Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-13-2008, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Halfway between Number 4 Privet Drive and Forks, WA
1,516 posts, read 4,591,647 times
Reputation: 677

Advertisements

It's not business, it's irresponsibility. That's why they should never be allowed a home mortgage again. Ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-13-2008, 08:09 AM
 
1,151 posts, read 2,994,766 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
It's good to see lenders getting away from 100% financing and requiring some down payment. A seller should have some investment in a home they lose if they decide to walk.
Yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2008, 08:10 AM
 
1,151 posts, read 2,994,766 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViewFromThePeak View Post
100% agreed. Additionally, the process of securitization has anonymized the mortgage. Jim Bob who teaches little league didn't and owns the corner bank doesn't own the loan. Some Chinese investor who bought the mortgage backed security does. Why does someone feel a sense of honor to pay back some foreign investor they've never met and will never meet?
Because you received a better interest rate from your lender in exchange for agreeing to allow them to securitize your loan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2008, 08:23 AM
 
3,859 posts, read 10,331,280 times
Reputation: 2751
Why not. Our congress wants to bail them out anyway-why should they have any responsibility?

I mean they all bought up way above what they can afford. The rest of us bought what we could afford and why should we not have to pay our mortgage and bail them out too? Whether congress votes to bail them out or they walk away from the mortgage-either way the people who do things right end up paying for it.

Just because you qualify for a mortgage of X does not mean you had to take it. But then again- they have to not only keep up with but out do the Joneses.

Whe we purchased our condo in October-we qualified for $100,000 MORE than the condo price. We never could have afforded it. I would have loved a big house with a big back yard but chose to be responsible. Now I need to bail these people out? Now they are going to walk away and negatively effect the economy because they chose to be irresponsible?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2008, 08:46 AM
 
2,197 posts, read 7,394,730 times
Reputation: 1702
A lot of people have lost a bundle in the stock market, because financial institutions and mutual funds failed to disclose their exposure to CDOs and subprime loans. The returns didn't justify anywhere near that kind of risk. So if the government is going to bail out the homeowners who knowingly took on those foolish risks, they should certainly extend the same bailout to unsuspecting investors who lost money because of them. Or they should do the equitable thing and bail out no one. It's painful, but you move on. You shouldn't be allowed to move on and do it all over again, on someone else's dime.

People can't just walk away from bad investments. We sell the stocks and eat the loss. Why should the homeowner be any different?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2008, 08:57 AM
 
930 posts, read 2,424,035 times
Reputation: 1007
GoodByeHollywood just made some of the most accurate and well stated points that I have ever read. Rep for you.

Not a Real Estate Agent. FUNNY!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2008, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
9,059 posts, read 12,975,389 times
Reputation: 1401
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodbyehollywood View Post
A lot of people have lost a bundle in the stock market, because financial institutions and mutual funds failed to disclose their exposure to CDOs and subprime loans. The returns didn't justify anywhere near that kind of risk. So if the government is going to bail out the homeowners who knowingly took on those foolish risks, they should certainly extend the same bailout to unsuspecting investors who lost money because of them. Or they should do the equitable thing and bail out no one. It's painful, but you move on. You shouldn't be allowed to move on and do it all over again, on someone else's dime.

People can't just walk away from bad investments. We sell the stocks and eat the loss. Why should the homeowner be any different?
However, you can walk away from a call option. The contract on owning a home is similar to a call option, with your credit score being the only premium placed on the contract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2008, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Gary, WV & Springfield, ME
5,826 posts, read 9,611,034 times
Reputation: 17328
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodbyehollywood View Post
When people can no longer regulate themselves, Big Brother steps in and monitors everything we do.
I beg to differ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2008, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Orange County
200 posts, read 561,601 times
Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViewFromThePeak View Post
100% agreed. Additionally, the process of securitization has anonymized the mortgage. Jim Bob who teaches little league didn't and owns the corner bank doesn't own the loan. Some Chinese investor who bought the mortgage backed security does. Why does someone feel a sense of honor to pay back some foreign investor they've never met and will never meet?
BECAUSE THEY PROVIDED YOU W/ THE MONEY AND THE OPPORTUNITY. SOUNDS LIKE THE VIEW IS FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE THEN THE PEAK. What does being foreign have to do w/ it????????????????????????????????????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2008, 10:02 AM
 
1,151 posts, read 2,994,766 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by OCNYISHOME View Post
What does being foreign have to do w/ it?
Fear / hate mongering. What else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top