Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-17-2009, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,863,405 times
Reputation: 4585

Advertisements

It must be too simple for some people to understand. If you received too much, you must pay it back. How it can be made any simpler, I am at a loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-17-2009, 12:27 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,850,172 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagran View Post
What's the problem for that handful of people? Their taxes don't change, they just won't have enough withheld to cover their taxes and they have to pay a little in. Maximum is $400 (S) or $800 (MFJ) and very few of that handful of people will owe that much. There's no penalty, no interest involved unless they file late.

Mistakes happen, this one really does hurts very, very few people -- if anyone. Get over it.
Wow thought democrats were for the working class people.

I am sure those that are going to not get a refund but instead owe will be pleased to get over it. To heck with the few that will have to pay. But Hey I'm for the working class people =)

Now keep telling us how democrats are for the working class while I laugh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,292,958 times
Reputation: 11416
Hey, how come I didn't see any money?

I do remember being taxed on the Bush rebates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,427,704 times
Reputation: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadex View Post
Wow thought democrats were for the working class people.

I am sure those that are going to not get a refund but instead owe will be pleased to get over it. To heck with the few that will have to pay. But Hey I'm for the working class people =)

Now keep telling us how democrats are for the working class while I laugh
I very much doubt that anyone expecting a refund won't be getting one. Anyone who this might effect is likely someone who isn't sure from year to year whether s/he will owe or have to pay a few bucks in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,427,704 times
Reputation: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
It must be too simple for some people to understand. If you received too much, you must pay it back. How it can be made any simpler, I am at a loss.
But you're wrong. That's not what happened. What happened is that some people had the amount of withholding reduced from two paychecks, resulting in the possibility that not enough was withheld to cover the taxes on combined income if they didn't fill out their W-4 correctly to compensate for being bumped into a higher tax bracket by the two incomes. If not enough was withheld to cover their taxes, they have to pay what they owe.

Last edited by Sagran; 11-17-2009 at 01:21 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 01:29 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by theolsarge View Post
Seems the IRS wasn't clear with their rules. Imagine that.
<Sagran>'s post immediately above is entirely correct, and the IRS was perfectly clear with their rules. The nature and proper treatment of Make Work Pay was on their website well before the withholding changes went into effect. If you somehow weren't aware of what was going on, that would be something to go look in the mirror about, as it would have been some sort of shortcoming on your part in terms of Accountability® and Personal Responsibility®...

Last edited by saganista; 11-17-2009 at 02:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 01:31 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,850,172 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Hey, how come I didn't see any money?

I do remember being taxed on the Bush rebates.
1st time yes last time no
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 01:35 PM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,767,070 times
Reputation: 15667
Too bad for the people who used that money for cash for clunkers or to be added for a home with a tax credit and later find out they won't qualify and have to pay the tax credit back....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 01:36 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Even if the IRS "rules" were screwed up, there was no option to decline fewer taxes being taking out short of changing your W-4. Therefore, IRS should be forced to reconcile this error out of their own budget, not out of the pocketbooks of the people.
Laughable. That's like saying that since there is no option to keep your car from running out of gas short of stopping at a gas station, the manufacturer should pay to bring you more gas. Making sure that your tank doesn't reach Empty is YOUR responsibility. So is your W-4...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,427,704 times
Reputation: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Laughable. That's like saying that since there is no option to keep your car from running out of gas short of stopping at a gas station, the manufacturer should pay to bring you more gas. Making sure that your tank doesn't reach Empty is YOUR responsibility. So is your W-4...
But....but.....but it's so hard to change my W-4.

If I'm one of those people who filled out his W-4's originally so that I'm on the edge every year and might have to pay in if that $400 wasn't withheld, I reap what I sow when I cut it that close.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top