Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2013, 01:29 PM
 
36,529 posts, read 30,863,516 times
Reputation: 32796

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AverageGuy2006 View Post
It isn't that complicated. IMO, the one that handles the situation is probably the 'alpha' between the two people. (I really dislike the term alpha)

3. I guess if one person directs the other person to kill it, they could also be considered the one that wears the pants, even though that person doesn't directly kill the spider.

It was kind of sort of a joke, but IMO it is a decent indicator of who wears the pants. I just didnt consider option 3 in my original thesis.


I think the best solution is to let the cats do it. It's free entertainment for the cat, and provides them with some stimulation.

Mer-ow
Maybe its too simplistic. As fleetiebelle stated often each partner is better suited to handle particular situations. Life is more complicated than a spider as you pointed out in #3.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2013, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,523,000 times
Reputation: 17617
We both wear pants in our homes. Except when my wife wears a skirt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 01:53 PM
 
2,758 posts, read 4,959,118 times
Reputation: 3014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
We both wear pants in our homes. Except when my wife wears a skirt.
What about togas, or hula skirts? Or even kilts? On Halloween, many couples must get confused. And what if you live in Ireland where Kilts are worn more frequently ?
Or parade days when guys wear kilts ?

Aye aye aye....

Where's the cat? I think I saw a spider....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 02:18 PM
 
2,650 posts, read 3,012,284 times
Reputation: 3466
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
Maybe its too simplistic. As fleetiebelle stated often each partner is better suited to handle particular situations. Life is more complicated than a spider as you pointed out in #3.
Yep. In my marriage we played to each other's strengths. Can't say as though I always wore the pants, it really depended on what she laid out for me. Sometimes it was shorts. She seemed to feel dressing myself was not one of my strengths...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,365,577 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by High_Plains_Retired View Post
There is no wearing of pants all the time in a successful modern marriage at least in a situation where neither party is a psychological wimp. Normally someone has to be the predominate leader otherwise the marriage loses its ability to function in emergencies. However, an intelligent leader knows that one person should not lead all the time. If your family is facing a particular serious situation, the predominate leader should be willing to relinquish their role if their partner is more knowledgeable and/or experienced in that situation.

I will add that, if you do not have the ability to say to the other party that you're sorry when it is warranted, or say "I love you" daily, you had better marry a wimp.

JMO based on 42 years of marriage.
I do emergencies bc I am professionally trained to do so.

No predominate leader required.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 08:17 PM
 
15,446 posts, read 21,354,685 times
Reputation: 28701
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
I do emergencies bc I am professionally trained to do so.

No predominate leader required.
You do the emergencies because you are trained to do emergencies? Isn't that what I just said?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 08:21 PM
 
3,138 posts, read 2,780,306 times
Reputation: 5099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight2009 View Post
I very much believe in full 100% equality of both genders, in a romantic relationship.

With an appropriate amount of compassion, egalitarianism, respect, kindness, and patience, there is no real need for either party to a relationship to have to wear the pants, in it

If someone that I hypothetically cared about romantically insisted on always being the one to control everything we did, or unilaterally wear the pants, we would not be compatible due to that fundamental inequality, and that relationship would not be one that I would stay in.
I agree with Knight2009 here.

For my boyfriend and I, there is no power struggle. And I'm so grateful that there is b/c we both can have strong personalities from time to time, but it has never resulted in a perceived power issue between us.

My job definitely places me in a position where I'm required to be aggressive and in control, which is not my personality outside of work. The opposite is true for my boyfriend. I definitely do encourage him to take more of a leadership role in our relationship with certain things...but this is in part due to my conservative nature and desire to see him be more proactive about xyz.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,365,577 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by High_Plains_Retired View Post
You do the emergencies because you are trained to do emergencies? Isn't that what I just said?
You implied that without one person predominately leading, the home would fall apart in emergencies.

I say hogwash.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 08:26 PM
 
15,446 posts, read 21,354,685 times
Reputation: 28701
Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
You implied that without one person predominately leading, the home would fall apart in emergencies.

I say hogwash.

You seem to say hogwash a lot. I'm betting you are the dominate one in your marriage, or former one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2013, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,365,577 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by High_Plains_Retired View Post
You seem to say hogwash a lot. I'm betting you are the dominate one in your marriage, or former one.
No.

I have no desire to push people around or dominate.

I am a leader at work...that's enough responsibility and say-so for me.

At home, I am pretty laid back.

Btw, nice dodge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top