Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-08-2010, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,833,891 times
Reputation: 12341

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Have you looked at the EITC and how it effects the calculation? I know a fellow engineer with a middle class income, modest mortgage deduction and 2 kids got more back than he put in.
As appropriately addressed by weekender, and stated that your engineer friend is either grossly underpaid or has a creative accountant. Regardless of that, however, does he not pay payroll taxes either?

As of 2005 (according to Tax Policy Center), households making less than $40K still paid at an average rate of about 14% of its income on federal taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,532,311 times
Reputation: 25777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weekender1968 View Post
As an Engineer, I would expect your friend is very underpaid or has a very creative accountant

Well, he is here in Idaho, and pay scales are low. I'd guess mid $60s at the time, perhaps $10k of mortgage interest, $2k property tax deduction and $3k state income tax. All rough guesses, and I should break out the documentation and do the math myself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:02 PM
 
15,096 posts, read 8,643,669 times
Reputation: 7447
Quote:
Originally Posted by MainelyJersey View Post
How many jobs do those Fortune 500 and Investment banks create?

Now how many do the lower 47% create?
LOVE THAT SLAVE MENTALITY !!!

Boy ... if I didn't own all of these here plantations ... well you wouldn't have any cotton to pick ... then what would you do?

Uhhh ... well Boss ... maybe I wouldn't be a slave?

Shut up and get back to work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,532,311 times
Reputation: 25777
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
As appropriately addressed by weekender, and stated that your engineer friend is either grossly underpaid or has a creative accountant. Regardless of that, however, does he not pay payroll taxes either?

As of 2005 (according to Tax Policy Center), households making less than $40K still paid at an average rate of about 14% of its income on federal taxes.
I thought this thread was about income tax, and specifically federal income tax, did I miss something?

If you factor in all taxes, 14% seems low, even for lower incomes, when you factor in SS/FICA, state income and property taxes, sales tax and all the taxes on products you purchase that have been taxed throughout the production cycle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,403,011 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Well, he is here in Idaho, and pay scales are low. I'd guess mid $60s at the time, perhaps $10k of mortgage interest, $2k property tax deduction and $3k state income tax. All rough guesses, and I should break out the documentation and do the math myself.
60K a year is still waaaaaayyyyyy over the EITC limit.

I don't think I've gotten that since I made more than 40K a year, and then it was only a hundred bucks or so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:09 PM
 
15,096 posts, read 8,643,669 times
Reputation: 7447
I think we need an "American Public Tipping Party" ... all those that fall over, lose their right to vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,403,011 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
I thought this thread was about income tax, and specifically federal income tax, did I miss something?

If you factor in all taxes, 14% seems low, even for lower incomes, when you factor in SS/FICA, state income and property taxes, sales tax and all the taxes on products you purchase that have been taxed throughout the production cycle.
Agreed,

If we are to raise the limit on SS contributions, then we'll have to raise the limits on pay outs, or thats not fair.

Personally, I don't feel like giving Bill Gates 40 million a year in SSI benefits, when he turns 67.

Social security will be just fine, if its taken away from the general fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:15 PM
 
15,096 posts, read 8,643,669 times
Reputation: 7447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
I thought this thread was about income tax, and specifically federal income tax, did I miss something?

If you factor in all taxes, 14% seems low, even for lower incomes, when you factor in SS/FICA, state income and property taxes, sales tax and all the taxes on products you purchase that have been taxed throughout the production cycle.
No you aren't missing anything ... the others that believe this BS are missing the point of it ... for those not filing a return ... just file and you'll get ALL YOUR MONEY BACK .... wink, wink, nod, nod.

Pay no attention to that missing $300 out of your paycheck this week ... you really aren't paying any taxes.

I like the other comment ... "I need a new household". That is probably the most lucid response so far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:20 PM
 
Location: KCMO Metro Area
199 posts, read 319,615 times
Reputation: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Agreed,

If we are to raise the limit on SS contributions, then we'll have to raise the limits on pay outs, or thats not fair.

Personally, I don't feel like giving Bill Gates 40 million a year in SSI benefits, when he turns 67.

Social security will be just fine, if its taken away from the general fund.
Well, it would take some MAJOR changes to the laws of social security that are not likely to happen, but I remember one of those government "think tank studies" that was done back in the early 90's; and it suggested just this. It didn't call for a removal of the cap completely, but it basically said to raise the cap a certain percentage and keep the benefit percent at current levels of percentage, and it would make Social Security "secure".

The same study also noted that a temporary increase in overall income tax rates could achieve the same thing and would easier to accomplish, "politically".
Either way it is going to take a tax of one kind or another to bring the funding back into proper alignment and the politicians have got to stop raiding the fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,403,011 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weekender1968 View Post
Well, it would take some MAJOR changes to the laws of social security that are not likely to happen, but I remember one of those government "think tank studies" that was done back in the early 90's; and it suggested just this. It didn't call for a removal of the cap completely, but it basically said to raise the cap a certain percentage and keep the benefit percent at current levels of percentage, and it would make Social Security "secure".

The same study also noted that a temporary increase in overall income tax rates could achieve the same thing and would easier to accomplish, "politically".
Either way it is going to take a tax of one kind or another to bring the funding back into proper alignment and the politicians have got to stop raiding the fund.
To me, asking someone to pay into social security more, and receive no increase for that, is the very definition of wealth distribution.

I'll complain that the richest Americans pay a lower income tax rate, than me, thats true, and it needs to be fixed. However, I don't want them to have to pay higher taxes than me. More money yes, they have more money, so their tax rate entitles them to pay in more, but not a higher tax rate itself.

I think every American should pay a 20% flat tax. No more sales tax, no more gas tax, no more "progressive tax brackets", no more SSI tax, no more medicare tax, just one, flat tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top