Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,112 posts, read 30,700,125 times
Reputation: 16397

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by amerifree View Post
They are already have a place...it's called the privacy of their home.
So they shouldn't be able to hold hands in public?
A peck on the cheek before going back to their jobs after lunch?
Attend functions as a couple?

In that case, I would like to see zero touching at all between heterosexual couples and that includes holding hands and hugging. After all, they can do that in the privacy of their own homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:40 AM
 
10,719 posts, read 20,355,875 times
Reputation: 10021
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
You are no different that the people you call the American taliban. You and they are trying to impose your morality. You think by calling Christians the American taliban, that some how marginalizes them.The fact you choose to do that makes your morality no better.
One side chooses faith as morality and your side uses no faith as morality. Both sides are trying to impose their standards of morality. So when you call one side the American taliban for trying to impose their morality you are not doing anything different when you try to impose your morality. Name calling just shows the desperation you will go to impose yours.
I am different because I would not deny attendance to Christian Evangelicals at a prom. I don't agree with the fundamentalist Christian Evangelical views but I'm not going to deny attendance to an Evangelical because I disagree with their views. On the other hand, Evangelicals are denying someone admission to a prom because they disagree with their personal views. This is why you are the Christian version of the Taliban. If I was acting like you guys, I wouldn't allow you and other Evangelicals to attend prom because then I would be imposing my morality on you. Christian Evangelicals are not the only group whose beliefs oppose homosexuality. However, these other anti-homosexuality groups are not functioning like a Taliban like Evangelicals because they are not imposing their anti-homosexuality beliefs on the public.

Last edited by azriverfan.; 03-12-2010 at 11:59 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,249,965 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD View Post
And they did that because...?
Becasue the school has a right to endorse or not endorse a prom.Ther eis nothing stopping them from putting on a prom for their kids
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,062,964 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Becasue the school has a right to endorse or not endorse a prom.Ther eis nothing stopping them from putting on a prom for their kids

You're absolutely correct.

It's still disgusting that they would cancel a prom because they got sued because they discriminated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:54 AM
JPD
 
12,138 posts, read 18,346,473 times
Reputation: 8005
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Becasue the school has a right to endorse or not endorse a prom.Ther eis nothing stopping them from putting on a prom for their kids

That doesn't answer the question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:57 AM
JPD
 
12,138 posts, read 18,346,473 times
Reputation: 8005
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
If you say it is OK to have this gay couple at the prom you are laying a moral ground that you stand for.

If you say you do not want this couple at the prom then you lay a morale groundwork.
Which one of those statements do think has more in common with the rights granted in the US Constitution?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,062,964 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
I think that both girls could have found male dates, and then switched partners at the prom (if there's two gay girls, must be at least two gay guys in their class too).

Instead of making a big deal out of it getting the news involved.

Just more pro-homo-propaganda going around because of it.

You'd be right, if she wasn't told that she would be kicked out if she was found with her partner at the prom.

Even if she went with a male date.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,249,965 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by azriverfan. View Post
I am different because I would not deny attendance to Christian Evangelicals at a prom. I don't agree with the fundamentalist Christian Evangelical views but I'm not going to deny attendance to an Evangelical because I disagree with their views. On the other hand, Evangelicals are denying someone admission to a prom because they disagree with their personal views. This is why you are the Christian version of the Taliban. If I was acting like you guys, I wouldn't allow you and other Evangelicals to attend prom because then I would be imposing my morality on you. Christian Evangelicals are not the only group whose beliefs oppose homosexuality. However, they are not functioning like a Taliban like you guys because they aren't imposing their anti-homosexuality beliefs on the public.
The prom is canceled for all not for one group.
They being all the kids and parents can get together rand have any type of prom they want. everyone is being denied admission to the school sponsored prom their is not one.

would you deny a group of KKK members wearing their hoods entrance to a prom.
The continued hate torwards Christians as in Christians are blame for everything, Christians are not lopping people heads off on video.Christians are not training their young to strap bombs on themselves and kill others. Yet the continue date for someone because they live by a standard that they have every right to live by is ludicrous.This is America , if you want to be Christian and practice your religion it so your right to do so
If you a Mormon and want to practice and live by your religious standards you should be free to without being harassed by atheist
I do not see atheists going after Muslims with the hate i see for Christians.
The school did what it had a right to do cancel it, the kids and parents can have their own prom set how they want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,249,965 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD View Post
Which one of those statements do think has more in common with the rights granted in the US Constitution?
both do the constitution gives you the right to make either choice
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Geneva, IL
12,979 posts, read 14,605,930 times
Reputation: 14863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Houston3 View Post
They must have signs on the streets that say "No Gays Allowed" or how would you even know that???????
Seriously? Unless you live in a bubble, a cave, or under a rock, of course you know what peoples opinions are about social issues where you live. Whether or not certain parts of the country are more bigoted, or whether people in those areas are more inclined to voice their bigoted opinions is unclear, but people certainly like to voice their homophobic slurs where I live. I also have kids who come home and ask about things they have heard from other kids in school, such as "Are Aunt Barbara and Aunt Vickie (who have been together 36 years) bad people. Will says they are going to hell."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nujabes View Post
Maybe because a high number of people in the area express hostile attitudes towards gays?

If you live in an area for any lengthy period of time and require street signs to figure out the political inclinations and biases of the people around you, you probably can't read a street sign anyways.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top