Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And people are also not lying about the slumlords on here.
Tell us who are the slumlords on this forum? Verified by what facts? Your guess? Because it's the only reason a tiny intellect can come up with why anyone would possibly have friends who live in the "slums" or "ghettos"? These lies are what you do to make yourself feel superior. Pathetic.
What about this particular JUMP bike tells you that it absolutely must have been stolen?
A kid is riding it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IslandOwen86
I know that JUMP service had been suspended in Providence at one point due to issues with vandalism and theft of the bikes, so are you saying that any JUMP bike seen on the streets of Providence should simply be assumed to have been stolen?
No, not any JUMP bike. But if you see a kid riding a JUMP bike, yes, you should assume it's stolen.
And people are also not lying about the slumlords on here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by independent man
Tell us who are the slumlords on this forum? Verified by what facts? Your guess? Because it's the only reason a tiny intellect can come up with why anyone would possibly have friends who live in the "slums" or "ghettos"? These lies are what you do to make yourself feel superior. Pathetic.
And do you think it may have been someone who bought in South Providence?
People are not lying. You've barely scratched the surface of this rabbit hole.
A true expert should be able to both support their argument with evidence and be clear and direct about what they're saying. You do neither. So, if you're an expert, just be direct and tell us - who changed the Wiki and how do you know they did it?
Yes, you flat out lied (and continue to lie) about me looking for a home in Elmwood. This is the conversation. Again, if it truly wasn't a lie, it was at least a mistake based on abysmal comprehension. To any reasonable person, there's absolutely nothing in there even remotely implying that I was "obviously looking." If there was, you would have cited it a long time ago. So, was it a lie or just a mistake? There answer isn't "neither."
Quote:
Originally Posted by redplum33
And people are also not lying about the slumlords on here.
According to you, you've never accused anyone of being a slumlord (even though you definitely have). So which is it? Have you never accused anyone of being a slumlord, or were you "not lying" when you very clearly indicated that Independent Man is a slumlord? Again, there's no way the answer is "neither."
Again, yes tenants are not friends. Who has tenants? One who has tenants is a landlord. Please tell us without lying. Who is a landlord? And, by what proof? Name names. We're waiting.
Again, yes tenants are not friends. Who has tenants? One who has tenants is a landlord. Please tell us without lying. Who is a landlord? And, by what proof? Name names. We're waiting.
Our friends dance around the point they're trying to make because they're very afraid that they'll get in trouble for violating the CD terms of service. That's why plum has totally never called you a slumlord. However, lots of people are landlords. It's not an insult or personal attack to say that someone is a landlord. So since there's no violation of the terms of service, I'm sure our "expert" will have no problem pointing out who the landlord(s) is/are (and sharing the proof of how they know this).
I believe calling someone a liar is considered a personal attack.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.