Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Self-Sufficiency and Preparedness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2018, 04:27 PM
 
Location: SE corner of the Ozark Redoubt
9,034 posts, read 4,725,418 times
Reputation: 9291

Advertisements

Quote:
Common law is a subset of civil cases. Civil forfeiture is not common law. Administrative hearings are not common law.
In addition, please show me a Supreme Court ruling incorporating the 7th Amendment to the states. Hint: There is none.
Is that what they are teaching in law school today?
If it is, then it is of no wonder people today do not know
their rights, since that would mean that law schools
are teaching officers of the court incorrectly.
(Which is no surprise to me.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2018, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,250,053 times
Reputation: 16767
Senate Report 93-549
https://archive.org/stream/senate-re...3-549_djvu.txt
War and Emergency Powers Acts
"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years (as of the report 1933-1973), freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency."
FREEDOMS ... GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION ... HAVE BEEN ABRIDGED BY LAWS ... UNDER EMERGENCY RULE ...

Constitutional U.S.A. (1789 - 1933) R.I.P.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2018, 12:37 AM
 
725 posts, read 807,248 times
Reputation: 1697
This is why jury nullification and serving on juries is the most important thing you can do. If you don’t agree with a politician’s law, judges’ law (case law) or how it is interpreted or applied (possible punishments) vote it down by voting a person not guilty. If someone defends him or herself against abuse of their fundamental rights to body and property and against the ones abusing them, vote not guilty.

The biggest problem is not the politicians who utter words but cops and government agents who use physical force and violence to enforce the words of others. Cops are not heroes or the good guys when they are the ones turning words of politicians into actions. Blindly following orders is not an excuse. Cops should be held completely responsible for their actions. If they were they would not be enforcing laws that violate fundamental freedoms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2018, 07:54 AM
 
Location: SE corner of the Ozark Redoubt
9,034 posts, read 4,725,418 times
Reputation: 9291
Quote:
Originally Posted by john620 View Post
This is why jury nullification and serving on juries is the most important thing you can do. If you don’t agree with a politician’s law, judges’ law (case law) or how it is interpreted or applied (possible punishments) vote it down by voting a person not guilty. If someone defends him or herself against abuse of their fundamental rights to body and property and against the ones abusing them, vote not guilty.

The biggest problem is not the politicians who utter words but cops and government agents who use physical force and violence to enforce the words of others. Cops are not heroes or the good guys when they are the ones turning words of politicians into actions. Blindly following orders is not an excuse. Cops should be held completely responsible for their actions. If they were they would not be enforcing laws that violate fundamental freedoms.
Yes, the last defense in our nation is the people (collectively, not individually, as "sovereign citizens" would preach) withholding their consent to be governed. We saw it used several times as a deterrent to tyranny under the Obama administration, and now it is being used against lawful administration of our current government. This shows that it is a double edged sword, as it can do almost as much damage as good, but that is the last line of defense.

(Note: the most obvious examples in the fight against tyranny were the Bundy Ranch stand off and the Burns Oregon Standoff, and the court case acquittals that ensued afterwards, but there were dozens of lesser known cases.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Self-Sufficiency and Preparedness
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top