that being transgendered is a choice - deciding to live as a gender other than your physical one, whether or not that involves surgery, is a choice, but it's an understandable one for people whose bodies are the wrong gender.

i don't see how bdsm, whether you call it a lifestyle or a fetish, has the same issues as homosexuality. straight people who are into bdsm can get married, they can introduce people to their partners and whatnot, and no one knows or cares what they get up to in the bedroom unless they choose to make that information public. if you're gay, and you introduce people to your same sex partner, people know you're gay and judge you accordingly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:54 PM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,680,664 times
Reputation: 1962
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
What sort of "issues" are you talking about? If you want to live an "openly BDSM lifestyle" (I suppose, wearing leather and walking around with riding crops).... who cares? As long as you don't have sex outside of spaces designated for sex, society should have no problem with it. Nobody prevents people who engage in BDSM from marrying (unless it's gay BDSM), and nobody will know you engage in BDSM unless you tell them. It's unlike gays and lesbians who cannot even talk about their significant others at work without "broadcasting" their sexuality.




It's a choice to act on any desire you have inside of you, but I don't think people CHOOSE to be transsexual. Cross dressers are often heterosexual men who like women's clothing. A choice? Probably not, if you think about it. A choice to ACT on it, yes.



What? Bisexuality is an UNCHOSEN sexuality. It just "happens."

You are making a common mistake. "Sexuality" and "sexual behavior" are two different things. You can be gay and engage in straight sex acts, just as you can be straight and engage in gay sex acts.



Since marriage should be a contract between TWO people for the purposes of making things easy for the government benefits that go along with marriage, then no, they should pick one. If they want to be "spiritually" married/committed, etc. to three or five people, that is a different story.



How is BDSM not a fetish? It's like the poster child for fetishes.

In response to this.. if your telling me the same bible bashing idiots and the feminist are some how supportive of the lifesytle.. as in master/slave not just the sex part of it then clearly you must think we have some open minded people. Bdsm is bondage displine sado mashocism.. while many things are a part of that term fetish just happen to fall into them but in no way does it define relationships.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:58 PM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,634,639 times
Reputation: 2893
Look, I don't care what people do in the privacy of their own homes/hotels. I just don't want to see it. I don't care if its two straight, two gay, or god help me a man and his plushie -- I do not want to see it.

Now, a couple that needs a riding crop and rubber headwear to get it on is a lot different then a gay couple that want to get married. I mean - one can keep the fetish gear in thier home and hell, set up a blog to talk about it if they wanted to. To be gay is the same as being straight - it is what it is, and it's not necessarily about sex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 03:03 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,314,292 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by camping! View Post
Look, I don't care what people do in the privacy of their own homes/hotels. I just don't want to see it. I don't care if its two straight, two gay, or god help me a man and his plushie -- I do not want to see it.

Now, a couple that needs a riding crop and rubber headwear to get it on is a lot different then a gay couple that want to get married. I mean - one can keep the fetish gear in thier home and hell, set up a blog to talk about it if they wanted to. To be gay is the same as being straight - it is what it is, and it's not necessarily about sex.
Should one always be required to wear a big white wedding dress to make gay marriage legal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 03:05 PM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,634,639 times
Reputation: 2893
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Should one always be required to wear a big white wedding dress to make gay marriage legal?
What?
Do you mean that in order to be married part of the couple must look like a meringue? Or that it should be socially acceptable to wear the honeymoon special done the aisle?

Seriously not getting what you are asking......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,165 posts, read 19,174,827 times
Reputation: 14874
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellalunatic View Post
Really? Where? I can think of more than a handful that have been up and running for at least a decade or so...

it's not the BDSM that's 'illegal', but the business transaction ($$$ for services, and no it's not sex) that is. FYI. (at least not here in CA.)
Southwestern Manhattan is full of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 06:43 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,314,292 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by camping! View Post
What?
Do you mean that in order to be married part of the couple must look like a meringue? Or that it should be socially acceptable to wear the honeymoon special done the aisle?

Seriously not getting what you are asking......
It's the word. "Marriage" has a religious root and tradition as it's definition.

The definition does not fit same sex relationships, or the identities of the oh-so conjoined.

So, if it is make-believe-copy, then shouldn't there be a wedding dress?

For it to be a marriage, wouldn't there have to be a Mr. and Mrs.?

Mz., Mzr.?

I see "gay marriage" as an invasive term.

"Gay marriage" is language trespass, and tradition trespass.

Let's call hydrogen and oxygen water, and carbon and oxygen something else. Though both are bonded in "love", they are still different.

Join a union, but don't insist that by doing so you have somehow become "management".

I see nothing wrong with a wealthy man leaving his estate to his dog with specifications on it's care and upkeep, but I object to the relationship being legally classified as a dog-man marriage. So I would ask the same question, "which one wears the wedding dress"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top