Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The theatre of the absurd has found a new headlining act in Comer v. Murphy Oil USA. Essentially, landowners in Mississippi are suing oil and coal companies for rising sea levels and increased hurricane strength, claiming that the greenhouse gases they release is the cause.
The Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans recently overturned a lower court’s ruling and will allow the plaintiffs their day in court. J. Russell Jackson, an expert on mass tort litigation, commented that, “Comer is a private class action for compensatory and punitive damages, not a suit brought by states or municipalities for injunctive relief. And that means contingency fees. And thus the promise of copycat lawsuits.”
While the Court ruled that the plaintiffs only had standing to assert their claims for public and private nuisance, trespass and negligence, it has opened the door for a flood of activist lawsuits by environmental groups. Journalist Kirsten Korosec speculates how far this ruling could go by asking if it would be possible to sue an automaker for making mostly SUVs.
According to Jackson, the Katrina case is at an early stage, and the Fifth Circuit’s ruling “does not mean there is enough causation evidence to survive a motion to dismiss.” Hopefully, that is exactly what will happen.
For more information, visit The Pelican Institute for Public Policy.
The theatre of the absurd has found a new headlining act in Comer v. Murphy Oil USA. Essentially, landowners in Mississippi are suing oil and coal companies for rising sea levels and increased hurricane strength, claiming that the greenhouse gases they release is the cause.
The Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans recently overturned a lower court’s ruling and will allow the plaintiffs their day in court. J. Russell Jackson, an expert on mass tort litigation, commented that, “Comer is a private class action for compensatory and punitive damages, not a suit brought by states or municipalities for injunctive relief. And that means contingency fees. And thus the promise of copycat lawsuits.”
While the Court ruled that the plaintiffs only had standing to assert their claims for public and private nuisance, trespass and negligence, it has opened the door for a flood of activist lawsuits by environmental groups. Journalist Kirsten Korosec speculates how far this ruling could go by asking if it would be possible to sue an automaker for making mostly SUVs.
According to Jackson, the Katrina case is at an early stage, and the Fifth Circuit’s ruling “does not mean there is enough causation evidence to survive a motion to dismiss.” Hopefully, that is exactly what will happen.
For more information, visit The Pelican Institute for Public Policy.
Didn't they get the emails? It's all a fraud.....case closed.
The theatre of the absurd has found a new headlining act in Comer v. Murphy Oil USA. Essentially, landowners in Mississippi are suing oil and coal companies for rising sea levels and increased hurricane strength, claiming that the greenhouse gases they release is the cause.
Do the people bringing the suit drive cars? Use electricity? They could be tried as co-defendents if so....
Most of the links will allow you to read the actual complaint in the case as well. It can also be found on the 5th Circuits website. (Docket #07-60756)
It's also a shake-down mentality. The eco-facists are greasing their legal guns, it's going to be messy.
The big question is can the defendants sue for legal costs when the nut-cases loose.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.