Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-03-2018, 11:51 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,962,945 times
Reputation: 40635

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ_ View Post
Yes, of course. The brain provides enough function to analyze data and express emotions. My disagreement was in your suggestion that I can separate the two, which is impossible. .
It might be for you, but it isn't at all for many people.




Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ_ View Post
But I do feel that love is not the only component needed to construct a functional, long term relationship.


Of course it isn't. But without it, there is nothing. Lots of X, Ys, and Zs can be negotiated or set aside and have a long healthy, mutually fulfilling relationships if the love is there. And you can have almost everything practical align perfectly (communication styles, life goals, values, character, blah blah blah) and there be no love, and it will never work. Love is the hardest part to actually find. You're still coming across as clinical about this. Dating, esp early on, yeah, its assessing the other person and them assessing you, but it's really about going out and having fun while doing so. You're not projecting any fun. I'm sure you're coming along and are better than you were, that's great, keep working on it.

 
Old 07-03-2018, 11:54 AM
RJ_
 
743 posts, read 392,538 times
Reputation: 814
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Of course it isn't. But without it, there is nothing. Lots of X, Ys, and Zs can be negotiated or set aside and have a long healthy, mutually fulfilling relationships if the love is there. And you can have almost everything practical align perfectly (communication styles, life goals, values, character, blah blah blah) and there be no love, and it will never work. Love is the hardest part to actually find. You're still coming across as clinical about this. Dating, esp early on, yeah, its assessing the other person and them assessing you, but it's really about going out and having fun while doing so. You're not projecting any fun. I'm sure you're coming along and are better than you were, that's great, keep working on it.
My goal is not to have fun, my goal is find a viable long-term partner. I am willing to give your approach a try if it's proved successful for you. Case studies with actual results are really the best way to make conclusions.
 
Old 07-03-2018, 12:01 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,962,945 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ_ View Post
My goal is not to have fun, my goal is find a viable long-term partner. I am willing to give your approach a try if it's proved successful for you. Case studies with actual results are really the best way to make conclusions.


Ok, I give up. You don't seem to get dating at all, and don't seem to want to. You're still looking at it as an equation to be solved to get your desired solution. That's not how it works. Connecting with a person isn't an equation.


And you are still singularly focused on yourself. To a fault. YOUR communication style so YOU can feel honest. Their communication style so YOU can understand. And what YOU want, without any mention of their having fun and being happy with you (even if you don't care about fun).


I just noticed you're a new poster. I am hoping this is in jest and I've been had. Seriously. I'm out.
 
Old 07-03-2018, 12:11 PM
RJ_
 
743 posts, read 392,538 times
Reputation: 814
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Ok, I give up. You don't seem to get dating at all, and don't seem to want to. You're still looking at it as an equation to be solved to get your desired solution. That's not how it works. Connecting with a person isn't an equation.


And you are still singularly focused on yourself. To a fault. YOUR communication style so YOU can feel honest. Their communication style so YOU can understand. And what YOU want, without any mention of their having fun and being happy with you (even if you don't care about fun).


I am hoping this is in jest and I've been had. Seriously.
You're right in that I probably don't comprehend all the nuances that go along with wooing a partner. That's honestly the reason I'm on this forum, to understand better. And I'm not resisting your approach, I'm just trying to process it in a way that's logical. Obviously I want to be happy all the time, I just don't think it's possible, not for anyone. I think we can experience periods of happiness, but we don't live in Utopia, therefore happiness is fleeting. As such, happiness is not a realistic goal.

As far as fun and enjoyment. I like those too. I've been chatting with a woman from Florida and we've had both deep discussions and just frivolous chit chat that made me laugh. We even exchanged phone numbers last night and I'm going to call her this evening. My compulsion is to process everything through the filters of logic, and I'm resisting that urge right now because I don't want to blow it with this girl. But it's very uncomfortable allowing my emotional brain to take lead. I have to remind myself that the emotional brain is practical just as the analytical brain is.
 
Old 07-03-2018, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
20,393 posts, read 14,661,936 times
Reputation: 39487
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ_ View Post
You're right in that I probably don't comprehend all the nuances that go along with wooing a partner. That's honestly the reason I'm on this forum, to understand better. And I'm not resisting your approach, I'm just trying to process it in a way that's logical. Obviously I want to be happy all the time, I just don't think it's possible, not for anyone. I think we can experience periods of happiness, but we don't live in Utopia, therefore happiness is fleeting. As such, happiness is not a realistic goal.

As far as fun and enjoyment. I like those too. I've been chatting with a woman from Florida and we've had both deep discussions and just frivolous chit chat that made me laugh. We even exchanged phone numbers last night and I'm going to call her this evening. My compulsion is to process everything through the filters of logic, and I'm resisting that urge right now because I don't want to blow it with this girl. But it's very uncomfortable allowing my emotional brain to take lead. I have to remind myself that the emotional brain is practical just as the analytical brain is.
Logic doesn't suck! The way I see it is this... You use the emotional part to have a good time. But you don't let your feelings drive major life choices. So you go along, and your emotions are like "Yes, this is great!" but it is wise to make sure you're using your logic before you negotiate serious commitments or move in together or have kids and especially before a marriage. There does have to be a balance between "This is strictly business" and "Well we love each other, so what could go wrong?" It's when you veer too far in either direction that problems happen.

And your assertion that happiness is fleeting and therefore not so important, is a problem. Because every person gets a mixed back of happy stuff and not-so-happy stuff to deal with in life. Someone like me could say that "My troubles are fleeting," in much the same way. If you go through your life with a focus on negative things, which is easy to do and many do, then those things dominate your reality and your interactions with others.

Let's go back to "The One" concept. In saying it is a fantasy and something that no one can live up to, you're disregarding the concept of subjective reality, which I think is part of the issue here. A scientific and technical mind does want things to be objectively true or false, the same no matter who is perceiving them. A measured value being the same no matter who is measuring it. But here's why this approach fails in dating: Subjectivity. Which RULES everything about dating. People have varying priorities and tastes. So the man I chose, who is "The One" is only such to me. But since I'm the one with him, that's perfect. My mom thinks he's an old perv (to which I tell her, so what, I'm also a perv--only semi-jokingly) and many of my friends don't understand why I wouldn't choose the wealthier man or the better looking man or what have you. They can have their own priorities, but they only get to apply them to their own love lives, because I'm not about to care or make choices based on other people's taste!

So whenever a woman says, in the future, "The One" I would ask that instead of seeking to debunk and mansplain to her why this is not realistic or logical....translate those words in your mind to her saying, "My One" instead. Which means he need not be some ideal of objective perfection, nor a fantasy, merely to possess whatever qualities she has deemed important to her satisfaction with a mate. Each of us will have a different set of XYZ that we hope to find, if we are self aware to know what we need. And NO ONE is in a position to tell us that those criteria should be compromised or don't hold merit.
 
Old 07-03-2018, 12:57 PM
RJ_
 
743 posts, read 392,538 times
Reputation: 814
When I used the term The One, I'm referring to a preconceived ideal or image of someone. What you're talking about isn't The One, you're talking about finding a person who you want to stick around with and who wants to stick around with you. You've made assessments, you've weighed the pros and cons and decided there's sufficient compatibility to form a long term relationship.

I had to google "mansplain." A ridiculous term. I invite you to show me one instance of me mansplaining. Assigning gender characteristics to a particular person's set of linguistics is absurd.
 
Old 07-03-2018, 01:02 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,962,945 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ_ View Post
I had to google "mansplain." A ridiculous term. I invite you to show me one instance of me mansplaining. Assigning gender characteristics to a particular person's set of linguistics is absurd.



 
Old 07-03-2018, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
20,393 posts, read 14,661,936 times
Reputation: 39487
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ_ View Post
When I used the term The One, I'm referring to a preconceived ideal or image of someone. What you're talking about isn't The One, you're talking about finding a person who you want to stick around with and who wants to stick around with you. You've made assessments, you've weighed the pros and cons and decided there's sufficient compatibility to form a long term relationship.

I had to google "mansplain." A ridiculous term. I invite you to show me one instance of me mansplaining. Assigning gender characteristics to a particular person's set of linguistics is absurd.
This has now become a comedy routine. Congratulations. Please let me know when the Netflix special comes out, I want to make sure I see it.
 
Old 07-03-2018, 01:14 PM
RJ_
 
743 posts, read 392,538 times
Reputation: 814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic_Spork View Post
This has now become a comedy routine. Congratulations. Please let me know when the Netflix special comes out, I want to make sure I see it.
A typical response when one knows they're wrong and has no intelligent rebuttal. But, I'm fairly certain that we've discussed this topic to it's conclusion.
 
Old 07-03-2018, 01:17 PM
 
Location: South Bay Native
16,225 posts, read 27,431,396 times
Reputation: 31495
Syntax error, Will Robinson

Does not compute

Does not compute

Does not compute

D-D-D-D

--------------
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top