Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's just so...unoriginal. I would rather have a girl entirely covered than one with a butterfly or something lame on the small of the back. Chicks with sleeves are...oddly hot.
It's just so...unoriginal. I would rather have a girl entirely covered than one with a butterfly or something lame on the small of the back. Chicks with sleeves are...oddly hot.
Is that someone with an entire arm covered? Now that is a person who can commit!
I don't even get it why a woman would want a tattoo anywhere. But when a gal has one of them across the lower back (I don't remember if it was harley or butterfly or dragonfly but it was that shape) and wears clothing to the OFFICE that purposely shows off that she has this -- "tramp stamp" (i was unfamiliar with the term too), it seems low-life to me and -- well, 'trampy.'
I don't like them, but I hate tattoos. I wished I like tattoos because so many woman are getting them these days. But I don't, I hate them with a passion. They are too "masculine" and I've always been into girly girls. Woman's bodies are so beautiful, why ruin them with tacky tattoos? *sigh*
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.