Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Toyota, Lexus, and Scion
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-18-2011, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Middleton, Wisconsin
4,229 posts, read 17,643,035 times
Reputation: 2315

Advertisements

I've done quite a bit of driving and riding in Venza. Mom owns one, She has the two wheel drive four cylinder. It's peppy, she averages close to 29 mpg average. It's roomy for long hauls and has nice tight steering. The ride on hers is a bit stiff but it's also more of the base model. It's still a nice looking ride. I have a Camry and I've had nothing but luck with my Toyota hers has been great as well. It's a 2009 by the way.


Good luck in your search.


Josh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-19-2011, 08:50 AM
 
Location: South Jersey
7,780 posts, read 21,927,057 times
Reputation: 2356
I would compare the Outback to the Rav4.. The Venza is larger and Sube does not really have an equivalent I would say
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2011, 09:10 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,807,027 times
Reputation: 14622
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankgn87 View Post
I would compare the Outback to the Rav4.. The Venza is larger and Sube does not really have an equivalent I would say
As long as we are talking 2010+ models, the Outback and Venza are nearly identical in size, pricing and options. The Outback with seats folded has a max cargo area of 71.3 cubic feet. The Venza rings in at 70.1. Front passenger volume is pretty similar as well, with the Venza getting the slight edge. The model comparison sort of breaks down like this size/price wise:

Forester = Rav4/4Runner
Outback = Venza
Tribeca = Highlander
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2011, 12:17 PM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,725,634 times
Reputation: 7738
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
As long as we are talking 2010+ models, the Outback and Venza are nearly identical in size, pricing and options. The Outback with seats folded has a max cargo area of 71.3 cubic feet. The Venza rings in at 70.1. Front passenger volume is pretty similar as well, with the Venza getting the slight edge. The model comparison sort of breaks down like this size/price wise:

Forester = Rav4/4Runner
Outback = Venza
Tribeca = Highlander
The problem with the cargo area dimensions of the Venza is a lot of space is up high and isn't really usable. Especially with the seats up, the Venza is terrible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2011, 05:26 AM
 
Location: South Jersey
7,780 posts, read 21,927,057 times
Reputation: 2356
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
As long as we are talking 2010+ models, the Outback and Venza are nearly identical in size, pricing and options. The Outback with seats folded has a max cargo area of 71.3 cubic feet. The Venza rings in at 70.1. Front passenger volume is pretty similar as well, with the Venza getting the slight edge. The model comparison sort of breaks down like this size/price wise:

Forester = Rav4/4Runner
Outback = Venza
Tribeca = Highlander
yea I guess you are right. The Venza just seems larger to me. Have not really looked at either car real close
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2011, 10:40 AM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,725,634 times
Reputation: 7738
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankgn87 View Post
yea I guess you are right. The Venza just seems larger to me. Have not really looked at either car real close
It's a big fat car with not a lot to show for it.

I find the same with toyota SUV's, they are big but the cockpit is always squashed. I'm 5 ft 9 in. and my head is on the ceiling of any 4 runner or land cruiser.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2011, 10:48 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,807,027 times
Reputation: 14622
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankgn87 View Post
yea I guess you are right. The Venza just seems larger to me. Have not really looked at either car real close
I didn't realize how close they were in size either until I saw them side-by-side. The 2009 and older Outback was a lot smaller, than the current 2010 model.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2011, 10:49 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,807,027 times
Reputation: 14622
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanneroo View Post
It's a big fat car with not a lot to show for it.

I find the same with toyota SUV's, they are big but the cockpit is always squashed. I'm 5 ft 9 in. and my head is on the ceiling of any 4 runner or land cruiser.
Interesting observation, I've always thought the same thing. The Toyota SUV's are a lot of car on the outside, not as much on the inside. The one that sticks out the most to me in that regard is the Highlander.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2011, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Birmingham
11,787 posts, read 17,841,782 times
Reputation: 10130
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanneroo View Post
It's a big fat car with not a lot to show for it.

I find the same with toyota SUV's, they are big but the cockpit is always squashed. I'm 5 ft 9 in. and my head is on the ceiling of any 4 runner or land cruiser.
Those two models (4 runner and land/fj cruiser) are built with off road prowess in mind. The will have high floors and long suspension travel so they can clear rocks and have better approach and departure angles.

The Venza and Highlander are car based crossovers and should be built with lower floors and have more room so they have no excuse if they feel cramped on the inside too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2011, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,039 posts, read 16,911,904 times
Reputation: 12951
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
Interesting observation, I've always thought the same thing. The Toyota SUV's are a lot of car on the outside, not as much on the inside. The one that sticks out the most to me in that regard is the Highlander.
I dunno, I'm 6'2 and weight 200+ lbs, I fit just fine behind the wheel of a Venza. And on that tip, I thought the interior was wicked nice:

http://images.usedcheapcars.org/used-toyota/2009-toyota-venza-v6/2009_toyota_venza_11-ucc.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Toyota, Lexus, and Scion
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top