Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2010, 09:12 PM
 
1 posts, read 5,010 times
Reputation: 12

Advertisements

Hi, is the former employer notified when you receive a federal extension, such as the tiers? This is in Michigan if that makes a difference. Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2010, 09:15 PM
 
186 posts, read 365,351 times
Reputation: 29
no..they are only notified in the first step of actually getting unemployment to see if you were laid off or let go due to no fault of your own
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 12:50 PM
 
1 posts, read 4,680 times
Reputation: 11
What about when you run out of tiers, are still unemployed, and the unemployment office tells you to file a new claim for benefits? Is your last employer notified then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 02:09 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
3,814 posts, read 11,973,430 times
Reputation: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by donedeal View Post
What about when you run out of tiers, are still unemployed, and the unemployment office tells you to file a new claim for benefits? Is your last employer notified then?
Yes. Each time you file a new claim, UI does contact the former employer on which you are basing that claim to verify your eligibility for basic benefits -- but that's the extent of their involvement.

Former employers contribute only to regular benefits in each state. For that reason, they are contacted when you file a claim to ensure that your termination meets the requirements for basic unemployment benefits. There is no reason to keep former employers aware of your extensions, as they do not contribute to them and are not involved in the determination of your eligibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Ocean County, NJ
621 posts, read 2,325,890 times
Reputation: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by diorgirl View Post
Yes. Each time you file a new claim, UI does contact the former employer on which you are basing that claim to verify your eligibility for basic benefits -- but that's the extent of their involvement.

Former employers contribute only to regular benefits in each state. For that reason, they are contacted when you file a claim to ensure that your termination meets the requirements for basic unemployment benefits. There is no reason to keep former employers aware of your extensions, as they do not contribute to them and are not involved in the determination of your eligibility.
Technically you are right when it comes to the first 26 weeks, but the Federal government has increased and extended the FUTA tax to cover Tier 4 of the EUC program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 03:48 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
3,814 posts, read 11,973,430 times
Reputation: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuck91NYG View Post
Technically you are right when it comes to the first 26 weeks, but the Federal government has increased and extended the FUTA tax to cover Tier 4 of the EUC program.
The Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008 raised the FUTA to 6.2% from 6%. And subsequent legislation has extended that higher rate through 2011.

The same Act that initiated the increase in FUTA also authorized EUC Tiers III and IV -- however, I am unaware of any legislation that designates the allocation of the higher FUTA to fund EUC Tier IV. Do you have a link to this info?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 03:59 PM
 
21 posts, read 104,216 times
Reputation: 22
this is a good question. I have some friends in the department where they could be privy to this information, of which its none of their business or anyone else's but HR or the Payroll guy thats it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Ocean County, NJ
621 posts, read 2,325,890 times
Reputation: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by diorgirl View Post
The Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008 raised the FUTA to 6.2% from 6%. And subsequent legislation has extended that higher rate through 2011.

The same Act that initiated the increase in FUTA also authorized EUC Tiers III and IV -- however, I am unaware of any legislation that designates the allocation of the higher FUTA to fund EUC Tier IV. Do you have a link to this info?
I will get it. they used the extension of the FUTA surtax to offset Tier 4. Tier 4 was deficit neutral when it passed in the fall of 2009
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 05:22 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
3,814 posts, read 11,973,430 times
Reputation: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuck91NYG View Post
I will get it. they used the extension of the FUTA surtax to offset Tier 4. Tier 4 was deficit neutral when it passed in the fall of 2009
Please do. My understanding is that Tiers III and IV -- like all EUC Tiers -- have been funded as "emergency spending" since their inception. In fact, maintaining the precedent of "emergency funding," has been the philosophical reason consistently given by the Democrats as they have refused to provide offsets for these extensions when new and through their subsequent renewals.

It seems odd that the Republicans would not have used Democrats' agreement to a "deficit neutral" Tier IV -- which in fact means that there is an offset -- against the Democrats in subsequent negotiations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Ocean County, NJ
621 posts, read 2,325,890 times
Reputation: 200
TALX Blog - Extension of Federal Unemployment Benefits Enacted

This is the only thing i can find. I remember vividly, that it was harped on during the whole Tier 4 process that it was deficit neutral due to the extension on the .2% FUTA Surtax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top