Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Life would definitely be different, LOL! But it still takes 2 to tango (or 3, or...); there has to be mutual attraction. And women would still be vulnerable, due to the power differential. Women would still be at risk for abuse, and so would still have to be cautious. They would still be vulnerable to being simply used for sex, without any regard to their needs. These are the main reasons women are cautious now, and that wouldn't change if there were no such thing as STD's. And with modern contraception methods, there's not much risk of pregnancy, anyway.
I don't think so. Those were never my reasons for holding off with someone - so I can't imagine that I would have lived my life much differently under those circumstances.
No, I would not. I would still rather have that chemistry, bond, and shared love with just 1.
Sex with multiple partners doesn't sound so rewarding to me - it sounds more like seeking instant intimacy, and affection, and then realizing later it's nothing but meaningless sex .... That has to feel somewhat empty, no ??
If there was 0% chance of STD's and Pregnancy then would you have sex with lots of multiple partners?
No.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
