Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Did you put down 20% on your first home?
Less than 20% 103 50.00%
20% 57 27.67%
More than 20% 46 22.33%
Voters: 206. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-05-2015, 09:59 PM
 
1,399 posts, read 1,801,528 times
Reputation: 3256

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dazzleman View Post
I put down exactly 20% for my first house. I think it's better to save up some money rather than put down a really small down payment and take more debt. Inability to save for a down payment is a good indication that a person is not a good candidate for home ownership. And weak lending standards that allow such low down payments inflate housing prices, making the affordability/foreclosure problem worse.
I think that is a very broad statement. Many people for various reasons choose to not put down twenty percent. I do not think it always equates to an inability to save.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-06-2015, 01:47 AM
 
6,438 posts, read 6,925,737 times
Reputation: 8743
No, I put down $10,000 (including closing costs) on a $112,000 home in 1985. Some of the $10,000 was borrowed. I was a young kid, just started my first professional job. My wife and I had one kid and one on the way, and had to live somewhere. We could have kept renting and having to move every year or two (that's what the SFH rental market is like) but with kids that is not a good idea. The mortgage was subprime and the rate was 13.375%, about 2% above prime.

I paid off the borrowed part of the down payment when I got my next bonus, paid off the mortgage with a prime mortgage in 1993, and paid off the prime mortgage in 2005. The house is now worth about $600K and "it's all mine"!

That is what the subprime market is for. It is possible to make subprime loans profitably. It is not possible to do so when the government is telling you whom to lend it to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 08:39 AM
 
10,225 posts, read 7,595,616 times
Reputation: 23168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninotchka P View Post
It has been asserted in another thread that putting 20% down is an outdated concept. In fact, this assertion is something I often hear from would-be first time buyers who don't know "how anyone could save 20%".

So I'm adding a poll.
No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Virginia
10,103 posts, read 6,447,894 times
Reputation: 27665
I bought my first home in 1985 with no down payment. In addition, I rolled 100% of the closing costs into the 12 year mortgage from the credit union. Sweetest real estate deal I ever had!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 02:11 PM
 
243 posts, read 547,789 times
Reputation: 289
Just bought this year and put down 20%. Cash on hand of $30K was insufficient, so I borrowed from my 401K @ 2% for the rest. It was the best source of funds available to me. Selling funds from my brokerage account would result in a lot of cap gains tax, and withdrawing Roth IRA contributions would put a dent in my retirement plans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 06:43 PM
 
14,078 posts, read 16,622,739 times
Reputation: 17654
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBayBoomer View Post
I put down less than 20% many years ago, but would never do that again, nor would I consider selling to someone who could not put 20% down and pay all their own closing costs to buy my house.
If you need to sell badly enough, you will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 07:04 PM
 
Location: New York, NY (Washington Heights)
201 posts, read 389,229 times
Reputation: 230
I put 50% down buying my first home (in FL), but part of that downpayment was life insurance proceeds from when my mom passed away two years prior. Last year I bought my second home, a co-op in NYC, and was only able to put slightly over 20% down - much, much higher COL situation and it took me living here for almost 10 years to save and get the downpayment high enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,404,948 times
Reputation: 73937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninotchka P View Post
No inheritance money.
45% down bc we aggressively saved for 5 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 07:07 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,404,948 times
Reputation: 73937
Quote:
Originally Posted by cargoman View Post
I think that is a very broad statement. Many people for various reasons choose to not put down twenty percent. I do not think it always equates to an inability to save.
The vast majority of the 'reason' isn't savvy financial maneuvering. It's inability to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2015, 08:27 AM
 
6,775 posts, read 5,495,892 times
Reputation: 17669
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv4horses View Post
Mine was 10% but the seller held the paper with a 5 yr balloon. Interest rates were about 14% so I refinanced at 4th yr when rates had dropped.

Today I would suggest to never put down less than 20%. When PMI is required (usually when the buyer puts down less than 20%), that is just money down the drain.
Normally, I'd agree on the 20%, but:

In our case, the insurance is less than $800 over a 5 year period {at most},and we feel we can get it to the 20% equity in far less than that, so worth it.

Once a home owner reaches the magical 20%, they can have it eliminated, it may cost another appraisal fee to drop it, but again, in our case, a moot point. The $12-1300 it will take to get there{the $800 plus $4-500 for appraisal} is a moot point compared to sacrificing and putting the 20% down.

Many people don't have the 15% we are putting down, or even a nice round 10% for down payment, so we are lucky in that. We can always lump-sum it for the break in the insurance.

We want to leave ourselves some breathing room fro moving and immediate improvements to the house so we decided on 15% instead.

Now, if we can get an agreement on the deal. THE seller wants seller's market rates in a strong buyer's market!!!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top