Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hell yes. That would annoy me to death. Mush is for babies, I'm a grown man.
But what is it today with the feminist movement and women trying to be all hard and stuff now? I'm not talking about being tough or just liking similar things/hobbies etc...
I'm talking about being hard and by doing so makes them somewhat abrasive and stand-offish.
Like to pick fights, even bully men.....
WTF?
Not for me, they always know who WILL win that battle.
I don't know how I feel either way. I've never been in a relationship before so it's possible that I might have a tiny problem with it because I'm not used to it.
As I understand, it's different for many people. Some (men and women alike) like their mates to be clingy. Others want someone less clingy. It depends on the person.
It's all going to depend on how into you the guy is. If he's uncertain or not quite smitten, and you're hanging all over him showering him with affection, it's probably going to turn him off. If you're both in love, he'll love it.
I'm not crazy about that pet name, it's kind of silly. I prefer "baby".
I guess you can say I'm both physically and verbally affectionate. I don't know if it's too much though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lol-its-good4U
Not to me, but just don't let your guard down.
My guard? What do you mean?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.