Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-17-2014, 01:04 PM
 
1,666 posts, read 1,018,050 times
Reputation: 846

Advertisements

The attitude here is crazy. Legislators have been given a budget based on current tax modes and systems and *should* figure out a way to pay for the things that are necessary to the citizens of the city without resorting to additional revenue streams. Things like funding street repairs, the police, fire department, schools, etc... should *NOT* require additional taxes, levies and fees. My God, people here are completely missing the point of this, or are inept from an education standpoint in regards to taxation and governance and therefore should not comment on the topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-17-2014, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Portland OR
2,662 posts, read 3,859,347 times
Reputation: 4881
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Streets don't repair themselves for free.
You seem to be have some sort of weird Portland luv and you are a Portland apologist/cheerleader.
In your mind, ANYTHING Portland does is great and no one can argue otherwise, lest the aura of Portland greatness that you have be tarnished.

You continue to point out that streets repair requires $. In your mind if Portland gov't says it needs the $; then it must be OK and true.

This is wildly superfluous and silly. This city taxes the populace already at a great level (above the national average). The funds have been generated for decades to take care of road maintenance. The city has chosen to misappropriate the funds.

The city MUST be challenged to change it's ways and live within the means it already has.
If that means getting out of areas it has no business being in then - so be it. From my office, I see empty buses running all day long up and down the road. Close down some of the waste!!!

If there is no BIG challenge to city forcing explanation of WHY this is needed in 2014; it just shows that the folks here are nothing but sheeple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2014, 01:20 PM
 
1,666 posts, read 1,018,050 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccjarider View Post
You seem to be have some sort of weird Portland luv and you are a Portland apologist/cheerleader.
In your mind, ANYTHING Portland does is great and no one can argue otherwise, lest the aura of Portland greatness that you have be tarnished.

You continue to point out that streets repair requires $. In your mind if Portland gov't says it needs the $; then it must be OK and true.

This is wildly superfluous and silly. This city taxes the populace already at a great level (above the national average). The funds have been generated for decades to take care of road maintenance. The city has chosen to misappropriate the funds.

The city MUST be challenged to change it's ways and live within the means it already has.
If that means getting out of areas it has no business being in then - so be it. From my office, I see empty buses running all day long up and down the road. Close down some of the waste!!!

If there is no BIG challenge to city forcing explanation of WHY this is needed in 2014; it just shows that the folks here are nothing but sheeple.
Thank you sir.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2014, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDXNative2Houston View Post
Again you prove to completely miss the point of others posts.
And has those taxes kept up with the rising costs of road repair? I am willing to bet the answer is no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2014, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccjarider View Post
You seem to be have some sort of weird Portland luv and you are a Portland apologist/cheerleader.
In your mind, ANYTHING Portland does is great and no one can argue otherwise, lest the aura of Portland greatness that you have be tarnished.

You continue to point out that streets repair requires $. In your mind if Portland gov't says it needs the $; then it must be OK and true.

This is wildly superfluous and silly. This city taxes the populace already at a great level (above the national average). The funds have been generated for decades to take care of road maintenance. The city has chosen to misappropriate the funds.

The city MUST be challenged to change it's ways and live within the means it already has.
If that means getting out of areas it has no business being in then - so be it. From my office, I see empty buses running all day long up and down the road. Close down some of the waste!!!

If there is no BIG challenge to city forcing explanation of WHY this is needed in 2014; it just shows that the folks here are nothing but sheeple.
What you see is not always the same as what the real numbers say. I see buses everyday that are full of people, the bus I ride from time to time is often full.

I guess this forum needs a few people who actually like Portland posting in it rather than just those here looking to complain about everything Portland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2014, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Houston
1,257 posts, read 2,653,820 times
Reputation: 1236
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
What you see is not always the same as what the real numbers say. I see buses everyday that are full of people, the bus I ride from time to time is often full.

I guess this forum needs a few people who actually like Portland posting in it rather than just those here looking to complain about everything Portland.
I like Portland just fine. I think most of us have some sort of emotional attachment to Portland. What I do not like is irresponsible government. If you look at Portland's spending on projects it shows the priority of the city leaders. It was not infrastructure maintenance. Asking for new sources of revenue for roads when there is a system in place smacks of "well, we spent the money we had for roads on something else". I had an uncle like that. Nobody likes him either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2014, 02:38 PM
 
1,666 posts, read 1,018,050 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
I guess this forum needs a few people who actually like Portland posting in it rather than just those here looking to complain about everything Portland.
What this forum needs is people who view PDX objectively. The good, the bad and the ugly. Not cheerleaders nor naysayers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2014, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
10,990 posts, read 20,567,401 times
Reputation: 8261
But how does the city know you owe them anything? The arts tax administration was a fiasco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2014, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Just outside of Portland
4,828 posts, read 7,454,667 times
Reputation: 5117
I wonder what the saturation point as far as local taxes and "fees" go for the "normal" Portland resident is?
Do our city government leaders know, or will they just keep asking for more and more until a big revolt starts?

When will people start howling enough is enough?

And I wonder why people complain about "high" property taxes, but still don't realize that fully one third of those taxes are self imposed.

This is a crazy city sometimes.



Tell you what.

I'll voluntarily pay the street tax (even though I live outside Portland), if the city agrees to subject itself to an objective financial audit, the results of which will be made public...

If the audit comes out squeeky clean, and there is no evidence of gross financial mis-management, I will pay triple.

Safe bet, I'm thinkin'

Last edited by pdxMIKEpdx; 11-17-2014 at 04:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2014, 04:05 PM
 
4,059 posts, read 5,620,293 times
Reputation: 2892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nell Plotts View Post
But how does the city know you owe them anything? The arts tax administration was a fiasco.
Right - that's the real issue.

"Collections" in and of itself is pretty simple, but figuring out who owes what (and verifying data that is dubious) is a more complex task.

It seems unlikely the OR Dept. of Revenue is going to open up its tax rolls to the City just on Hales' say-so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top