Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:31 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,137,035 times
Reputation: 8527

Advertisements

Rand Paul's defense of BP is raising eyebrows, much like his stance on civil rights and private business. His statement that "sometimes accidents just happen" simplifies a larger problem with giving big oil a pass in regulations and safety precautions.

Maybe he shoudl explain his "Accidents happen" theory to the people in LA and FL, who will be cleaning up this mess for decades.

washingtonpost.com (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/21/AR2010052101452.html - broken link)

Rand Paul: Obama's criticism of BP 'un-American'

WASHINGTON -- Taking another unconventional stand, Kentucky's Republican Senate nominee Rand Paul criticized President Barack Obama's handling of the Gulf oil spill Friday as putting "his boot heel on the throat of BP" and "really un-American."

Paul's defense of the oil company came during an interview as he tried to explain his controversial take on civil rights law, an issue that has overtaken his campaign since his victory in Tuesday's GOP primary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,444,292 times
Reputation: 1895
What a nut. Like his father he longs for the "good" old days of plantations and slavery..

Looks like the "honest" Paul is now changing his tune being in full scale damage control mode:

Quote:
"Paul told CNN he would have voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act, a statement he declined to make one day earlier" on MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Show. Maddow asked: "Do you think that a private business has the right to say we don't serve black people?" Paul answered: "Yes..
GOP watch: Rand Paul walks it back - First Read - msnbc.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:41 AM
 
45,261 posts, read 26,514,970 times
Reputation: 25016
I don't take his criticism of Obama's us vs. them, pot stirring lawyer mentality as a defense of BP.

Nowhere in the article does Paul absolve BP of responsibility.
Quote:
On the oil spill, Paul, a libertarian and tea party favorite, said he had heard nothing from BP indicating it wouldn't pay for the spill that threatens devastating environmental damage along the Gulf of Mexico coast.
"And I think it's part of this sort of blame-game society in the sense that it's always got to be somebody's fault instead of the fact that maybe sometimes accidents happen," Paul said.

Last edited by Frank DeForrest; 05-21-2010 at 09:50 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,251,763 times
Reputation: 7373
I wonder how Paul feels about the federal involvement in food safety inspections...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:44 AM
 
683 posts, read 429,622 times
Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
What a nut. Like his father he longs for the "good" old days of plantations and slavery..

Looks like the "honest" Paul is now changing his tune being in full scale damage control mode:

GOP watch: Rand Paul walks it back - First Read - msnbc.com
Attention liberals, we know you hate Ron Paul and we knew you would hate Rand Paul because they stand for the same things. There's no need to waste tons of your time throwing our race cards 24/7. We know you think he's a racist and we know you're wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:44 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,204,958 times
Reputation: 9383
Looks like the left wing has found their next punching bag.. This is the 3rd thread on the man today.. It must mean he's making progress..
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
His statement that "sometimes accidents just happen"
What part of the statement is false?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:47 AM
 
683 posts, read 429,622 times
Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Looks like the left wing has found their next punching bag.. This is the 3rd thread on the man today.. It must mean he's making progress..

What part of the statement is false?
Making progress he is. Didn't you know, accidents are racist?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:47 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,204,958 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
What a nut. Like his father he longs for the "good" old days of plantations and slavery.
Dont you ever get tired of being so honest about your lies? Lookup the rights of individuals to own property THEY PAID FOR.. And then talk to me about the "good old days"..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:50 AM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,707,622 times
Reputation: 7943
I saw his father a few years ago on C-SPAN. He was asked about the Chinese toys that were discovered to have contained lead. The woman asked him if he believed the U.S. needed to regulate importation of toys from China because of this problem, and Paul said no. When asked about the children in the U.S. who would surely die if the toys weren't inspected, he said, "Well, sometimes that's the price we have to pay to live in a truly free society".

Libertarianism. It sounds nice in principle, but a purely libertarian society would be a disaster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:55 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,204,958 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
I saw his father a few years ago on C-SPAN. He was asked about the Chinese toys that were discovered to have contained lead. The woman asked him if he believed the U.S. needed to regulate importation of toys from China because of this problem, and Paul said no. When asked about the children in the U.S. who would surely die if the toys weren't inspected, he said, "Well, sometimes that's the price we have to pay to live in a truly free society".

Libertarianism. It sounds nice in principle, but a purely libertarian society would be a disaster.
You are assuming individuals would buy toys with led based paint if the government didnt ban it.. I for one wouldnt, but if you would, then that says more about yourself than anything I could ever post..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top