Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-28-2014, 12:37 PM
 
12,535 posts, read 15,204,354 times
Reputation: 29088

Advertisements

This codependent thing again? It was the subject of a long thread about a year ago.

Bottom line is that both people need to get something out of a marriage, you can't make someone else happy, your happiness is your responsibility, and no, you can't always put someone else's needs ahead of yours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2014, 12:58 PM
 
324 posts, read 294,537 times
Reputation: 303
I'm glad it isn't for me!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2014, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Katonah, NY
21,192 posts, read 25,171,795 times
Reputation: 22276
A lot of my friends posted this to their Facebook pages awhile ago. The whole thing kind of rubbed me the wrong way. Personally, I'm glad that I didn't marry someone that had to be talked into marrying me because it was for me and not him. My husband couldn't wait to marry me because he wanted to marry me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 05:54 AM
 
Location: Hampton Roads
3,032 posts, read 4,736,446 times
Reputation: 4425
As someone who is about to get married after 4.5 years of being together, I can understand that you shouldn't be entirely selfish and that you should be a partner to your spouse and do everything you can to make that partnership work.

However, I don't agree to stop doing the things that make YOU happy, too, that are entirely independent of this other person. Don't get so into things that you don't have your individual self either.

I see this with my brother a lot. His wife yells at him about what clothes he is wearing because his outfit should always match hers when they go out. This article would say, "Change your clothes to make your wife happy, because her happiness is all that matters." I would say don't forget that you are also an individual with your own thoughts, feelings, actions! Don't give in to a point where you lose yourself especially if this other person is not reciprocating!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Brentwood, Tennessee
49,927 posts, read 59,955,675 times
Reputation: 98359
Quote:
Originally Posted by randomlikeme View Post

However, I don't agree to stop doing the things that make YOU happy, too, that are entirely independent of this other person. Don't get so into things that you don't have your individual self either.

I see this with my brother a lot. His wife yells at him about what clothes he is wearing because his outfit should always match hers when they go out. This article would say, "Change your clothes to make your wife happy, because her happiness is all that matters." I would say don't forget that you are also an individual with your own thoughts, feelings, actions! Don't give in to a point where you lose yourself ...
That's not what the article said at all.

It's only co-dependent if you're doing it wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Hampton Roads
3,032 posts, read 4,736,446 times
Reputation: 4425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wmsn4Life View Post
That's not what the article said at all.

It's only co-dependent if you're doing it wrong.
I still feel that way. I read the article over a year ago and didn't feel like re-reading it because that is how I felt the last time. That while "marriage isn't for you" - it's not for THEM either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 10:04 AM
 
5,481 posts, read 8,579,715 times
Reputation: 8284
If as a man, you have no desire to get married and are doing solely for your spouse's happiness, then why shouldnt the same rules apply to her. Why not just NOT get married instead of making your husband commit to marriage instead of just being together without being "certified"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Brentwood, Tennessee
49,927 posts, read 59,955,675 times
Reputation: 98359
Quote:
Originally Posted by deevel79 View Post
If as a man, you have no desire to get married and are doing solely for your spouse's happiness, then why shouldnt the same rules apply to her. Why not just NOT get married instead of making your husband commit to marriage instead of just being together without being "certified"?
In marriage, the same rules DO apply to "her"!!! The concept isn't just for men.

It's reciprocal. BOTH partners are supposed to put their spouse's need first. And then ... guess what happens???

Both people get their needs fulfilled. Ta-daaaa!

Unless you're married to a selfish baby who doesn't get it.

I don't see why this is so hard for people to grasp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 10:24 AM
 
5,481 posts, read 8,579,715 times
Reputation: 8284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wmsn4Life View Post
In marriage, the same rules DO apply to "her"!!! The concept isn't just for men.

It's reciprocal. BOTH partners are supposed to put their spouse's need first. And then ... guess what happens???

Both people get their needs fulfilled. Ta-daaaa!

Unless you're married to a selfish baby who doesn't get it.

I don't see why this is so hard for people to grasp.
Ok so take this scenario.

He loves her unconditionally but just isnt keen on the actual process of marriage for whatever reason, but can see himself with her for the rest of his life.

She loves him unconditionally and wants to get married as all women do, but understand that while he loves her, he's not interested in going thru the entire marriage process.

Who gives in and makes the sacrifice since "BOTH partners are supposed to put their spouse's needs first?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2014, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Brentwood, Tennessee
49,927 posts, read 59,955,675 times
Reputation: 98359
Quote:
Originally Posted by deevel79 View Post
Ok so take this scenario.

He loves her unconditionally but just isnt keen on the actual process of marriage for whatever reason, but can see himself with her for the rest of his life.

She loves him unconditionally and wants to get married as all women do, but understand that while he loves her, he's not interested in going thru the entire marriage process.

Who gives in and makes the sacrifice since "BOTH partners are supposed to put their spouse's needs first?"


If they can't even get past that step, they're doomed anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top