Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are so confused, now you're not making any sense at all.
ALL violent crime is reprehensible, and a big problem in South Africa. ALL races are victims, take another look at the links I posted earlier. Are you saying
Quote:
I should be more concerned about the white victims?
I'm really unclear what it is you are insinuating.
No, but if they were all White victims you would not be here.
I'm not glossing over anything. Your arrogant ignorance is just ********. Would you like to go tit for tat over who lost the most family members during the war in Zimbabwe? Here's a hint, you'd lose.
Funny thing is, it was/is blacks killing blacks just like here in the USA.
You use the word slavery loosely, none of these people were held against there will and they were paid for there work. Poor working conditions and lousy pay? Probably, but they had a choice and they stayed. So, lets be careful how we use the word slavery.
please enlighten me as to how apartheid allowed this to occur?
Seemingly, other countries colonised by the whiteman did not endorse apartheid up until 1994 - and curiously they managed to be quite industrious, and advanced economically.
I'm interested, how a policy such as apartheid, which is classified as a crime against humanity, has one single advantageous element to it.
The White man invented and kept the economy going and since it's been turned over, the economy is a mess and corruption runs ramped, just like every other country in Africa that is run by blacks.
oh, ok. So then if America Blacks decided to rise up and beat white Americans to a pulp, you'd be ok with that, because, you know, white Americans deserve it and all.
Imagine that! Tribal warfare, genocide. Take a look at black run countries in Africa, they are all a mess fighting for power.
Mugabe is a megalomaniac of the worst order. Hillary Clinton has had many meetings recently with both Mugabe and Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai, but it would seem they are both hoping for the lifting of economic sanctions without implementing any real change. The hope was that Thabo Mbeki as the leader of the Southern African Development Community would take the lead in applying pressure on Mugabe, but Mbeki was a worthless President, and an even more usless presence in the SADC. Clinton has said repeatedly that her hope is for more pressure to come from governments of countries directly surrounding Zimbabwe, and their business partners, but nothing has come of it. I do think Zuma the new South African President will be a lot tougher on Mugabe, time will tell.
Exactly. I'd also love to know what people think should happen in Zimbabwe. Should the US send in the military, stage a coup, what exactly?
God forbid White people should interfere.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
