Republican lawmaker warns that same-sex marriage will lead to teaching kids about anal sex and "excrement" (legal, school)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Same-sex marriage has been legal in New Hampshire for a few weeks, but at least one Republican state representative is already trying to repeal it by using the following as part of her argument:
"We're talking about taking the penis of one man and putting it in the rectum of another man and wriggling it around in excrement," said State Representative Nancy Elliott (R-Merrimack) at a recent executive session. "And you have to think, would I allow that to be done to me?"
Republican lawmaker warns that same-sex marriage will lead to teaching kids about anal sex and "excrement"
Wouldnt that technically be true? If you are going to teach chidlren sex education in school, and then accept gay marriage, which of course means gay sex is taking place, then indeed you need to discuss the various forms of gay sex in the process..
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale
Same-sex marriage has been legal in New Hampshire for a few weeks, but at least one Republican lawmaker is already trying to repeal it by using crude language
"We're talking about taking the penis of a man and putting it in the rectum of another man and wriggling it around in excrement," said Nancy Elliott at a recent executive session. "And you have to think, would I want that to be done to me?"
Is discussing anal sex crude? If its taking place, (and we all know it is), and if you want to teach sex education in school, then indeed the result is discussing anal sex. Its not "crude" to discuss the fact that its being discussed in school.
After all, if you can discuss with a 5th grader anal sex by using terminology like "penis", and "rectum", then why is it crude for an adult to use such language?
I know a lot of straight folk, myself included, who have wriggled around in excrement and enjoyed it. I guess I deserve to be arrested for my unnatural behavior.
I know a lot of straight folk, myself included, who have wriggled around in excrement and enjoyed it. I guess I deserve to be arrested for my unnatural behavior.
Now you are being abserd.. The Republican lawmaker said nothing about arresting individuals for taking part in sex, (or gay sex for that matter)..
She discussed the consequences of gay marriage and the result of teaching gay sex in school, which is indeed a valid question many ask of straight sex as well as those who oppose gay sex.
Wouldnt that technically be true? If you are going to teach chidlren sex education in school, and then accept gay marriage, which of course means gay sex is taking place, then indeed you need to discuss the various forms of gay sex in the process..
You seriously believe that? Are kids taught about heterosexual sexual acts since opposite-sex marriage is legal everywhere?
Quote:
Its not "crude" to discuss the fact that its being discussed in school.
But the fact is that it's not being taught, which is why that woman looked ridiculous. And yes, considering the setting she was in, I would say her language was crude and inappropriate. You'll notice in the video that the person conducting the meeting told her that she needed to focus on the issue at hand.
It's strange to me that some people hear the words "same-sex marriage" and immediately start to think of two men having anal sex together.
Wouldnt that technically be true? If you are going to teach chidlren sex education in school, and then accept gay marriage, which of course means gay sex is taking place, then indeed you need to discuss the various forms of gay sex in the process..
Is discussing anal sex crude? If its taking place, (and we all know it is), and if you want to teach sex education in school, then indeed the result is discussing anal sex. Its not "crude" to discuss the fact that its being discussed in school.
After all, if you can discuss with a 5th grader anal sex by using terminology like "penis", and "rectum", then why is it crude for an adult to use such language?
Have you never watched a porn? This kind of sex is not only "gay sex".
You act like only gay men do it.
Also, not all gay men perform anal sex, so why is there a need to illustrate that to 5th graders?
Do teachers talk about all the sex practices that happen between a man and a woman like SM, roleplay etc? No.
Now you are being abserd.. The Republican lawmaker said nothing about arresting individuals for taking part in sex, (or gay sex for that matter)..
She discussed the consequences of gay marriage and the result of teaching gay sex in school, which is indeed a valid question many ask of straight sex as well as those who oppose gay sex.
Seems more like she looks back at a time that had, and enforced, sodomy laws. If her purpose was to discuss limitations on sex ed then there was no need for the histrionics. I don't care what she does in her bedroom, why does she care what I do in mine?
You seriously believe that? Are kids taught about heterosexual sexual acts since opposite-sex marriage is legal everywhere?
Um.. yes, yes they are.. Kids are indeed taught heterosexual sexual acts going back 20+ years in school..
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale
But the fact is that it's not being taught, which is why that women looked ridiculous.
Where do you live that sex education isnt part of the class subject? In New Hampshire its not a state required class, but indeed its a class required of many local school..
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale
And yes, considering the setting she was in, her language was crude and inappropriate. You'll notice in the video that the person conducting the meeting told her that she needed to focus on the issue at hand.
The issue at hand was the repealing of same sex marriage, which indeed would include the consequences of marriage. (which includes changing class classes to included gay sex).
Are you claiming the lady was lying when she was contacted from a teacher telling her they began teaching "gay sex"? If its going to be socially acceptable that gays have sex, then indeed teaching it in sex class is appropriate, including the language which would come from such things..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
