Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Phil Jones admits:
- Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' is missing
- There has been no global warming since 1995
- Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
Van Jones admits:
- Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' is missing
- There has been no global warming since 1995
- Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
Franz Josef Glacier in NZ is growing. It well documented that glaciers are indeed growing all over the world. What you do son is cherry pick your data: Glaciers Are Growing All Over The World
Van Jones admits:
- Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' is missing
- There has been no global warming since 1995
- Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
Van Jones admits:
- Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' is missing
- There has been no global warming since 1995
- Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
Also, he admitted he was disorganized -- he didnt "make a U-turn" by any means.
According to Mr Harrabin, colleagues of Professor Jones said ‘his office is piled high with paper, fragments from over the years, tens of thousands of pieces of paper, and they suspect what happened was he took in the raw data to a central database and then let the pieces of paper go because he never realised that 20 years later he would be held to account over them’.
***
...he denied he had cheated over the data or unfairly influenced the scientific process, and said he still believed recent temperature rises were predominantly man-made.
This includes the scandal of that "independent" panel that will investigate CRU - one "believer" has already stepped down and another is on his way out.
Just shows you how much they need to pad the panel to whitewash the whole affair.
Also, he admitted he was disorganized -- he didnt "make a U-turn" by any means.
According to Mr Harrabin, colleagues of Professor Jones said ‘his office is piled high with paper, fragments from over the years, tens of thousands of pieces of paper, and they suspect what happened was he took in the raw data to a central database and then let the pieces of paper go because he never realised that 20 years later he would be held to account over them’.
***
...he denied he had cheated over the data or unfairly influenced the scientific process, and said he still believed recent temperature rises were predominantly man-made.
but....
Quote:
He further admitted that in the last 15 years there had been no ‘statistically significant’ warming, although he argued this was a blip rather than the long-term trend.
Why isn't 15 years ‘statistically significant’ when just 10 years ago every year was ‘statistically significant’?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
cherry-picking your data set
