Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-17-2010, 02:14 PM
 
8,862 posts, read 17,490,386 times
Reputation: 2280

Advertisements

I support doing all that needs to be done to stop crime but each and every day it seems that we taking legal knowledge to extremes that are unrealistic.

-Woman in upscale apt shot in the head--not thought to be random--once involved in drug trafficking

--Man returns home to find stepson hanging by a noose in the garage--calls out to neighbors to call 911--LE arrives he tries to enter house--was in an agitated state--punched in the face/head/felony charges/assaulting officers--a small man

--Staff members at local library have to resign --patrons exposing themselves and LE wasn't called

--Waiting in line at MacDonalds--at lunchtime--a woman of one ethnicity attacked another because of a presumed inferred slight--police called --no charges to either

--Mel Gibson, Lindsay Lohan ----Hundreds more.

--Politicians and their personal lives

It all affects the interpretation of the laws by everyone.

I am no saint but I hate to feel I need to be very worried at all times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2010, 02:44 PM
 
3,562 posts, read 5,228,021 times
Reputation: 1861
What does "taking legal knowledge to extremes" mean?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2010, 03:39 PM
 
Location: The New England part of Ohio
24,122 posts, read 32,484,271 times
Reputation: 68363
What does that mean? That we should approach crime with less knowledge than we have?If I am wrong please correct me.
I also fail to see any connection between Lindsay Lohan and Mel Gibson. While the antics of these two are and have been disturbing, they do not constitute true crime.
Gibson is especially despicable, but he has not committed a crime of the magnitude discussed here.
How does this relate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top