Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I thought this writer really pegged Obama. I do not agree with the entire article, as Clinton was a good president and nothing like Obama. The writer's attacks on Clinton show he is partisan. The writer's opinion on Obama, however, seems spot on.
Clinton's first two years of his presidency were very partisan, and disasterous. He then moved closer to the center, and had much more success with that tactic.
That article is typical partisan-hack BS.. So apparently the only narcissists to occupy the White House in the last 50 years were Democrats...(Please go listen to some of the Nixon tapes and tell me if you hear any "narcissistic rage")
Look there is plenty to criticize the current administration over; intelligent disussion of the issues is one thing..but silly articles like the one linked to aren't convincing to anyone except for the Fox News crowd.
What part of Fox News is that source? I guess there must be some kind of a conspiracy afoot here.
Could you point out some of the falsehoods the writer seemed to think he sees at the White House. Your post says nothing but that it is all lies and that the guy is a hack. I would really appreciate your telling me about all the outright lies you found. I think I have seen about everything he said. Help me understand, please.
Read it. Twice. So you're comfortable having some partisan hack diagnose the President?
Geez, I dunno, but if I were busy trying to do my job and there were people around me constantly undermining my efforts, lying about me and spreading toxic sewage about every tiny aspect of everything I do, I'd be angry too. What normal human wouldn't be?
Why don't YOU read it again. Read the parts he's supposedly enraged about. His anger, if it really exists, is COMPLETELY justified.
Why don't you list those parts for me instead of having me go back and read the whole article. I found so little that I couldn't agree with that I thought that even left leaning victims would not be able to do anything but what you have done, and that is to talk about how bad that was without listing one thing that you can prove to be wrong. How does it feel to be left leaning and unable to talk about what is wrong, just that it is without discussing the wrong things?
There is no truth that comes out of American Thinker, just your run of the mill right wingnut website.
No truth but which of the man's points aren't truth? You have done the very thing that your kind of folks do so well. Did you say that nothing but lies come from American Thinker? Make up a list of the lies you saw and get them to me so I know which statements were just bald faced lies.
Well I DID read the entire article and I agree with the two posters who said it's BS. As usual with 'articles' you pull from American Thinker, it's an opinion piece and as such is one man's opinion. And sorry, but the description he gives of a narcissist sounded more like GWB than Obama.
You are only 50% right here in that there are two of us that think just like that man does, with me in there. Actually Sunkl thinks that way so that makes you only 1/3 right.
I always get the feeling that they treat this just as the do a football game. Cheerleading for a team regardless of how bad or how many team members are on steroids. Blind devotion. No critical thinking. Facts do not matter and a party's stance is of no signifigance. They get their talking points du jour from the psycho talkers such as Lim-bore, Frau Pallin, Michelle "Crazy Eyes" Malkin, Sean Insanity and Glen "Jim Jones" Beck. There are others, but we all know who they are.
Do I have your permission to watch Glenn Beck today. He will be on in just over 30 minutes and I will be right there, whether you like it or not.
I think you have made an excellent point. Just as when I boldly predict that my beloved Cubbies will "do it next year" when I know full well that I will not live to see that day, they prattle their silly, goofy, babble...surely knowing full well that it makes them look ridiculous and prevents anything they say from being taken seriously.
Are you talking about the good guys and their prattle or are you talking about your left leaning friends?
If you search my previous threads and posts, it is clear that I do not support an issue because of a particular party. I have praised Obama when I thought it was deserved just as I have criticized him. I have always been open about my feelings about Clinton and my disappointment in his NAFTA agreements. If a person does not vote or form an opinion on a reprentative's voting record, they are not prepared to praise or criticize them. Many on this thread, right wing in particular, do not really care what the representative's or candidate's stance is, as long as they have an "R" on their jersey, they are acceptable and their views, no matter how reprehensible, are cheered.
How about Scozzafava? She had an R on her jersey and I have been after her for some time. Of course, I think her R stood for RINO.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
