Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-22-2015, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Columbia SC
14,254 posts, read 14,762,425 times
Reputation: 22199

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess44 View Post
Not sure if I made the right choice been a few months in South Carolina
I retired to SC from MA and I love it. What are your issues?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2015, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Crowderado
51 posts, read 48,518 times
Reputation: 150
I was pretty happy, for a while, but despite the many wonderful things here in the Denver metro area (relatively dry, warm climate; great scenery; plethora of Open Space parks; etc.), I find myself increasingly longing for a return to my Midwestern roots. Maybe not exactly where I'm from (NW Ohio), but someplace that isn't a boom town. A place or region that is still mostly rural - more fields and woods than shopping malls - and where there are some open spaces (public land) and trails for hiking, running, and Nordic (cross-country) skiing (I feel the need to explain the term "Nordic" because so many folks here seem to think it means "Alpine"). Unlike most retirees, the idea of cold and snow doesn't bother me (I'm a skier). In fact, I long to live in a place with a local system of groomed Nordic ski trails and an active, friendly local Nordic ski community.

Yes, it does snow here in the Front Range area, but it comes in small amounts - usually only 2 or 3 inches of light, fluffy stuff - and the wind blows it away the next day. What the wind doesn't scour away, the sun takes care of. No local, groomed trails. Yes, there are indeed a whole bunch of Nordic ski areas over on the other side of the Divide, but the price you pay to get to them (sitting in the I-70 traffic jam/parking lot for hours and hours) isn't my cup of tea any more.

Now that career considerations are a thing of the past, I think it's time to live the "authentic life" that Dr. Bernie Siegel speaks of. And I can only envision that life in someplace more rural and less populated. Towns like Viroqua, WI and Traverse City, MI seem to be the correct prescription(s).

Just my 2 cents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 01:18 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,415,978 times
Reputation: 11042
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
If you're in a part of the country that competes well globally, real estate is doing just fine as long as you live where the top-20% want to live. If you're somewhere that most of the people are at median household income, things aren't so rosy since those people never saw much of a bounce after the Great Recession. Globalization has caused a huge amount of income stratification and that trend is only going to increase. If we were talking Japan, then yeah. It looks bleak since they're seeing enormous population contraction. Northern Europe has the same issue though not quite to the same extreme. The US population continues to grow. The US economy continues to grow. Towns with mostly dual income college educated households are not going to have a downward slide. Working class towns are going to really struggle.
The US population will not grow forever. What's happened in Japan and Europe will eventually hit here. My own bet is it will start to hit about 10 years from now. Initially there will be a flattening and later outright decline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2015, 02:44 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,294,526 times
Reputation: 40261
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayAreaHillbilly View Post
The US population will not grow forever. What's happened in Japan and Europe will eventually hit here. My own bet is it will start to hit about 10 years from now. Initially there will be a flattening and later outright decline.


So you're representing pure conjecture as fact. I hate to burst your bubble but the census bureau thinks otherwise. They project a population growth rate of 0.82% this year. It is still projected at 0.46% growth rate in 2060. We will add almost 100 million people. 2060 in Japan projects to be a total disaster. They project to shrink from 130 million down to 86 million in 2060 and that 40% of the Japanese population will be over the age of 60.

Don't believe me? Here is the citation from the US Census Bureau. Click on Table 1 for the data.
2014 National Population Projections: Summary Tables - People and Households - U.S. Census Bureau
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2015, 02:56 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,709,611 times
Reputation: 23268
I would not mind retiring in place if I had been able to buy my forever property nearby...

The way home prices have escalated... up 50% in the last 3 years... looks like I might be in my forever home...

As it looks now... my options are stay in the SF Bay Area, Western Washington or Salzburg Austria...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2015, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Eastern Washington
17,218 posts, read 57,118,560 times
Reputation: 18588
I think we are getting two different approaches here - one is people who live somewhere they don't really like that much, but were there for a job or whatever, and are thinking about "settling" for retirement in that location just for simplicity and to avoid a move.

The other approach is what I have done, I live in a place I like, and am still working. I intend to stay put in order to "not try to fix what ain't broke" so to speak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2015, 04:33 PM
 
4,063 posts, read 2,143,873 times
Reputation: 11030
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 Mitch View Post
I think we are getting two different approaches here - one is people who live somewhere they don't really like that much, but were there for a job or whatever, and are thinking about "settling" for retirement in that location just for simplicity and to avoid a move.

The other approach is what I have done, I live in a place I like, and am still working. I intend to stay put in order to "not try to fix what ain't broke" so to speak.
That's how I am, Mitch, and what made me post this to begin with. It just seemed to me sad and impossible that everyone working would rather be somewhere else (I can see the wanting to be somewhere else than the workplace, of course, but not the general area). I do feel that any move would be a trade-off. There would be some things that would be better than where I live now and others that would be worse. For example, I could escape traffic by moving somewhere else, but there may not be much to do, so less populated roads wouldn't really matter!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2015, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,548,114 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Klister View Post
I was pretty happy, for a while, but despite the many wonderful things here in the Denver metro area (relatively dry, warm climate; great scenery; plethora of Open Space parks; etc.), I find myself increasingly longing for a return to my Midwestern roots. Maybe not exactly where I'm from (NW Ohio), but someplace that isn't a boom town. A place or region that is still mostly rural - more fields and woods than shopping malls - and where there are some open spaces (public land) and trails for hiking, running, and Nordic (cross-country) skiing (I feel the need to explain the term "Nordic" because so many folks here seem to think it means "Alpine"). Unlike most retirees, the idea of cold and snow doesn't bother me (I'm a skier). In fact, I long to live in a place with a local system of groomed Nordic ski trails and an active, friendly local Nordic ski community.

Yes, it does snow here in the Front Range area, but it comes in small amounts - usually only 2 or 3 inches of light, fluffy stuff - and the wind blows it away the next day. What the wind doesn't scour away, the sun takes care of. No local, groomed trails. Yes, there are indeed a whole bunch of Nordic ski areas over on the other side of the Divide, but the price you pay to get to them (sitting in the I-70 traffic jam/parking lot for hours and hours) isn't my cup of tea any more.

Now that career considerations are a thing of the past, I think it's time to live the "authentic life" that Dr. Bernie Siegel speaks of. And I can only envision that life in someplace more rural and less populated. Towns like Viroqua, WI and Traverse City, MI seem to be the correct prescription(s).

Just my 2 cents.
Then go off and live your dream while you are still young.

I retired and did the rural thing. I have 45 acres, donkeys, cows, chickens, vegetable garden.
I made wild plum jam for the first time and have a freezer full of beef from a steer I knew personally.
Of course everyone thought I was crazy. I don't plan to stay here forever though. I'll move to a small beach town for my next "retirement". But for now I'm enjoying the good life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2015, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,917,781 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzcat22 View Post
................ I could escape traffic by moving somewhere else, but there may not be much to do, so less populated roads wouldn't really matter!
The above statement is a simple truth which I find profound at the same time. I can relate to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2015, 08:19 PM
 
4,063 posts, read 2,143,873 times
Reputation: 11030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
The above statement is a simple truth which I find profound at the same time. I can relate to it.
I'll bet you do, living in LA! And really, how could it be otherwise? The places that appeal to lots of people (because they have the sort of things that appeal to lots of people) will attract more people and thus more traffic. I suppose if someone figured out some really ingenuous way to move people around and house people, perhaps then traffic, congestion, limited housing options, etc. wouldn't play as prominent a role. But that won't happen in my lifetime, so I will just make the best of the negatives while enjoying the positives. The traffic situation actually helps him maintain some balance in my life----I avoid a lot of driving during rush hours, which helps me not attempt to partake in every concert, lecture, play, festival, etc. that's going on---and then on the weekends when things are better, I enjoy them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top