Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-28-2023, 01:39 PM
 
120 posts, read 147,168 times
Reputation: 92

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
i didn’t see anything about the ops income level or credit score …

regardless of the equity in the home , one still needs to have income other then the money in the bank to qualify for a heloc and a good credit score.

the days of just home equity counting are gone ..they want to see actual income now and not the funds you borrowed coming back and counting as income

Thanks, everyone! Yes, I have a steady income and am aware of what I would qualify for with a HELOC, which would be sufficient for renovations, etc.

I guess my question was more about.....is it safe to put all your savings into a house or better to scatter your money into various investments?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2023, 02:10 PM
 
106,578 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
depends .

my view and the view of some retirement researchers is if you are retired and have toned down your investing aggressiveness then it likely will not be a good idea to take a mortgage , however you don’t want to leave your self cash poor either so a partial mortgage may be the best way.

why is a mortgage not a great idea in retirement?

because when we invest and take on risk and we are investing our own money , any return over the interest rate you are paying is a win .

it can be 1% more and you still win .

but when you take a mortgage so you can keep your money invested , in effect you are borrowing money to invest .

that is a whole different ball game because now most of us want a risk premium over what we would expect with our own money .

if safe treasuries with no risk are paying 4-5% , well i would normally expect with my own money a few percent over that .

now the we are taking on the risk of using borrowed money i would want another 1-2% as a risk premium over my own money .

if one is 90-100% equities , there could be enough delta there to go for the mortgage .

but now in retirement many of us use a balanced portfolio…there is not enough risk premium there over just using my own money to warrant using borrowed money .

famous researcher michael kitces has brought this point to light .

you may not want to have that balanced portfolio and a mortgage in retirement..

a down year and thousands in interest on top of it can really hurt sequence risk

https://www.kitces.com/blog/why-keep...orth-the-risk/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2023, 02:31 PM
 
5,962 posts, read 3,706,857 times
Reputation: 16985
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! (Snore)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2023, 02:33 PM
 
106,578 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chas863 View Post
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! (Snore)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2023, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
6,340 posts, read 4,892,353 times
Reputation: 17999
Quote:
Originally Posted by NORTY FLATZ View Post
(Not paying rent/mort, sure makes cash pile-up quick!)
Very true.

I sold two homes in 1998 (my primary and a rental) and bought a house for cash.

I worked for another 8 years, every paycheck (less expenses) went into savings, which allowed me to retire at 60 with a very large retirement fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2023, 07:35 AM
 
106,578 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
or the reverse works well or better

investing your own cash or leaving it invested and taking the mortgage , providing you are investing aggressively as one should be in their accumulation stage can be even better .

actually spending that huge amount of cash up front then trying to save it back up again has one huge disadvantage..LOSS OF TIME

time is your biggest friend when dealing with investments and the more time you give the maximum amount of money the less dependent you are on a shorter time frame being a good one .

so by the time you replace all that cash that was spent to the point you have those same dollars or close to it you lost time.

that puts a lot of pressure on a shorter time frame to have to be a good one.

many shoot themselves in the foot by taking all extra cash and throwing extra payments to the mortgage , then waiting to pay off the mortgage to first commit a substantial more in dollars .

they lose time and that can be a big loss if that shorter time frame is not so good.

in the mean time they have the same appreciation on the house locked in whether they paid cash or a mortgage or paid off a mortgage sooner .

the longer the time you have , the less risk that you are going to be hurt by another lost decade for stocks , or two decades like the we had in the 1960’s or lower interest rates effecting your growth in fixed income.

there are a lot of parameters that have to be considered when comparing as well as time frame , retired and spending down as well as aggressiveness of your investments and risk premium.

most people over look the things they are unaware of since the human brain can only evaluate what it knows of and it can not incorporate what it doesn’t realize.

so despite chas863 snoring, these are all critical points to think about

Last edited by mathjak107; 08-29-2023 at 08:00 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2023, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Florida & Arizona
5,975 posts, read 7,365,693 times
Reputation: 7591
I have cash and and I have a low interest (2.5%) mortgage that will continue into my retirement. In my opinion, it would be foolish to pay off the mortgage when I am taking that cash and investing it even conservatively to make double the interest on the mortgage.

If I paid off the mortgage I would have more disposable income, but that money is now invested in a house, which ties it up for the most part and limits me to gains when the house sells, ideally at a profit.

Cash is king. Period.

RM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2023, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
6,340 posts, read 4,892,353 times
Reputation: 17999
Quote:
Originally Posted by MortonR View Post
I have cash and and I have a low interest (2.5%) mortgage that will continue into my retirement. In my opinion, it would be foolish to pay off the mortgage when I am taking that cash and investing it even conservatively to make double the interest on the mortgage.
That's right. In your case, it would be foolish to pay off a 2.5% mortgage when you can make 5% or better just on risk free CDs. Maybe better on other investments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2023, 04:32 AM
 
106,578 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
Quote:
Originally Posted by MortonR View Post
I have cash and and I have a low interest (2.5%) mortgage that will continue into my retirement. In my opinion, it would be foolish to pay off the mortgage when I am taking that cash and investing it even conservatively to make double the interest on the mortgage.

If I paid off the mortgage I would have more disposable income, but that money is now invested in a house, which ties it up for the most part and limits me to gains when the house sells, ideally at a profit.

Cash is king. Period.

RM
for most of history cash is trash …..it is needed for spending but it has not produced positive real returns after inflation and taxes in cash instruments more often then doing so .

so it needs to be invested elsewhere for growth .

on the other hand any better producing liquid assets can be instantly liquidated and converted to cash for spending .

i just did it to buy a new car .

so cash is generally going to be trash as they say over the longer term as an investment
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2023, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Sandy Eggo's North County
10,292 posts, read 6,813,150 times
Reputation: 16839
Quote:
Originally Posted by adjusterjack View Post
That's right. In your case, it would be foolish to pay off a 2.5% mortgage when you can make 5% or better just on risk free CDs. Maybe better on other investments.
Don't forget the banking institution is going to "1009-INT" you, so that may chip away at your realized total.

That 5% could very easily become 4%, after taxes....

But, still, there's virtually no risk (as long as you stay under the FDIC max.)

There ARE ways around that "Max" but that's for another thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top