Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You mean Mr. Trump?
Mr. Donald Trump?
I dare you to go and suggest this idea on POLITICAL forum, instead of offering it in such quiet and uneventful place as "United Kingdom" section.
Looking forward to friendly exchange of opinions and the liveliness of discussion this topic will undoubtedly bring there.
Here we have two responses to foreign policy: one is based on the careful examination of the evidence and employing diplomacy, the other involves rushing headlong into a conflict with a heavily armed superpower. The foreign secretary has opted for the second option, being careless with the facts in order to achieve it. The first – the one we can now perhaps agree is preferable – was derided by much of the media, the Tories, and Labour’s self-styled moderates as being disunited and unserious. Most of these people also transformed into armchair generals as soon as the Iraq war was mooted, an act that predictably became Britain’s biggest foreign policy disaster of the last 30 years. In response to them, I can only paraphrase Clement Attlee: “a period of self-reflection on your part would be most welcome”.
Inevitably, Russia has clutched its national pearls over the comments from Porton Down and accusations of such a heinous act, and tensions with Britain have escalated. And yet Boris Johnson, who was gleefully stoking the fire just two weeks ago, remains in post. Surely one of the most basic requirements of being foreign secretary is not lying on the international stage and deteriorating relations with other countries?
I am actually sick and tired of Russia, so just do us all a favour and just close your Embassy in London and our Embassy in Moscow and just go away. You are indeed a pathetic nation.
It is sad, but the level of a once-great British diplomacy is at an amazingly low. As well as the level of communication.
If the Russians wearing 1970-style Speedos I meet on holiday in Southern Europe are anything to go by then most Russians must communicate by grunts in between mouthfuls of alcohol and punching their wives.
If the Russians wearing 1970-style Speedos I meet on holiday in Southern Europe are anything to go by then most Russians must communicate by grunts in between mouthfuls of alcohol and punching their wives.
It seems that this is the only understandable for West way of communication with Western World at the moment. Winner is who louder and bolder grunts.
It's not just the UK that thinks Putin is guilty but much of the international community.
Like the overweight Russian holidaymaker in out-dated budgie-smugglers with his peroxide blond wife with a suspicious bruise on her face there's nowhere for Russia to hide.
The 19 different excuses offered by Russia for the spy poisoning in Salisbury.
But what do you want? You punish, but do not give any information. Russians are trying to guess. Sometimes with a bit of humor.
Punishment without information is new in international law. I think next step is to declare war. Of course, for secret violations.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
