Rep. Sestak Confirms the White House Offered him a job in administration (enemies, paycheck)

[HistorianDude]

So... it turns out that no "bribe" was offered at all. The "job" didn't even come with a paycheck.

Nothin' to see here, folks. Move along.

[the mean fish]

Originally Posted by padcrasher

It's nowhere in the ball park of "election fraud"....LOL

Give us a name of a person who is alleging election fraud?

I am, I've already said that as a US Citizen I feel that this was illegal and corrupt. It is clearly election fraud.

[padcrasher]

Originally Posted by Motion

Then why didn't Rahm Emanual just offer the position to Sestak?

Why isn't Rahm Emanual everywhere at anytime?

That's what I'd like to know!.............LOL

[roysoldboy]

Originally Posted by padcrasher

The NYT reports today Bill Clinton on behalf of the Obama Admin approached Sestak about a non-paying, prominent advisory position to the President that would allow Sestak to remain in the House.

So not only was the offer not illegal, it was also fully ethical there being no money involved.

Wingers, I'd go on to some other "outrage of the day" material.....You're not going to get much mileage out of this......LOL

Ah, yes but the final answer comes on Fox in about 10 minutes so I will wait to see what Sestak said and what that White House said. According to my girl, Megyn Kelly, there is not agreement.

Megyn is saying just this minute that the White House went through Emanuel to Clinton to Sestak that they would give him a Senior White House advisory board that was unpaid. Sestak only says that he said no so we are still outside looking in, I think.

[padcrasher]

Originally Posted by the mean fish

I am, I've already said that as a US Citizen I feel that this was illegal and corrupt. It is clearly election fraud.

Nope. You're a sore loser who has no first hand knowledge of what happened other than what you have read. That doesn't cut it.

[murfles]

Originally Posted by padcrasher

Nope. You're a sore loser who has no first hand knowledge of what happened other than what you have read. That doesn't cut it.

And neither do you. You only know what lies you read also.

[the mean fish]

Originally Posted by padcrasher

Nope. You're a sore loser who has no first hand knowledge of what happened other than what you have read. That doesn't cut it.

Based on what the parties involved have said publicly I know enough to be very concerned, this has nothing to do with being a sore loser just like Bill Clinton's impeachment had nothing to do with oral sex. This is about honesty, lies, corruption and all of those little things that Democrats like to ignore when they are in power. I'm concerned that the well known corruption of Chicago politics has now been injected into the White House, this story just confirms what a lot of people suspected.

[padcrasher]

Originally Posted by murfles

And neither do you. You only know what lies you read also.

Exactly. So until somebody with first hand knowledge comes up with a credible allegation of a crime being committed, sore losers are SOL.....LOL

[Waianaegirl]

Originally Posted by the mean fish

Well we can't impeach that worthless piece of white trash twice, I guess we could take away his Big Macs and make him sleep with his wife for a change.

LOL!!! But if you were him, would you want to sleep with her? Of course he's not in trouble, he's one of Obama's troops, and they can do no wrong

[TRUEGRITT]

Originally Posted by padcrasher

Why would there need to be an investigation when you don't have one single person involved with this even alleging anything illegal?

This has to be one of the most moronic statements I have ever heard. If you are involved in something illegal are you going to say something illegal has been done?