Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > U.S. Territories
 [Register]
U.S. Territories Puerto Rico, Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands, etc.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-16-2012, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
7,327 posts, read 12,346,603 times
Reputation: 4814

Advertisements

It seems on many forums that many people (particularly Democrats) are drawing to the conclusion that the Republican Party would try to block statehood for Puerto Rico. However, the official 2012 Republican platform explicitly states that they support statehood for Puerto Rico. The Democratic platform does not explicitly mention support for statehood.

So, why is there this general assumption by many people? I presume it is because the Democrats would gain electoral votes, however, due to the fixed limit of 435 seats in the House of Representatives as stated in the U.S. Constitution, some states will have to lose representatives, and most likely the major blue states will probably be the most affected, thus only giving Democrats a net gain of only 2 electoral votes. I highly doubt the Republican Party would by lying in its official platform.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2012, 11:05 PM
 
12 posts, read 26,596 times
Reputation: 14
Every president since Ronald Reagan has endorsed statehood for PR. But that won't happen without a supermajority of voters accepting that status and US Congress approval.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2012, 08:01 AM
 
529 posts, read 1,087,242 times
Reputation: 493
This argument has been going on for over a century and we still don't seem to get it. Both political parties back statehood ( Republicans " appear" to more so ) but it all comes down to contributions. Once the money is given statehood is forgotten until the next round.

Americans have figured out a long time ago how to loosen up the pocket books of the Fonalledas ( owners of Plaza) and other high contributers to the party's coffers, but when its time to get serious about their commitment, Americans say " surely we back statehood but it's not the right time yet, NEXT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > U.S. Territories
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top