Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-10-2016, 09:41 PM
 
24,565 posts, read 18,314,501 times
Reputation: 40266

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
That's great. Sometimes life derails plans though, and of course in those situations all you can do is adjust. There are many people though that walk through life without giving the future much thought, and others who over plan while smothering years when they could be enjoying them more. It's tough.
Sure. That's why I have contingency plans. I was unemployed for 14 1/2 months at the Great Recession. I figured out how to live on a $425/week unemployment check and maintain a pretty high quality of life. When your housing is paid for and you have no debt, that becomes possible. That was a very useful learning activity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2016, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Northern Wisconsin
10,379 posts, read 10,932,513 times
Reputation: 18713
Since getting close to retirement, my wife and I have completely rethought our spending habits. Cleaning out in preparation really made us think. We found that we had purchased all kinds of things that we really didn't need or use. So we have trimmed our expenses tremendously. Trust me, you can live on a lot less than you think if you just reexamine your spending. Do your really need a NEW car. Do you need that big a house? How many times are you eating out in a week? How many pets do you have and how much do they cost? Cell phone bill? Do you need all those channels and cable movies too? Rethink your spending and you'll find out that you don't need as much as you think you do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2016, 10:31 PM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,835 posts, read 14,950,380 times
Reputation: 16587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
I don't see that as a "big problem". Living on Social Security is very doable, provided one isn't trying to do it in a place such as New York City. Sure, frugality is required, and frequent eating out will not be possible, etc. I don't see that as a big problem. Sure, it my loom as a big problem personally to those who have been living high on the hog and now have to make painful adjustments, but that does not constitute a societal problem. In that case, all the previous high on the hog living is part of the problem.

The assumptions we make color our perception of the situation. If we posit the average SS monthly benefit amount of about $1,300, then yes, that is a big problem. But the average is skewed considerably to the low side by people who do not have a full work history under SS, such as me with my monthly $165 SS benefit. Most of my work history was not under SS and I am doing just fine at age 72. A person with a 35-year SS work history will get something on the order of $2,000 or more, and if there is a spouse who also worked, then that is icing on the cake.
While we did save for a variety of reasons we didn't save what we should have so I am working longer to build my social security benefit which goes a long way towards making up for my past sins.

I'm now 68 and if I had retired at my FRA my benefit would have been close to $2,300 but by putting off taking benefits, while continuing to work, my benefit goes up by approximately $196/month for every additional year I work. If I make two more years, and I will even if I have to take money out of our retirement savings, my benefit alone will be close to $3,100 while my wife receives $1,150 giving us a combined monthly social security benefit of $4,250 alone. After all the medicare and supplement cost ($560/month) we'd still be at $3,690 social security alone.

That's $44,280/year after deducting all medical and we will not be paying any federal or state income taxes on any of that money.

While we have some additional income I know we could live very comfortably on our social security alone which was made possible by working just four more years.

Another way I look at it is what is the value of not collecting for four years? For the four years our benefit will increase by about $784 which is equivalent to having an additional $235,200 in savings if you figure withdrawals over 25 years. So by working not only did I earn money but it is exactly as if I earned my paycheck and was able to save $58,800 in after tax money for each of those four years. Ok, I worked to 70 but even if you figured withdrawals over 20 years it is still a lot of money.

According to social security for 2016 the average aged Couple, Both Receiving Benefits, is $2,212 but nearly half the population starts collecting at age 62 while working an extra 8 years would go a long way towards nearly double it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2016, 03:04 AM
 
106,823 posts, read 109,073,990 times
Reputation: 80251
Working longer is the silver bullet for those with an underfunded retirement if they can and want to .

It can be worth as much as an extra 800k in savings.

Your ss check is 69% bigger plus colas

You are not spending down assets

You are still growing the assets you are not spending

You can still add to a 401k or ira

You have 8 years less of life to support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2016, 05:31 AM
 
Location: Lake Norman, NC
8,877 posts, read 13,927,965 times
Reputation: 35986
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
Working longer is the silver bullet for those with an underfunded retirement if they can and want to .

It can be worth as much as an extra 800k in savings.

Your ss check is 69% bigger plus colas

You are not spending down assets

You are still growing the assets you are not spending

You can still add to a 401k or ira

You have 8 years less of life to support.
Yep! Your points above entered my thought process when I concluded that working the five years between early retirement and FRA is going to be in my best interests.

But, my day will come! Hopefully good health and continued employment provide me with work till FRA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2016, 05:46 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,078,019 times
Reputation: 14434
It isn't just your age 65-75 lifestyle and needs to focus on but also your ages 75-90 and beyond. What level of comfort, health and lifestyle support do you want and need. It can come at a steep price and differences between having and not having can be considerable. Especially if you could have had more/better and didn't do what you could have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2016, 05:50 AM
 
4,726 posts, read 4,432,782 times
Reputation: 8481
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
Sure, but a household net worth of $1 million at age 65 is about 85th percentile. 70th percentile household net worth at age 65 is maybe $350K to $400K and much of that net worth for most is home equity.

$30K in Social Security and $40K in retirement savings draw down is certainly doable. It's a top-25% retirement.
Thank you--- I think after reading more of this thread in particular ( I do read most of the threads on this forum) we all can agree the real wild card other than health costs- is our health/ lifespan.
Such a balancing act.
I do feel a bit better about this, but being 63 (well next month) with a retired spouse who is not yet drawing soc sec, there is a finality to leaving employment. That thought of no more paychecks is just too scary for me now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2016, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,835 posts, read 14,950,380 times
Reputation: 16587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayvenne View Post
Thank you--- I think after reading more of this thread in particular ( I do read most of the threads on this forum) we all can agree the real wild card other than health costs- is our health/ lifespan.
Such a balancing act.
I do feel a bit better about this, but being 63 (well next month) with a retired spouse who is not yet drawing soc sec, there is a finality to leaving employment. That thought of no more paychecks is just too scary for me now.
I feel like a real happy camper right now because if I had to retire today we'd be just fine so now all I am working for is the "extras".

While not unique I know if I work until 70 between my our combined ss benefit, along with two smallish pensions, I will actually receive a "raise" in take home income the day I retire. It won't be much, a little less than $100/month, but it is still a "raise" which makes financial planning pretty much breeze.

Knowing you have the capability to retire at any minute brings tranquility to life as is knowing I am in charge of my future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2016, 07:04 AM
 
106,823 posts, read 109,073,990 times
Reputation: 80251
I always found working much more enjoyable when i am doing it because i want to vs have to
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2016, 07:12 AM
 
11,558 posts, read 12,066,929 times
Reputation: 17758
You'll need a boatload of moola if you want to own several homes and cars, travel every year, go out to dinner a lot, plus whatever outside interests you have that cost money.

If you are not materialistic, aren't into traveling, are content where you are and don't feel as though you're sacrificing your 'happiness' by not having a lot of money to spend, then you won't need as much as those who required those things to find their happiness.

No one can tell you the dollar amount you need.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top