If some women say they need sex every day (referenced in another thread)...

[Hivemind31]

Originally Posted by freemkt

Here's another way to look at it:

Arbitrarily define the effort (assuming skill and care) required to bring a man to orgasm as 1 unit of effort. (A handy convenience of arbitrariness is that the numbers work out just the way you want.)

The average effort required to bring a woman to orgasm (assuming the same skill and care as above), especially in the case of multiple orgasms is probably going to be less than 1 unit of effort, and declining over some range in the case of multiple orgasms.

So 1 unit of effort typically gets more/better results when applied to women than when applied to men (and over some range, marginal results improve with additional units of effort). This suggests that a lot of men are either ignorant, selfish, or lazy.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the underlined imply that it is easier to bring a woman to orgasm than a man? (i.e. 1 unit of effort to bring a man to orgasm, less than 1 unit of effort to bring a woman to orgasm). That assumption alone invalidates your entire post, in my opinion. Sure, sometimes that's the case (and in those cases, I'd agree that the man not keeping up his end would qualify as ignorant/selfish/lazy), but I think that's a FAR reaching assumption for most.

Edit: Should have kept reading, JustJulia beat me to it. Glad I wasn't the only one who saw that.

[2mares]

Originally Posted by onihC

Agree agree. Someone said getting dumped before climaxing may be the reason why women may think twice about this. A guy could also have doubts about having casual sex with a woman who just lays there like a starfish or deer on headlights and be dumped before even getting things started. Risks for casual sex go both ways.

Like a starfish?

Well at least the starfish still functional.

[Take A Selfie]

Sex is never casual.