Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-07-2010, 10:23 AM
 
107 posts, read 289,032 times
Reputation: 95

Advertisements

I know this is one thing that Christie wanted to impose, was ending the States current extended benefits law and to only provide EB when it's 100% offset by the federal government? Christie has a taskforce that is sceduled to show their recommendations by 10/1/2010. If they suggest ending the state's current EB law, when would that be imposed? I'm thinking the earliest that could be imposed would be the enxt budget year correct? (july 2011)? I know it also has to get support from the states legislative branch which of course is heavily democratic controlled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-07-2010, 10:36 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
3,814 posts, read 11,984,683 times
Reputation: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristateelectrician View Post
I know this is one thing that Christie wanted to impose, was ending the States current extended benefits law and to only provide EB when it's 100% offset by the federal government? Christie has a taskforce that is sceduled to show their recommendations by 10/1/2010. If they suggest ending the state's current EB law, when would that be imposed? I'm thinking the earliest that could be imposed would be the enxt budget year correct? (july 2011)? I know it also has to get support from the states legislative branch which of course is heavily democratic controlled.
The task force has no power to change the law. That requires a majority of the State Legislature. In New Jersey, that legislature has a strong Democratic majority and is likely to stay that way.

Leaders of both houses of the legislature have said publicly that they will not pass any law reducing the availability of UI benefits -- including changing the funding requirements for EB -- in New Jersey for the foreseeable future, regardless of the recommendations of the task force.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2010, 08:43 PM
 
107 posts, read 289,032 times
Reputation: 95
The word is that next week, the NJ Unemployment Task force will provide their recommendations to Christie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top