Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-15-2010, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,007,791 times
Reputation: 9418

Advertisements

I have a friend who looks like a model, gorgeous, great bone structure, tall, slender, a head of hair to die for, all the right stuff for modeling. But in her photos she looks like Janis Joplin, serious business. You wouldn't believe it was her in the photos. She didn't make it when she tried to become a model because she's not photogenic.

I'm curious, does anyone ever take this into account when they look at photos of people on dating sites? A lot of people are unphotogenic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-15-2010, 08:05 AM
 
5,143 posts, read 5,407,619 times
Reputation: 2865
I'm not. I don't like having photos taken of me cuz the flash can give me a migraine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2010, 08:05 AM
 
37,617 posts, read 46,006,789 times
Reputation: 57204
If a person is attractive, then they shouldn't have a problem getting a decent picture. I think it's important to make an effort to get pictures made that reflect what you truly look like. I don't get how someone can NOT look like what the camera captures. I always expect that a person on an online dating site will have accurately represented themselves there, and I state that in my profile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2010, 08:12 AM
 
5,143 posts, read 5,407,619 times
Reputation: 2865
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChessieMom View Post
If a person is attractive, then they shouldn't have a problem getting a decent picture. I think it's important to make an effort to get pictures made that reflect what you truly look like. I don't get how someone can NOT look like what the camera captures. I always expect that a person on an online dating site will have accurately represented themselves there, and I state that in my profile.
I don't think a 2D snapshot, represents our 4D world. I NEVER think pictures look like the people they represent. Including my family. I usually take pictures of settings or events. Not a fan of pictures of people. I use a Video Camera to capture people.

But then again I'm like 1/16th Sioux or something...and I've heard that Native Americans don't like pictures either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2010, 08:15 AM
 
37,617 posts, read 46,006,789 times
Reputation: 57204
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSizzle225 View Post
I don't think a 2D snapshot, represents our 4D world.
You don't need to represent a 4D world on your dating profile. All you need is a few (read - MORE THAN ONE) decent pictures. It's not difficult to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2010, 08:17 AM
 
5,143 posts, read 5,407,619 times
Reputation: 2865
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChessieMom View Post
You don't need to represent a 4D world on your dating profile. All you need is a few (read - MORE THAN ONE) decent pictures. It's not difficult to do.
Oh. But the question was does anybody take into account that people aren't photogenic. I WOULD but I don't really online date. To me pictures look soul less...unless I took the picture and can remember back to what was going on in the picture. Pictures, to me are sentimental. I can't really look at a bunch of pictures and decide who I want to date on that. That's me and I'm different.


And why wouldn't you want to represent your world in your profile?? I don't understand that. And 4D means, X,Y,Z axis and time....just in case you were wondering WTH I'm talking about. If somebody could capture themself traveling through a worm hole, I'd DEFINITELY want to talk to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2010, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,007,791 times
Reputation: 9418
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChessieMom View Post
If a person is attractive, then they shouldn't have a problem getting a decent picture. I think it's important to make an effort to get pictures made that reflect what you truly look like. I don't get how someone can NOT look like what the camera captures. I always expect that a person on an online dating site will have accurately represented themselves there, and I state that in my profile.
Have you ever heard of the slow-thinking fan tell one of their idols they look better in person? Ok, bad example but I can't show you photos of people who just don't look good in photos. I think my friend is one of the extreme cases but even milder ones can repel someone. It's not so hard to believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2010, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,007,791 times
Reputation: 9418
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSizzle225 View Post
Oh. But the question was does anybody take into account that people aren't photogenic. I WOULD but I don't really online date. To me pictures look soul less...unless I took the picture and can remember back to what was going on in the picture. Pictures, to me are sentimental. I can't really look at a bunch of pictures and decide who I want to date on that. That's me and I'm different.
Exactly. Because people are so hung up on it, it's pretty important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2010, 08:24 AM
 
4,897 posts, read 18,493,158 times
Reputation: 3885
i feel there ARE people who are not photogenic! the camera just does not capture them in a good way.
then i have met people who look great in pics and not so hot in real life. its amazing.

so something to beware of on dating sites also--lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2010, 08:28 AM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
yes i assume all and any unappealing info or conflicting info- has to do with my lack of insight and that it is in fact a terrible misunderstanding.
btw, did i tell you bout my eharmony blond cutie that i jetted to nashville to meet? there she was standing in the parking lot, quasimoto.
(u think i make this stuff up dontcha) ps did you know that 40% of eharmony users (in an anonymous survey--) admitted to being married??????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top