Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-28-2016, 03:36 PM
 
Location: Sequoia Heights, Oakland, CA
406 posts, read 288,982 times
Reputation: 416

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatCurve View Post
As far as we know, until proven otherwise. The RNC head Reince Priebus has always stated that the RNC was not taking sides.
The DNC email exchanges (in question) occurred in late April though May. Why did they occur? The emails seem to reflect the growing frustration with Sanders rather than corruption. How? Hillary secured an insurmountable lead by mid March, and the emails (in question) coincide with Sander's refusal to concede the nomination (despite pressure from Democrats); the party's desire to shift gears towards the general election; campaign allegations; threats; and the Nevada incident. What's the problem? Schultz is expected to be officially neutral during the nomination process, - and did not appear so - because the emails transpired before the nomination process was concluded, two days ago

Last edited by the happy guy; 07-28-2016 at 04:01 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-28-2016, 04:05 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,923,863 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick5575 View Post
not everyone is a left wing zombie
Sounds like the premise of an entertaining movie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth
677 posts, read 836,236 times
Reputation: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleysOwl View Post
Thinking up ideas and tossing them around is not a conspiracy by any definition. The only thing you have proved is you have anexcitable nature that will desperately grasp at random straws to claim they constitute a haystack. But they did do something wrong ethically by abandoning the DNC mandate of impartiality. That's what the apology was rightly issued to acknowledge. The GOP and RNC by contrast have entirely abandoned all conservative foundations to support a maniac who shares none of their values. And for which they offer no apology to genuine conservatives.
Yes, that is the definition of a "conspiracy":

con·spir·a·cy
kənˈspirəsē/
noun
noun: conspiracy; plural noun: conspiracies
  1. a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
    "a conspiracy to destroy the government"
    synonyms:plot, scheme, plan, machination, ploy, trick, ruse, subterfuge; informalracket
    "a conspiracy to manipulate the results"
The DNC was collaborating to find ways to hurt Sander's campaign. That is most definitely a conspiracy by any definition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Sequoia Heights, Oakland, CA
406 posts, read 288,982 times
Reputation: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by zitsky View Post
I love it when Trump asks the Russians to hack the DNC computers, or turn over what they know. Great foreign policy right there.
Right. They were up in arms about risks to national security regarding emails, but when Trump invites Russian hackers to violate national security, it's all good.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/29/wo...l-hacking.html

Last edited by the happy guy; 07-28-2016 at 04:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, Orange County CA
9,807 posts, read 11,164,225 times
Reputation: 7997
What happened to discussing:

Eww; and
Peter Thiel?

I am still waiting for the OP to explain why Peter Thiel being a Republican is such a 'contradiction'. I wait to be informed on many levels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 05:36 PM
 
911 posts, read 592,248 times
Reputation: 561
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatCurve View Post
Yes, that is the definition of a "conspiracy":

The DNC was collaborating to find ways to hurt Sander's campaign. That is most definitely a conspiracy by any definition.
There was no plan. There was no collaboration. By any definition. As pointed out to you before negative PR campaigns are undertaken by businesses and organizations in all kinds of fields every day and they are not prosecuted as "conspiracies", let alone random conversations by people bouncing "what ifs" off each other. perhaps joining the Alex Jones fan club can fulfill your desire to have a pet conspiracy of your very own
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 05:39 PM
 
911 posts, read 592,248 times
Reputation: 561
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvSouthOC View Post
What happened to discussing:

Eww; and
Peter Thiel?

I am still waiting for the OP to explain why Peter Thiel being a Republican is such a 'contradiction'. I wait to be informed on many levels.
Does this seem Republican to you.

Quote:
"In 2009, Thiel published a now infamous essay on a website of the Cato Institute, in which he said “I no longer believe that [economic] freedom and democracy are compatible.” In the essay, Thiel presents three technological opportunities to “escape” civil society: Seasteading, outer space exploration and “cyberspace.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 11:01 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth
677 posts, read 836,236 times
Reputation: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleysOwl View Post
There was no plan. There was no collaboration. By any definition. As pointed out to you before negative PR campaigns are undertaken by businesses and organizations in all kinds of fields every day and they are not prosecuted as "conspiracies", let alone random conversations by people bouncing "what ifs" off each other. perhaps joining the Alex Jones fan club can fulfill your desire to have a pet conspiracy of your very own
Um...when you conspire with other people over e-mail to sabotage someone, it is a conspiracy.

Heck, even the ultra-liberal New York Times called it a conspiracy:

"Democrats arrived at their nominating convention on Sunday under a cloud of discord as Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, abruptly said she was resigning after a trove of leaked emails showed party officials conspiring to sabotage the campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us...ks-emails.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 11:24 PM
 
911 posts, read 592,248 times
Reputation: 561
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatCurve View Post
Um...when you conspire with other people over e-mail to sabotage someone, it is a conspiracy.

Heck, even the ultra-liberal New York Times called it a conspiracy:

"Democrats arrived at their nominating convention on Sunday under a cloud of discord as Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, abruptly said she was resigning after a trove of leaked emails showed party officials conspiring to sabotage the campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us...ks-emails.html
You previously posted the dictionary definition of conspiracy. It was defined as a "plan". Show us evidence of a "plan" that could be put into action not just loose words and what ifs. While you are at it please explain how every negative PR effort in the world are "conspiracies" yet never prosecuted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2016, 02:25 AM
 
Location: Planet Earth
677 posts, read 836,236 times
Reputation: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleysOwl View Post
You previously posted the dictionary definition of conspiracy. It was defined as a "plan". Show us evidence of a "plan" that could be put into action not just loose words and what ifs. While you are at it please explain how every negative PR effort in the world are "conspiracies" yet never prosecuted.
Did you not see that "collusion" and "collaboration" are synonyms for "conspiracy"?

And, yes, if two or more people conspire a negative PR effort then by definition, it is a conspiracy.

And haven't you noticed? The DNC has been prosecuted in the eyes of the public. Why do you think Wasserman-Schultz was forced to resign immediately?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top