Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-30-2010, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Niceville, FL
13,258 posts, read 22,845,258 times
Reputation: 16416

Advertisements

Lapse in National Flood Insurance Program leaves some Floridians hanging

Quote:
And the National Flood Insurance Program expired on Sunday. The earliest lawmakers could consider renewing it is on April 12 when they return from recess.
Just heads up for anyone who might be impacted by this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2010, 03:28 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,939,504 times
Reputation: 12828
Idiots! How many homes need to close nationwide before April 12th?

How many areas of the country are undergoing Spring floods right now? Isn't the Northeastern US experiencing "historic" floods?

Government was too busy going after health insurance to conduct the business they already have. Incompetant fools run this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2010, 04:03 PM
 
Location: A little suburb of Houston
3,702 posts, read 18,216,670 times
Reputation: 2092
So much for the housing crisis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2010, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post

Government was too busy going after health insurance to conduct the business they already have. Incompetant fools run this country.
Another way of looking at this is why should the Government continue to subsidize insurance for properties in flood zones? The entire program is unsound from an actuarial basis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2010, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Newport, NC
955 posts, read 4,090,587 times
Reputation: 724
I agree with middle aged mom. People need to make responsible, informed choices when buying a home. It should not be the governments place to "bail out" people living in a flood zone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2010, 02:35 PM
 
11,642 posts, read 23,913,732 times
Reputation: 12274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rtom45 View Post
I agree with middle aged mom. People need to make responsible, informed choices when buying a home. It should not be the governments place to "bail out" people living in a flood zone.
National Flood insurance is not a welfare program. It is paid for via premiums. When you pay for insurance that is MANDATORY you expect it to be there when you need it. If I could buy it from a private insurer I would but the government is the ONLY provider of this insurance.

I was required to pay flood insurance on a home I owned in Saratogo County, NY. I never had any claims on that policy (it's an insurance policy). I am also required to maintain a policy on my home in FL. I have never collected on that policy. If I need to collect on the policy at some point it would be nice for the program to be intact, since I have been paying into it for at least 15 years.

I certainly home that your insurers are there for you when you need them. NFID is not a welfare program for people living in flood zones. People pay premiums every year and most never collect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2010, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Momma_bear View Post

National Flood insurance is not a welfare program.
I think a history lesson may be in order here.

NFIP was formed in 1968 after private insurers refused to insure flood risks because it was not economically feasible to do so.

NFIP routinely borrows from the Treasury to pay claims in excess of premiums, because such premiums are not reflective of true risks, a form of welfare.

Prior to 2006, NFIP annual debt to the treasury ranged from $50- 917 million. I believe it currently stands at $19.2 billion.

On 3/11, Congress extended NFIP's authority to 9/30/10.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2010, 04:18 PM
 
11,642 posts, read 23,913,732 times
Reputation: 12274
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
I think a history lesson may be in order here.

NFIP was formed in 1968 after private insurers refused to insure flood risks because it was not economically feasible to do so.

NFIP routinely borrows from the Treasury to pay claims in excess of premiums, because such premiums are not reflective of true risks, a form of welfare.

Prior to 2006, NFIP annual debt to the treasury ranged from $50- 917 million. I believe it currently stands at $19.2 billion.

On 3/11, Congress extended NFIP's authority to 9/30/10.
Perhaps this is all true but NFIP is still not a welfare program.

If the government needs to charge more it should do so. I can't see how it pays out more than it takes in as I know a whole busload of people like myself who have been paying premiums for years without making any claims. It must be very inefficient.

It is flat out WRONG to discontinue a program that the government itself REQUIRES.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2010, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
They did the same to a medicare item..4/1 it gets cut 21%. Folk are hoping when Congress gets back from break they'll "fix it".

LOL..as the government assumes more controls over us..we're gonna start dreading their "breaks".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2010, 07:10 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,397 posts, read 60,592,880 times
Reputation: 61018
http://www.thechesapeakebay.com/isabel_photos/north_beach/mvc-015.jpg (broken link)

The owner of the house in the foreground let his flood insurance lapse. After all, he's 2 ft. above mean high tide so he should be safe. At least that was the reasoning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top