Quote:
I was actually talking about her, not him when it comes to the clicks, not ticks. Also it took 8 years to destroy a country. Why would you think that it would take less than 2 to dig us out of this tremendous hole?
|
Sorry, your post wasn't very clear. You jumped around so much. My mistake. As far as 8 years to destroy a country, For the majority of the 8 years the unemployment rate was under 5%. It went up the last year or two (to 7.2% when Bush left office) after the mortgage collapse (caused in large part by Barny Frank's friends Freddie and Fannie aka greedy people were protected by Democrats at the expense of Americans) and Wall Street's collapse (caused by greedy people protected by Republicans at the expense of Americans). None of this has to do with the majority of any of the points I listed. If you want to talk about Bush, start a different thread. Don't try to change the topic.
Quote:
I read the LOADED thread title. I do agree that he should be doing a hell of alot more but usually these threads are started by people that thought Bush was a good or decent president-
|
If you go back and read a lot of my previous posts, you'll see I am in no way a Bush supporter and have said that Bush and Obama are both big spenders who pay too much attention to lobbiests and special interests rather than doing what the majority of the people who elected them want. Example: the majority were against government paid for prescription drugs, for securing the border after 9-11, and against government run health care, and running up huge debt. I hope this puts to rest the people who keep saying this is started by an Obama hater who loved Bush. I respect both in that they both accomplished a lot before they took office, but like all polititions, they were corrupted by power.
Can you tell me why any of the points I brought up in the original post are wrong? I do have one to add. Obama promised to close Guantanamo within one year of taking office.